NAT 2024 | Saint Louis University Laboratory High School
805
Total Examinees
58.46%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
2%
Proficient & Above
(16 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
157 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
632 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
16 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 805 | 73.11% | Nearly Proficient |
0.2% (2) |
5.1% (41) |
41.9% (337) |
43.7% (352) |
9.1% (73) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 805 | 71.36% | Nearly Proficient |
0.9% (7) |
7.5% (60) |
39.6% (319) |
49.6% (399) |
2.5% (20) |
| HUMANITIES | 805 | 60.56% | Nearly Proficient |
0.5% (4) |
16% (129) |
75.8% (610) |
7.7% (62) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 805 | 60.35% | Nearly Proficient |
0.5% (4) |
14.9% (120) |
75.3% (606) |
9.3% (75) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 805 | 54.61% | Nearly Proficient |
2.7% (22) |
24.7% (199) |
70.8% (570) |
1.7% (14) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 805 | 52.11% | Nearly Proficient |
1.6% (13) |
36.8% (296) |
59.5% (479) |
2.1% (17) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 805 | 49.12% | Low Proficient |
1.1% (9) |
46.2% (372) |
52.5% (423) |
0.1% (1) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 805 | 46.48% | Low Proficient |
3.7% (30) |
58.3% (469) |
37.3% (300) |
0.7% (6) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
805 examinees73.11%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0.2%
LoP: 5.1%
NeP: 41.9%
P: 43.7%
HP: 9.1%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
805 examinees71.36%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0.9%
LoP: 7.5%
NeP: 39.6%
P: 49.6%
HP: 2.5%
HUMANITIES
805 examinees60.56%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0.5%
LoP: 16%
NeP: 75.8%
P: 7.7%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
805 examinees60.35%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0.5%
LoP: 14.9%
NeP: 75.3%
P: 9.3%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
805 examinees54.61%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.7%
LoP: 24.7%
NeP: 70.8%
P: 1.7%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
805 examinees52.11%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.6%
LoP: 36.8%
NeP: 59.5%
P: 2.1%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
805 examinees49.12%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.1%
LoP: 46.2%
NeP: 52.5%
P: 0.1%
HP: 0%
MATH
805 examinees46.48%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.7%
LoP: 58.3%
NeP: 37.3%
P: 0.7%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
73.83%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
71.04%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
69.13%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
67.94%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
64.38%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
63.83%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
51.82%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
53.22%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
51.82%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 92.11 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 0 | 100 | 14.18 |
| Understand The Problem | 83.17 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.16 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 81.62 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.25 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 77.85 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.5 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 74.58 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.19 |
| Evaluate Sources | 69.38 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.82 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 66.82 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.12 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 59.3 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.87 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 54.41 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.1 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluate Sources | 82.82 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.62 |
| Execute Strategy | 81.04 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.33 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 69.52 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.61 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 69.4 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 18.56 |
| Understand The Problem | 64.29 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.36 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 62.28 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.26 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 54.58 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.06 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 52.41 | Average Mastery | 0 | 91.67 | 16.38 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 41.57 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.38 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 70.46 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.38 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 61.24 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 18.96 |
| Evaluate Sources | 60.91 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.41 |
| Understand The Problem | 56.36 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.38 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 54.6 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.15 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 50.68 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.82 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 49.03 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.47 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 35.9 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.25 |
| Execute Strategy | 34.23 | Low Mastery | 0 | 77.78 | 15.16 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance92.11
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
14.18
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance83.17
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.16
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance81.62
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.25
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance77.85
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.5
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance74.58
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.19
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance69.38
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.82
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance66.82
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.12
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance59.3
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.87
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance54.41
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.1
HUMANITIES
9 domainsEvaluate Sources
Domain Performance82.82
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.62
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance81.04
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.33
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance69.52
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.61
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance69.4
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.56
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance64.29
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.36
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance62.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.26
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance54.58
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.06
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance52.41
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
91.67
Std Dev
16.38
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance41.57
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.38
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance70.46
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.38
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance61.24
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.96
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance60.91
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.41
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance56.36
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.38
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance54.6
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.15
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance50.68
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.82
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance49.03
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.47
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance35.9
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.25
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance34.23
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
77.78
Std Dev
15.16
21st Century Skills Performance Saint Louis University Laboratory High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Saint Louis University Laboratory High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects69.66
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects61.24
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects55.78
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 59.1% | 70.7% | 53.9% | 61.2% |
| Information Literacy | 55.2% | 60.7% | 51.4% | 55.8% |
| Problem Solving | 71.7% | 86.4% | 50.9% | 69.7% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 86.43 | Competent | 6.67 | 100 | 13.33 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 71.65 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 15.2 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 70.7 | Developing | 14.29 | 100 | 18.38 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 60.67 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 18.55 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 59.12 | Emerging | 0 | 94.44 | 15.29 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 55.22 | Emerging | 0 | 94.44 | 13.97 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 53.91 | Emerging | 4.76 | 90.48 | 14.74 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 51.44 | Emerging | 0 | 88.89 | 16.06 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 50.9 | Emerging | 0 | 85.71 | 14.05 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving86.43
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
6.67
Max
100
Std Dev
13.33
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving71.65
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
15.2
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking70.7
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
14.29
Max
100
Std Dev
18.38
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy60.67
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.55
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking59.12
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
94.44
Std Dev
15.29
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy55.22
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
94.44
Std Dev
13.97
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking53.91
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
4.76
Max
90.48
Std Dev
14.74
SCIENCE
Information Literacy51.44
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
16.06
SCIENCE
Problem Solving50.9
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
85.71
Std Dev
14.05
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saint Louis University Laboratory High School | 805 | 58.46% | 0% (0) | 19.5% (157) | 78.5% (632) | 2% (16) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Saint Louis University Laboratory High School
805 examinees58.46%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
19.5% (157)
Nearly Proficient
78.5% (632)
Proficient
2% (16)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)