NAT 2024 | Baguio Vision Christian Academy Foundation

2
Total Examinees
23.31%
Average MPS
Not Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
Subject Examinees Avg MPS Proficiency Level Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
PHILOSOPHY 2 40.63% Low Proficient 0%
(0)
100%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
LITERACY 2 36.46% Low Proficient 0%
(0)
100%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
SCIENCE 2 35% Low Proficient 0%
(0)
100%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
LANG_AND_COM 2 24.07% Not Proficient 50%
(1)
50%
(1)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
SOCIAL_SCIENCE 2 13.54% Not Proficient 50%
(1)
50%
(1)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
WIKA_AND_KOM 2 12.97% Not Proficient 50%
(1)
50%
(1)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
HUMANITIES 2 12.77% Not Proficient 50%
(1)
50%
(1)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
MATH 2 11.02% Not Proficient 100%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
2 examinees
40.63%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
2 examinees
36.46%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
2 examinees
35%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
2 examinees
24.07%
NoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 50%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
2 examinees
13.54%
NoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 50%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
2 examinees
12.97%
NoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 50%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
2 examinees
12.77%
NoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 50%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
2 examinees
11.02%
NoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 100%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart

About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.

How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.

Standard Benchmarks
  • 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
  • 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
  • 25-49% - Low Proficient
  • <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar

About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.

How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.

Performance Zones
  • Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
  • Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
  • Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
  • Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
41.67%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#2
38.89%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#3
33.8%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#4
33.34%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#5
30.56%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#6
30.56%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#7
25%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#8
19.45%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#9
19.45%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Ability To Manage Information 66.67 Moving Towards Mastery 33.33 100 33.34
Execute Strategy 58.34 Average Mastery 50 66.67 8.34
Understand The Problem 58.34 Average Mastery 50 66.67 8.34
Analyzing Relevance 50 Average Mastery 50 50 0
Analyzing Outcome 33.34 Low Mastery 0 66.67 33.34
Ability To Communicate Information 33.34 Low Mastery 0 66.67 33.34
Identify Types Of Information 33.33 Low Mastery 33.33 33.33 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 33.33 Low Mastery 22.22 44.44 11.11
Evaluate Sources 8.34 Very Low Mastery 0 16.67 8.34
SCIENCE 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Analyzing Outcome 58.33 Average Mastery 33.33 83.33 25
Ability To Communicate Information 41.67 Average Mastery 33.33 50 8.34
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 41.67 Average Mastery 33.33 50 8.34
Analyzing Relevance 38.89 Average Mastery 33.33 44.44 5.56
Understand The Problem 33.34 Low Mastery 16.67 50 16.67
Evaluate Sources 33.34 Low Mastery 16.67 50 16.67
Identify Types Of Information 33.33 Low Mastery 33.33 33.33 0
Ability To Manage Information 25 Low Mastery 16.67 33.33 8.33
Execute Strategy 16.67 Low Mastery 11.11 22.22 5.56
HUMANITIES 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Execute Strategy 50 Average Mastery 0 100 50
Understand The Problem 25 Low Mastery 0 50 25
Ability To Communicate Information 16.67 Low Mastery 0 33.33 16.67
Evaluate Sources 16.67 Low Mastery 0 33.33 16.67
Analyzing Relevance 12.5 Very Low Mastery 0 25 12.5
Ability To Manage Information 8.34 Very Low Mastery 0 16.67 8.34
Identify Types Of Information 8.34 Very Low Mastery 0 16.67 8.34
Analyzing Outcome 0 Absolutely No Mastery 0 0 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 0 Absolutely No Mastery 0 0 0
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domains
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 100
Std Dev 33.34
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
58.34
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 66.67
Std Dev 8.34
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
58.34
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 66.67
Std Dev 8.34
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 50
Std Dev 0
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
33.34
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 66.67
Std Dev 33.34
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
33.34
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 66.67
Std Dev 33.34
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 22.22
Max 44.44
Std Dev 11.11
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
8.34
Avg Score
Very Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 16.67
Std Dev 8.34
SCIENCE
9 domains
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
58.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 83.33
Std Dev 25
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 50
Std Dev 8.34
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 50
Std Dev 8.34
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
38.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 44.44
Std Dev 5.56
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
33.34
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 50
Std Dev 16.67
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
33.34
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 50
Std Dev 16.67
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
25
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 33.33
Std Dev 8.33
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
16.67
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 11.11
Max 22.22
Std Dev 5.56
HUMANITIES
9 domains
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 50
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
25
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 50
Std Dev 25
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
16.67
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 33.33
Std Dev 16.67
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
16.67
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 33.33
Std Dev 16.67
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
12.5
Avg Score
Very Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 25
Std Dev 12.5
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
8.34
Avg Score
Very Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 16.67
Std Dev 8.34
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
8.34
Avg Score
Very Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 16.67
Std Dev 8.34
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
0
Avg Score
Absolutely No Mastery
Min 0
Max 0
Std Dev 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
0
Avg Score
Absolutely No Mastery
Min 0
Max 0
Std Dev 0
21st Century Skills Performance Baguio Vision Christian Academy Foundation
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Baguio Vision Christian Academy Foundation
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects
34.95
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects
28.7
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking
3 subjects
26.72
Needs Support
Subjects:
SCIENCE PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness

Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.

Skills HUMANITIES PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE Average
Critical Thinking 11.1% 31.0% 38.1% 26.7%
Information Literacy 11.1% 41.7% 33.3% 28.7%
Problem Solving 18.2% 53.3% 33.3% 35.0%
Low
High
Skill Performance
Subject Skill Avg Score Competency Level Min Max Std Dev
PHILOSOPHY Problem Solving 53.34 Emerging 46.67 60 6.67
PHILOSOPHY Information Literacy 41.67 Emerging 25 58.33 16.67
SCIENCE Critical Thinking 38.1 Needs Support 33.33 42.86 4.77
SCIENCE Problem Solving 33.33 Needs Support 33.33 33.33 0
SCIENCE Information Literacy 33.33 Needs Support 33.33 33.33 0
PHILOSOPHY Critical Thinking 30.96 Needs Support 23.81 38.1 7.15
HUMANITIES Problem Solving 18.18 Needs Support 0 36.36 18.18
HUMANITIES Information Literacy 11.11 Needs Support 0 22.22 11.11
HUMANITIES Critical Thinking 11.11 Needs Support 0 22.22 11.11
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving
53.34
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 46.67
Max 60
Std Dev 6.67
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy
41.67
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 25
Max 58.33
Std Dev 16.67
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
38.1
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 33.33
Max 42.86
Std Dev 4.77
SCIENCE
Problem Solving
33.33
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
33.33
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking
30.96
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 23.81
Max 38.1
Std Dev 7.15
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving
18.18
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 0
Max 36.36
Std Dev 18.18
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
11.11
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 0
Max 22.22
Std Dev 11.11
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking
11.11
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 0
Max 22.22
Std Dev 11.11
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Rank School Name Examinees Avg MPS Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
1 Baguio Vision Christian Academy Foundation 2 23.31% 50% (1) 50% (1) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Baguio Vision Christian Academy Foundation
2 examinees
23.31%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient 50% (1)
Low Proficient 50% (1)
Nearly Proficient 0% (0)
Proficient 0% (0)
Highly Proficient 0% (0)