NAT 2024 | Baguio Vision Christian Academy Foundation
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 2 | 40.63% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
100% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 2 | 36.46% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
100% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 2 | 35% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
100% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 2 | 24.07% | Not Proficient |
50% (1) |
50% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 2 | 13.54% | Not Proficient |
50% (1) |
50% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 2 | 12.97% | Not Proficient |
50% (1) |
50% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 2 | 12.77% | Not Proficient |
50% (1) |
50% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 2 | 11.02% | Not Proficient |
100% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
2 examineesLITERACY
2 examineesSCIENCE
2 examineesLANG_AND_COM
2 examineesSOCIAL_SCIENCE
2 examineesWIKA_AND_KOM
2 examineesHUMANITIES
2 examineesMATH
2 examineesDomain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
Execute Strategy
Understand The Problem
Analyzing Relevance
Ability To Manage Information
Ability To Communicate Information
Analyzing Outcome
Identify Types Of Information
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability To Manage Information | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 33.34 |
| Execute Strategy | 58.34 | Average Mastery | 50 | 66.67 | 8.34 |
| Understand The Problem | 58.34 | Average Mastery | 50 | 66.67 | 8.34 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 50 | Average Mastery | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 33.34 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 33.34 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 33.34 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 33.34 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 22.22 | 44.44 | 11.11 |
| Evaluate Sources | 8.34 | Very Low Mastery | 0 | 16.67 | 8.34 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 58.33 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 25 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 41.67 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 50 | 8.34 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 41.67 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 50 | 8.34 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 38.89 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 44.44 | 5.56 |
| Understand The Problem | 33.34 | Low Mastery | 16.67 | 50 | 16.67 |
| Evaluate Sources | 33.34 | Low Mastery | 16.67 | 50 | 16.67 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 25 | Low Mastery | 16.67 | 33.33 | 8.33 |
| Execute Strategy | 16.67 | Low Mastery | 11.11 | 22.22 | 5.56 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 50 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 50 |
| Understand The Problem | 25 | Low Mastery | 0 | 50 | 25 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 16.67 | Low Mastery | 0 | 33.33 | 16.67 |
| Evaluate Sources | 16.67 | Low Mastery | 0 | 33.33 | 16.67 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 12.5 | Very Low Mastery | 0 | 25 | 12.5 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 8.34 | Very Low Mastery | 0 | 16.67 | 8.34 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 8.34 | Very Low Mastery | 0 | 16.67 | 8.34 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 0 | Absolutely No Mastery | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 0 | Absolutely No Mastery | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsAbility To Manage Information
Domain PerformanceExecute Strategy
Domain PerformanceUnderstand The Problem
Domain PerformanceAnalyzing Relevance
Domain PerformanceAnalyzing Outcome
Domain PerformanceAbility To Communicate Information
Domain PerformanceIdentify Types Of Information
Domain PerformanceUsed Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain PerformanceEvaluate Sources
Domain PerformanceSCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain PerformanceAbility To Communicate Information
Domain PerformanceUsed Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain PerformanceAnalyzing Relevance
Domain PerformanceUnderstand The Problem
Domain PerformanceEvaluate Sources
Domain PerformanceIdentify Types Of Information
Domain PerformanceAbility To Manage Information
Domain PerformanceExecute Strategy
Domain PerformanceHUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain PerformanceUnderstand The Problem
Domain PerformanceAbility To Communicate Information
Domain PerformanceEvaluate Sources
Domain PerformanceAnalyzing Relevance
Domain PerformanceAbility To Manage Information
Domain PerformanceIdentify Types Of Information
Domain PerformanceAnalyzing Outcome
Domain PerformanceUsed Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance21st Century Skills Performance Baguio Vision Christian Academy Foundation
21st Century Skills Performance
Baguio Vision Christian Academy FoundationProblem Solving
3 subjectsInformation Literacy
3 subjectsCritical Thinking
3 subjectsSkills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 11.1% | 31.0% | 38.1% | 26.7% |
| Information Literacy | 11.1% | 41.7% | 33.3% | 28.7% |
| Problem Solving | 18.2% | 53.3% | 33.3% | 35.0% |
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 53.34 | Emerging | 46.67 | 60 | 6.67 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 41.67 | Emerging | 25 | 58.33 | 16.67 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 38.1 | Needs Support | 33.33 | 42.86 | 4.77 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 33.33 | Needs Support | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 33.33 | Needs Support | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 30.96 | Needs Support | 23.81 | 38.1 | 7.15 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 18.18 | Needs Support | 0 | 36.36 | 18.18 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 11.11 | Needs Support | 0 | 22.22 | 11.11 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 11.11 | Needs Support | 0 | 22.22 | 11.11 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem SolvingPHILOSOPHY
Information LiteracySCIENCE
Critical ThinkingSCIENCE
Problem SolvingSCIENCE
Information LiteracyPHILOSOPHY
Critical ThinkingHUMANITIES
Problem SolvingHUMANITIES
Information LiteracyHUMANITIES
Critical ThinkingSchool Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baguio Vision Christian Academy Foundation | 2 | 23.31% | 50% (1) | 50% (1) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |