NAT 2024 | Union School International
5
Total Examinees
66.66%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
5 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 5 | 87.08% | Proficient |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
80% (4) |
20% (1) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 5 | 82.5% | Proficient |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
20% (1) |
80% (4) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 5 | 68.51% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
100% (5) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 5 | 66.67% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
100% (5) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 5 | 63.75% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
20% (1) |
60% (3) |
20% (1) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 5 | 60.66% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
20% (1) |
80% (4) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 5 | 52.22% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
40% (2) |
60% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 5 | 51.86% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
40% (2) |
60% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
5 examinees87.08%
P
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 0%
P: 80%
HP: 20%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
5 examinees82.5%
P
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 20%
P: 80%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
5 examinees68.51%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 100%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
5 examinees66.67%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 100%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
5 examinees63.75%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 20%
NeP: 60%
P: 20%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
5 examinees60.66%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 20%
NeP: 80%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
5 examinees52.22%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 40%
NeP: 60%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
5 examinees51.86%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 40%
NeP: 60%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
83.33%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
81.11%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
66.67%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
73.33%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
72.22%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
72.22%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
70.74%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
67.78%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
66.67%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Relevance | 96.67 | Mastered | 83.33 | 100 | 6.67 |
| Execute Strategy | 93.33 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 83.33 | 100 | 8.17 |
| Understand The Problem | 90 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 83.33 | 100 | 8.17 |
| Evaluate Sources | 90 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 13.33 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 88.89 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 77.78 | 100 | 7.03 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 86.67 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 16.33 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 80 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 16.33 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 80 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 26.67 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 70 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 19.44 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 93.33 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 13.33 |
| Execute Strategy | 86.67 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 16.33 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 83.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 10.54 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 80 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 19.44 |
| Evaluate Sources | 80 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 26.67 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 63.33 | Average Mastery | 50 | 100 | 19.44 |
| Understand The Problem | 60 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 37.42 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 53.33 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 22.11 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 53.33 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 66.67 | 11.31 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 80 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 12.47 |
| Evaluate Sources | 73.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 20 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 70 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 22.11 |
| Understand The Problem | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 83.33 | 10.54 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 21.08 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 62.22 | Average Mastery | 44.44 | 77.78 | 11.33 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 56.67 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 22.61 |
| Execute Strategy | 40 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 66.67 | 16.63 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 40 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 17 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsAnalyzing Relevance
Domain Performance96.67
Avg Score
Mastered
Min
83.33
Max
100
Std Dev
6.67
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance93.33
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
83.33
Max
100
Std Dev
8.17
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance90
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
83.33
Max
100
Std Dev
8.17
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance90
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
13.33
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance88.89
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
77.78
Max
100
Std Dev
7.03
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance86.67
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.33
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance80
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.33
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance80
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
26.67
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance70
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
19.44
HUMANITIES
9 domainsUsed Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance93.33
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
13.33
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance86.67
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.33
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance83.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
10.54
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance80
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
19.44
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance80
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
26.67
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance63.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
19.44
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance60
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
37.42
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance53.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.11
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance53.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
11.31
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance80
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
12.47
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance73.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
20
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance70
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
22.11
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
83.33
Std Dev
10.54
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
21.08
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance62.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
44.44
Max
77.78
Std Dev
11.33
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance56.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.61
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance40
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.63
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance40
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
17
21st Century Skills Performance Union School International
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Union School International
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects76.57
Strong
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects71.64
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects68.33
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 64.4% | 91.4% | 59.1% | 71.6% |
| Information Literacy | 65.6% | 75.0% | 64.4% | 68.3% |
| Problem Solving | 80.0% | 90.7% | 59.1% | 76.6% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 91.43 | Competent | 85.71 | 100 | 5.56 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 90.67 | Competent | 80 | 100 | 6.8 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 80 | Competent | 63.64 | 90.91 | 10.6 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 75 | Developing | 58.33 | 91.67 | 11.79 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 65.56 | Developing | 55.56 | 77.78 | 7.37 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 64.44 | Developing | 44.44 | 83.33 | 14.74 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 64.44 | Developing | 50 | 72.22 | 9.68 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 59.05 | Emerging | 42.86 | 76.19 | 11.51 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 59.05 | Emerging | 42.86 | 71.43 | 11.11 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking91.43
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
85.71
Max
100
Std Dev
5.56
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving90.67
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
80
Max
100
Std Dev
6.8
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving80
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
63.64
Max
90.91
Std Dev
10.6
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy75
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
58.33
Max
91.67
Std Dev
11.79
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy65.56
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
55.56
Max
77.78
Std Dev
7.37
SCIENCE
Information Literacy64.44
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
44.44
Max
83.33
Std Dev
14.74
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking64.44
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
50
Max
72.22
Std Dev
9.68
SCIENCE
Problem Solving59.05
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
42.86
Max
76.19
Std Dev
11.51
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking59.05
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
42.86
Max
71.43
Std Dev
11.11
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Union School International | 5 | 66.66% | 0% (0) | 0% (0) | 100% (5) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Union School International
5 examinees66.66%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
0% (0)
Nearly Proficient
100% (5)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)