NAT 2024 | Baguio International Academy
18
Total Examinees
46.65%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
13 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
5 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 18 | 66.09% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
5.6% (1) |
66.7% (12) |
22.2% (4) |
5.6% (1) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 18 | 57.18% | Nearly Proficient |
5.6% (1) |
22.2% (4) |
66.7% (12) |
5.6% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 18 | 47.11% | Low Proficient |
11.1% (2) |
38.9% (7) |
50% (9) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 18 | 44.09% | Low Proficient |
5.6% (1) |
66.7% (12) |
27.8% (5) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 18 | 41.67% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
83.3% (15) |
16.7% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 18 | 40.74% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
88.9% (16) |
11.1% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 18 | 38.68% | Low Proficient |
11.1% (2) |
61.1% (11) |
27.8% (5) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 18 | 37.67% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
83.3% (15) |
16.7% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
18 examinees66.09%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 5.6%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 22.2%
HP: 5.6%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
18 examinees57.18%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.6%
LoP: 22.2%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 5.6%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
18 examinees47.11%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 11.1%
LoP: 38.9%
NeP: 50%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
18 examinees44.09%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.6%
LoP: 66.7%
NeP: 27.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
18 examinees41.67%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 83.3%
NeP: 16.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
18 examinees40.74%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 88.9%
NeP: 11.1%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
18 examinees38.68%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 11.1%
LoP: 61.1%
NeP: 27.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
18 examinees37.67%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 83.3%
NeP: 16.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
65.74%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
61.21%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
59.88%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
56.48%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
54.94%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
51.13%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
39.82%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
39.2%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
39.2%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 87.96 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.09 |
| Understand The Problem | 84.26 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 16.17 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 81.48 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.72 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 74.08 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 23.72 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 65.74 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 13 |
| Evaluate Sources | 57.41 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 18.61 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 54.32 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.63 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 53.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.69 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 47.22 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.7 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 70.37 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.16 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 64.82 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 16.56 |
| Evaluate Sources | 59.26 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 26.19 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 53.7 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 16.25 |
| Understand The Problem | 44.44 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.87 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 35.19 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.44 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 35.18 | Average Mastery | 8.33 | 58.33 | 11.3 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 27.22 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 25 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.44 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Relevance | 52.47 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 100 | 20.56 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 50.93 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 21.13 |
| Understand The Problem | 50.93 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 25.14 |
| Evaluate Sources | 48.15 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 19.95 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 41.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 19.45 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 38.89 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.64 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 37.04 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 23.28 |
| Execute Strategy | 25.31 | Low Mastery | 11.11 | 44.44 | 10.35 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 23.15 | Low Mastery | 0 | 50 | 12.59 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance87.96
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.09
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance84.26
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
16.17
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance81.48
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.72
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance74.08
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
23.72
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance65.74
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
13
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance57.41
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.61
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance54.32
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.63
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance53.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.69
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance47.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.7
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance70.37
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.16
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance64.82
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
16.56
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance59.26
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
26.19
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance53.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.25
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance44.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.87
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance35.19
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.44
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance35.18
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
8.33
Max
58.33
Std Dev
11.3
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
27.22
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance25
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.44
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Relevance
Domain Performance52.47
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
100
Std Dev
20.56
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance50.93
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
21.13
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance50.93
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
25.14
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance48.15
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.95
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
19.45
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance38.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.64
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance37.04
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
23.28
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance25.31
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
44.44
Std Dev
10.35
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance23.15
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
50
Std Dev
12.59
21st Century Skills Performance Baguio International Academy
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Baguio International Academy
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects62.59
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects46.74
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects44.24
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 38.9% | 58.5% | 42.9% | 46.7% |
| Information Literacy | 38.0% | 55.6% | 39.2% | 44.2% |
| Problem Solving | 62.6% | 85.2% | 40.0% | 62.6% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 85.18 | Competent | 33.33 | 100 | 16.86 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 62.63 | Developing | 27.27 | 100 | 17.11 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 58.47 | Emerging | 23.81 | 85.71 | 14.96 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 55.56 | Emerging | 25 | 91.67 | 15.47 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 42.86 | Emerging | 23.81 | 66.67 | 11.45 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 39.95 | Needs Support | 23.81 | 61.9 | 11.24 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 39.2 | Needs Support | 22.22 | 77.78 | 13.92 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 38.89 | Needs Support | 22.22 | 66.67 | 11.42 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 37.96 | Needs Support | 11.11 | 66.67 | 13.39 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving85.18
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
16.86
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving62.63
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
27.27
Max
100
Std Dev
17.11
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking58.47
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
23.81
Max
85.71
Std Dev
14.96
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy55.56
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
25
Max
91.67
Std Dev
15.47
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking42.86
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
23.81
Max
66.67
Std Dev
11.45
SCIENCE
Problem Solving39.95
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
23.81
Max
61.9
Std Dev
11.24
SCIENCE
Information Literacy39.2
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
22.22
Max
77.78
Std Dev
13.92
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking38.89
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
22.22
Max
66.67
Std Dev
11.42
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy37.96
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
11.11
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.39
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baguio International Academy | 18 | 46.65% | 0% (0) | 72.2% (13) | 27.8% (5) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Baguio International Academy
18 examinees46.65%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
72.2% (13)
Nearly Proficient
27.8% (5)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)