NAT 2024 | Shalom International School

3
Total Examinees
60.33%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
3 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
Subject Examinees Avg MPS Proficiency Level Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
PHILOSOPHY 3 81.94% Proficient 0%
(0)
0%
(0)
33.3%
(1)
66.7%
(2)
0%
(0)
SOCIAL_SCIENCE 3 77.08% Proficient 0%
(0)
0%
(0)
33.3%
(1)
66.7%
(2)
0%
(0)
HUMANITIES 3 63.83% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
0%
(0)
100%
(3)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
MATH 3 55.37% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
33.3%
(1)
66.7%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
LITERACY 3 54.86% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
0%
(0)
100%
(3)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
SCIENCE 3 53.89% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
33.3%
(1)
66.7%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
LANG_AND_COM 3 50.62% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
33.3%
(1)
66.7%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
WIKA_AND_KOM 3 45.06% Low Proficient 0%
(0)
33.3%
(1)
66.7%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
3 examinees
81.94%
P
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 66.7%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
3 examinees
77.08%
P
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 66.7%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
3 examinees
63.83%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 100%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
3 examinees
55.37%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
3 examinees
54.86%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 100%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
3 examinees
53.89%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
3 examinees
50.62%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
3 examinees
45.06%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart

About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.

How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.

Standard Benchmarks
  • 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
  • 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
  • 25-49% - Low Proficient
  • <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar

About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.

How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.

Performance Zones
  • Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
  • Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
  • Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
  • Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
87.04%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#2
81.48%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#3
73.45%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#4
48.15%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#5
72.22%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#6
70.37%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#7
58.64%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#8
55.56%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#9
48.15%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
Domain Performance
HUMANITIES 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Understand The Problem 100 Mastered 100 100 0
Evaluate Sources 100 Mastered 100 100 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 88.89 Closely Approximating Mastery 66.67 100 15.71
Execute Strategy 77.78 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 100 15.71
Ability To Communicate Information 77.78 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 100 15.71
Analyzing Outcome 55.56 Average Mastery 33.33 66.67 15.72
Analyzing Relevance 55.55 Average Mastery 50 58.33 3.93
Identify Types Of Information 44.45 Average Mastery 16.67 66.67 20.79
Ability To Manage Information 44.44 Average Mastery 33.33 50 7.86
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Analyzing Relevance 94.44 Closely Approximating Mastery 83.33 100 7.86
Evaluate Sources 94.44 Closely Approximating Mastery 83.33 100 7.86
Analyzing Outcome 88.89 Closely Approximating Mastery 66.67 100 15.71
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 85.19 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 100 13.86
Understand The Problem 83.33 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 100 13.61
Ability To Communicate Information 77.78 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 100 15.71
Execute Strategy 72.22 Moving Towards Mastery 50 83.33 15.71
Identify Types Of Information 72.22 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 83.33 7.85
Ability To Manage Information 55.56 Average Mastery 33.33 66.67 15.72
SCIENCE 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Analyzing Relevance 70.37 Moving Towards Mastery 55.56 77.78 10.47
Analyzing Outcome 66.67 Moving Towards Mastery 50 83.33 13.61
Evaluate Sources 66.67 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 66.67 0
Understand The Problem 61.11 Average Mastery 50 66.67 7.86
Ability To Communicate Information 61.11 Average Mastery 33.33 83.33 20.79
Identify Types Of Information 50 Average Mastery 33.33 66.67 13.61
Ability To Manage Information 44.45 Average Mastery 16.67 66.67 20.79
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 44.44 Average Mastery 33.33 50 7.86
Execute Strategy 25.92 Low Mastery 0 44.44 18.88
Domain Performance
HUMANITIES
9 domains
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
100
Avg Score
Mastered
Min 100
Max 100
Std Dev 0
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
100
Avg Score
Mastered
Min 100
Max 100
Std Dev 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
88.89
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 100
Std Dev 15.71
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 100
Std Dev 15.71
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 100
Std Dev 15.71
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 66.67
Std Dev 15.72
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
55.55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 58.33
Std Dev 3.93
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
44.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 20.79
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
44.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 50
Std Dev 7.86
PHILOSOPHY
9 domains
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
94.44
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min 83.33
Max 100
Std Dev 7.86
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
94.44
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min 83.33
Max 100
Std Dev 7.86
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
88.89
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 100
Std Dev 15.71
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
85.19
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 100
Std Dev 13.86
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
83.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 100
Std Dev 13.61
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 100
Std Dev 15.71
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
72.22
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 50
Max 83.33
Std Dev 15.71
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
72.22
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 83.33
Std Dev 7.85
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 66.67
Std Dev 15.72
SCIENCE
9 domains
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
70.37
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 55.56
Max 77.78
Std Dev 10.47
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 50
Max 83.33
Std Dev 13.61
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 0
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
61.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 66.67
Std Dev 7.86
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
61.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 83.33
Std Dev 20.79
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 66.67
Std Dev 13.61
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
44.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 20.79
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
44.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 50
Std Dev 7.86
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
25.92
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 44.44
Std Dev 18.88
21st Century Skills Performance Shalom International School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Shalom International School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Critical Thinking
3 subjects
73.64
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Problem Solving
3 subjects
65.77
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects
58.95
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness

Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.

Skills HUMANITIES PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE Average
Critical Thinking 68.5% 90.5% 61.9% 73.6%
Information Literacy 55.6% 69.5% 51.9% 59.0%
Problem Solving 69.7% 80.0% 47.6% 65.8%
Low
High
Skill Performance
Subject Skill Avg Score Competency Level Min Max Std Dev
PHILOSOPHY Critical Thinking 90.48 Competent 76.19 100 10.29
PHILOSOPHY Problem Solving 80 Competent 73.33 86.67 5.45
HUMANITIES Problem Solving 69.7 Developing 63.64 72.73 4.29
PHILOSOPHY Information Literacy 69.45 Developing 66.67 75 3.93
HUMANITIES Critical Thinking 68.52 Developing 61.11 72.22 5.24
SCIENCE Critical Thinking 61.91 Developing 52.38 66.67 6.74
HUMANITIES Information Literacy 55.56 Emerging 38.89 72.22 13.61
SCIENCE Information Literacy 51.85 Emerging 27.78 66.67 17.17
SCIENCE Problem Solving 47.62 Emerging 28.57 57.14 13.47
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking
90.48
Strong
Competency: Competent
Min 76.19
Max 100
Std Dev 10.29
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving
80
Strong
Competency: Competent
Min 73.33
Max 86.67
Std Dev 5.45
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving
69.7
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 63.64
Max 72.73
Std Dev 4.29
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy
69.45
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 66.67
Max 75
Std Dev 3.93
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking
68.52
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 61.11
Max 72.22
Std Dev 5.24
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
61.91
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 52.38
Max 66.67
Std Dev 6.74
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
55.56
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 38.89
Max 72.22
Std Dev 13.61
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
51.85
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 27.78
Max 66.67
Std Dev 17.17
SCIENCE
Problem Solving
47.62
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 28.57
Max 57.14
Std Dev 13.47
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Rank School Name Examinees Avg MPS Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
1 Shalom International School 3 60.33% 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (3) 0% (0) 0% (0)
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Shalom International School
3 examinees
60.33%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient 0% (0)
Low Proficient 0% (0)
Nearly Proficient 100% (3)
Proficient 0% (0)
Highly Proficient 0% (0)