NAT 2024 | Remnant International College, Inc.

20
Total Examinees
46.46%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
5%
Proficient & Above
(1 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
14 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
5 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
Subject Examinees Avg MPS Proficiency Level Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
PHILOSOPHY 20 61.98% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
10%
(2)
75%
(15)
10%
(2)
5%
(1)
SOCIAL_SCIENCE 20 53.44% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
35%
(7)
55%
(11)
10%
(2)
0%
(0)
LITERACY 20 50.62% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
45%
(9)
50%
(10)
5%
(1)
0%
(0)
HUMANITIES 20 50.32% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
35%
(7)
65%
(13)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
WIKA_AND_KOM 20 45.28% Low Proficient 5%
(1)
55%
(11)
35%
(7)
5%
(1)
0%
(0)
LANG_AND_COM 20 38.43% Low Proficient 0%
(0)
85%
(17)
15%
(3)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
SCIENCE 20 37.5% Low Proficient 5%
(1)
85%
(17)
10%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
MATH 20 34.15% Low Proficient 20%
(4)
75%
(15)
5%
(1)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
20 examinees
61.98%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 10%
NeP: 75%
P: 10%
HP: 5%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
20 examinees
53.44%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 35%
NeP: 55%
P: 10%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
20 examinees
50.62%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 45%
NeP: 50%
P: 5%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
20 examinees
50.32%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 35%
NeP: 65%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
20 examinees
45.28%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5%
LoP: 55%
NeP: 35%
P: 5%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
20 examinees
38.43%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 85%
NeP: 15%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
20 examinees
37.5%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5%
LoP: 85%
NeP: 10%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
20 examinees
34.15%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 20%
LoP: 75%
NeP: 5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart

About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.

How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.

Standard Benchmarks
  • 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
  • 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
  • 25-49% - Low Proficient
  • <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar

About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.

How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.

Performance Zones
  • Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
  • Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
  • Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
  • Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
62.04%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#2
61.95%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#3
60.56%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#4
56.66%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#5
54.16%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#6
48.52%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#7
36.39%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#8
41.39%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#9
36.39%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Execute Strategy 88.33 Closely Approximating Mastery 33.33 100 16.75
Understand The Problem 76.67 Moving Towards Mastery 50 100 17
Analyzing Outcome 71.67 Moving Towards Mastery 33.33 100 26.41
Ability To Communicate Information 68.33 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 26.82
Analyzing Relevance 65 Average Mastery 16.67 100 21.67
Evaluate Sources 53.33 Average Mastery 0 100 23.92
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 52.22 Average Mastery 11.11 100 26.08
Ability To Manage Information 50 Average Mastery 0 100 35.75
Identify Types Of Information 39.17 Average Mastery 0 83.33 21.26
HUMANITIES 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Execute Strategy 76.67 Moving Towards Mastery 33.33 100 18.56
Evaluate Sources 68.33 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 34.12
Analyzing Outcome 61.67 Average Mastery 33.33 83.33 15.9
Ability To Communicate Information 58.33 Average Mastery 16.67 83.33 18.63
Understand The Problem 57.5 Average Mastery 0 100 23.85
Identify Types Of Information 46.67 Average Mastery 16.67 83.33 19.44
Analyzing Relevance 41.67 Average Mastery 8.33 66.67 13.69
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 38.33 Average Mastery 0 100 28.43
Ability To Manage Information 33.33 Low Mastery 0 66.67 14.91
SCIENCE 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Analyzing Outcome 52.5 Average Mastery 0 100 24.31
Evaluate Sources 48.33 Average Mastery 0 100 24.66
Understand The Problem 47.5 Average Mastery 16.67 83.33 23.14
Ability To Manage Information 40.83 Average Mastery 0 100 29.57
Analyzing Relevance 38.89 Average Mastery 11.11 66.67 18.09
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 36.67 Average Mastery 16.67 83.33 17.16
Ability To Communicate Information 35.83 Average Mastery 0 83.33 20.6
Identify Types Of Information 23.33 Low Mastery 0 50 16.16
Execute Strategy 21.11 Low Mastery 11.11 44.44 11.05
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domains
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
88.33
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 100
Std Dev 16.75
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
76.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 50
Max 100
Std Dev 17
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
71.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 100
Std Dev 26.41
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
68.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 26.82
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
65
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 100
Std Dev 21.67
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
53.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 23.92
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
52.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 11.11
Max 100
Std Dev 26.08
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 35.75
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
39.17
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 21.26
HUMANITIES
9 domains
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
76.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 100
Std Dev 18.56
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
68.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 34.12
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
61.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 83.33
Std Dev 15.9
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
58.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 83.33
Std Dev 18.63
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
57.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 23.85
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
46.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 83.33
Std Dev 19.44
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 8.33
Max 66.67
Std Dev 13.69
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
38.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 28.43
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 66.67
Std Dev 14.91
SCIENCE
9 domains
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
52.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 24.31
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
48.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 24.66
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
47.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 83.33
Std Dev 23.14
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
40.83
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 29.57
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
38.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 11.11
Max 66.67
Std Dev 18.09
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
36.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 83.33
Std Dev 17.16
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
35.83
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 20.6
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
23.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 50
Std Dev 16.16
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
21.11
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 11.11
Max 44.44
Std Dev 11.05
21st Century Skills Performance Remnant International College, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Remnant International College, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects
60.98
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects
47.57
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects
42.87
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness

Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.

Skills HUMANITIES PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE Average
Critical Thinking 45.6% 56.2% 41.0% 47.6%
Information Literacy 46.1% 49.2% 33.3% 42.9%
Problem Solving 65.0% 80.3% 37.6% 61.0%
Low
High
Skill Performance
Subject Skill Avg Score Competency Level Min Max Std Dev
PHILOSOPHY Problem Solving 80.33 Competent 46.67 100 14.37
HUMANITIES Problem Solving 65 Developing 45.45 81.82 10.48
PHILOSOPHY Critical Thinking 56.19 Emerging 23.81 100 18.23
PHILOSOPHY Information Literacy 49.17 Emerging 25 91.67 18.05
HUMANITIES Information Literacy 46.11 Emerging 27.78 77.78 12.31
HUMANITIES Critical Thinking 45.56 Emerging 11.11 72.22 13.79
SCIENCE Critical Thinking 40.95 Emerging 19.05 80.95 13.75
SCIENCE Problem Solving 37.62 Needs Support 14.29 61.9 11.56
SCIENCE Information Literacy 33.33 Needs Support 11.11 61.11 15.71
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving
80.33
Strong
Competency: Competent
Min 46.67
Max 100
Std Dev 14.37
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving
65
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 45.45
Max 81.82
Std Dev 10.48
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking
56.19
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 23.81
Max 100
Std Dev 18.23
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy
49.17
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 25
Max 91.67
Std Dev 18.05
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
46.11
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 27.78
Max 77.78
Std Dev 12.31
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking
45.56
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 11.11
Max 72.22
Std Dev 13.79
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
40.95
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 19.05
Max 80.95
Std Dev 13.75
SCIENCE
Problem Solving
37.62
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 14.29
Max 61.9
Std Dev 11.56
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
33.33
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 11.11
Max 61.11
Std Dev 15.71
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Rank School Name Examinees Avg MPS Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
1 Remnant International College, Inc. 20 46.46% 0% (0) 70% (14) 25% (5) 5% (1) 0% (0)
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Remnant International College, Inc.
20 examinees
46.46%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient 0% (0)
Low Proficient 70% (14)
Nearly Proficient 25% (5)
Proficient 5% (1)
Highly Proficient 0% (0)