NAT 2024 | Educare College, Inc.
63
Total Examinees
48.54%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
32 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
31 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 63 | 60.78% | Nearly Proficient |
4.8% (3) |
17.5% (11) |
50.8% (32) |
23.8% (15) |
3.2% (2) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 63 | 56.38% | Nearly Proficient |
1.6% (1) |
34.9% (22) |
47.6% (30) |
14.3% (9) |
1.6% (1) |
| HUMANITIES | 63 | 50.08% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
49.2% (31) |
47.6% (30) |
3.2% (2) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 63 | 49.47% | Low Proficient |
3.2% (2) |
41.3% (26) |
55.6% (35) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 63 | 49.35% | Low Proficient |
4.8% (3) |
41.3% (26) |
52.4% (33) |
1.6% (1) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 63 | 43.54% | Low Proficient |
3.2% (2) |
68.3% (43) |
28.6% (18) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 63 | 40.27% | Low Proficient |
11.1% (7) |
63.5% (40) |
25.4% (16) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 63 | 38.42% | Low Proficient |
6.3% (4) |
79.4% (50) |
14.3% (9) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
63 examinees60.78%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4.8%
LoP: 17.5%
NeP: 50.8%
P: 23.8%
HP: 3.2%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
63 examinees56.38%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.6%
LoP: 34.9%
NeP: 47.6%
P: 14.3%
HP: 1.6%
HUMANITIES
63 examinees50.08%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 49.2%
NeP: 47.6%
P: 3.2%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
63 examinees49.47%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.2%
LoP: 41.3%
NeP: 55.6%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
63 examinees49.35%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4.8%
LoP: 41.3%
NeP: 52.4%
P: 1.6%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
63 examinees43.54%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.2%
LoP: 68.3%
NeP: 28.6%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
63 examinees40.27%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 11.1%
LoP: 63.5%
NeP: 25.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
63 examinees38.42%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.3%
LoP: 79.4%
NeP: 14.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
66.49%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
62.17%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
58.2%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
57.94%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
55.91%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
50.75%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
40.57%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
41.27%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
40.57%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 86.24 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.91 |
| Understand The Problem | 71.96 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.02 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 70.37 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.93 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 68.25 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.49 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 59.52 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.89 |
| Evaluate Sources | 55.03 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.16 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 54.14 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 100 | 23.47 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 47.09 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.88 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 39.42 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 24 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 82.01 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.87 |
| Evaluate Sources | 65.08 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.67 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 59.52 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 18.95 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 58.73 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 20.54 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 56.08 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.51 |
| Understand The Problem | 53.97 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 35.97 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 46.83 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.59 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 38.23 | Average Mastery | 8.33 | 75 | 17.04 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 31.22 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 16.66 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 57.41 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.45 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 54.5 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.02 |
| Evaluate Sources | 53.7 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 22.89 |
| Understand The Problem | 48.68 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.08 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 43.39 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.58 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 39.95 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.11 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 37.57 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.99 |
| Execute Strategy | 31.21 | Low Mastery | 11.11 | 66.67 | 12.5 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 26.19 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 18.95 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance86.24
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.91
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance71.96
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.02
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance70.37
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.93
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance68.25
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.49
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance59.52
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.89
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance55.03
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.16
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance54.14
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
100
Std Dev
23.47
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance47.09
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.88
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance39.42
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
24
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance82.01
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.87
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance65.08
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.67
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance59.52
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
18.95
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance58.73
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
20.54
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance56.08
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.51
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance53.97
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
35.97
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance46.83
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.59
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance38.23
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
8.33
Max
75
Std Dev
17.04
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance31.22
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.66
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance57.41
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.45
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance54.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.02
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance53.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
22.89
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance48.68
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.08
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance43.39
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.58
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance39.95
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.11
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance37.57
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.99
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance31.21
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
66.67
Std Dev
12.5
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance26.19
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.95
21st Century Skills Performance Educare College, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Educare College, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects61.75
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects49.26
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects44.9
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 45.7% | 55.9% | 46.2% | 49.3% |
| Information Literacy | 45.9% | 48.6% | 40.3% | 44.9% |
| Problem Solving | 64.2% | 77.4% | 43.7% | 61.8% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 77.35 | Developing | 13.33 | 100 | 21.76 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 64.22 | Developing | 18.18 | 90.91 | 15.94 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 55.93 | Emerging | 9.52 | 95.24 | 20.54 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 48.55 | Emerging | 8.33 | 91.67 | 18.64 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 46.18 | Emerging | 14.29 | 80.95 | 15.14 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 45.86 | Emerging | 22.22 | 88.89 | 14.07 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 45.68 | Emerging | 16.67 | 83.33 | 16.46 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 43.69 | Emerging | 14.29 | 71.43 | 12.46 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 40.3 | Emerging | 11.11 | 83.33 | 16.47 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving77.35
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
13.33
Max
100
Std Dev
21.76
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving64.22
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
18.18
Max
90.91
Std Dev
15.94
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking55.93
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
9.52
Max
95.24
Std Dev
20.54
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy48.55
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
8.33
Max
91.67
Std Dev
18.64
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking46.18
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
14.29
Max
80.95
Std Dev
15.14
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy45.86
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
22.22
Max
88.89
Std Dev
14.07
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking45.68
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.46
SCIENCE
Problem Solving43.69
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
14.29
Max
71.43
Std Dev
12.46
SCIENCE
Information Literacy40.3
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
11.11
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.47
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Educare College, Inc. | 63 | 48.54% | 0% (0) | 50.8% (32) | 49.2% (31) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Educare College, Inc.
63 examinees48.54%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
50.8% (32)
Nearly Proficient
49.2% (31)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)