NAT 2024 | Academia de Sophia International Inc.
10
Total Examinees
65.05%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
10%
Proficient & Above
(1 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
8 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 10 | 83.54% | Proficient |
0% (0) |
10% (1) |
10% (1) |
20% (2) |
60% (6) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 10 | 74.17% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
10% (1) |
30% (3) |
60% (6) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 10 | 73.96% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
40% (4) |
50% (5) |
10% (1) |
| HUMANITIES | 10 | 67.66% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
10% (1) |
70% (7) |
20% (2) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 10 | 60.51% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
20% (2) |
70% (7) |
10% (1) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 10 | 58% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
20% (2) |
80% (8) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 10 | 52.59% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
30% (3) |
70% (7) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 10 | 50% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
60% (6) |
40% (4) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
10 examinees83.54%
P
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 10%
NeP: 10%
P: 20%
HP: 60%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
10 examinees74.17%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 10%
NeP: 30%
P: 60%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
10 examinees73.96%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 40%
P: 50%
HP: 10%
HUMANITIES
10 examinees67.66%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 10%
NeP: 70%
P: 20%
HP: 0%
MATH
10 examinees60.51%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 20%
NeP: 70%
P: 10%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
10 examinees58%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 20%
NeP: 80%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
10 examinees52.59%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 30%
NeP: 70%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
10 examinees50%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 60%
NeP: 40%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
86.11%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
77.22%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
76.11%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
73.8%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
72.78%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
57.22%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
65%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
62.22%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
57.22%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 96.67 | Mastered | 66.67 | 100 | 10 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 95 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 50 | 100 | 15 |
| Execute Strategy | 91.67 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 83.33 | 100 | 8.34 |
| Understand The Problem | 91.67 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 11.18 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 78.89 | Moving Towards Mastery | 22.22 | 100 | 22.47 |
| Evaluate Sources | 78.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.67 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 73.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 28.09 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 73.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 24.95 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 70 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.8 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluate Sources | 90 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 15.27 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 90 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 15.27 |
| Execute Strategy | 86.67 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 16.33 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 76.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 13.33 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 73.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 18.56 |
| Understand The Problem | 70 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 24.49 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 25.82 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 57.5 | Average Mastery | 25 | 83.33 | 15.11 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 41.67 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 50 | 11.18 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 85 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 17.4 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 68.89 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 88.89 | 17.07 |
| Understand The Problem | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 18.26 |
| Evaluate Sources | 63.34 | Average Mastery | 50 | 83.33 | 10 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 60 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 20 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 48.33 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 66.67 | 11.67 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 46.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 19.44 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 46.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 30.55 |
| Execute Strategy | 40 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 55.56 | 12.38 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance96.67
Avg Score
Mastered
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
10
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance95
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
15
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance91.67
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
83.33
Max
100
Std Dev
8.34
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance91.67
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
11.18
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance78.89
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
100
Std Dev
22.47
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance78.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.67
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance73.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
28.09
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance73.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
24.95
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance70
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.8
HUMANITIES
9 domainsEvaluate Sources
Domain Performance90
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
15.27
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance90
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
15.27
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance86.67
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.33
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance76.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
13.33
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance73.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
18.56
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance70
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
24.49
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
25.82
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance57.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
25
Max
83.33
Std Dev
15.11
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
50
Std Dev
11.18
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance85
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
17.4
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance68.89
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
88.89
Std Dev
17.07
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
18.26
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance63.34
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
50
Max
83.33
Std Dev
10
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance60
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance48.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
11.67
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance46.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
19.44
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance46.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
30.55
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance40
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
55.56
Std Dev
12.38
21st Century Skills Performance Academia de Sophia International Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Academia de Sophia International Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects77.11
Strong
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects70.87
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects61.58
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 68.3% | 83.3% | 61.0% | 70.9% |
| Information Literacy | 60.6% | 72.5% | 51.7% | 61.6% |
| Problem Solving | 78.2% | 92.7% | 60.5% | 77.1% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 92.67 | Competent | 73.33 | 100 | 7.57 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 83.34 | Competent | 23.81 | 100 | 21.64 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 78.18 | Developing | 54.55 | 90.91 | 11.64 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 72.5 | Developing | 25 | 91.67 | 22.99 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 68.33 | Developing | 38.89 | 88.89 | 13.62 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 60.95 | Developing | 28.57 | 85.71 | 15.33 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 60.56 | Developing | 27.78 | 77.78 | 15.41 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 60.48 | Developing | 33.33 | 71.43 | 10.45 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 51.67 | Emerging | 22.22 | 72.22 | 14.07 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving92.67
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
73.33
Max
100
Std Dev
7.57
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking83.34
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
23.81
Max
100
Std Dev
21.64
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving78.18
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
54.55
Max
90.91
Std Dev
11.64
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy72.5
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
25
Max
91.67
Std Dev
22.99
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking68.33
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
38.89
Max
88.89
Std Dev
13.62
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking60.95
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
28.57
Max
85.71
Std Dev
15.33
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy60.56
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
27.78
Max
77.78
Std Dev
15.41
SCIENCE
Problem Solving60.48
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
33.33
Max
71.43
Std Dev
10.45
SCIENCE
Information Literacy51.67
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
22.22
Max
72.22
Std Dev
14.07
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Academia de Sophia International Inc. | 10 | 65.05% | 0% (0) | 10% (1) | 80% (8) | 10% (1) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Academia de Sophia International Inc.
10 examinees65.05%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
10% (1)
Nearly Proficient
80% (8)
Proficient
10% (1)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)