NAT 2024 | Berkeley School, Inc.
41
Total Examinees
55.89%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
2.4%
Proficient & Above
(1 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
12 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
28 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 41 | 73.53% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
2.4% (1) |
39% (16) |
48.8% (20) |
9.8% (4) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 41 | 67.73% | Nearly Proficient |
7.3% (3) |
2.4% (1) |
43.9% (18) |
46.3% (19) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 41 | 61.23% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
17.1% (7) |
70.7% (29) |
12.2% (5) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 41 | 56.31% | Nearly Proficient |
7.3% (3) |
26.8% (11) |
56.1% (23) |
9.8% (4) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 41 | 52.4% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
36.6% (15) |
61% (25) |
2.4% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 41 | 47.56% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
58.5% (24) |
41.5% (17) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 41 | 44.32% | Low Proficient |
9.8% (4) |
53.7% (22) |
36.6% (15) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 41 | 44.04% | Low Proficient |
9.8% (4) |
46.3% (19) |
43.9% (18) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
41 examinees73.53%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 2.4%
NeP: 39%
P: 48.8%
HP: 9.8%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
41 examinees67.73%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.3%
LoP: 2.4%
NeP: 43.9%
P: 46.3%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
41 examinees61.23%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 17.1%
NeP: 70.7%
P: 12.2%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
41 examinees56.31%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.3%
LoP: 26.8%
NeP: 56.1%
P: 9.8%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
41 examinees52.4%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 36.6%
NeP: 61%
P: 2.4%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
41 examinees47.56%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 58.5%
NeP: 41.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
41 examinees44.32%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 9.8%
LoP: 53.7%
NeP: 36.6%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
41 examinees44.04%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 9.8%
LoP: 46.3%
NeP: 43.9%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
74.26%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
69.38%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
68.16%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
67.03%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
63.78%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
60.16%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
52.84%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
52.03%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
52.03%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 89.43 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 50 | 100 | 13.65 |
| Understand The Problem | 86.18 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 50 | 100 | 16.42 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 82.52 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 14.7 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 82.12 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.61 |
| Evaluate Sources | 71.54 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.48 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 68.29 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.5 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 65.85 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 100 | 20.88 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 60.16 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.76 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 54.47 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.28 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluate Sources | 77.24 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.93 |
| Execute Strategy | 75.61 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.38 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 65.04 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.45 |
| Understand The Problem | 64.63 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.58 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 60.98 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.44 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 55.28 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 37.26 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 53.66 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.16 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 47.56 | Average Mastery | 0 | 75 | 19.84 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 40.65 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.06 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 75.61 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 20.53 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 61.25 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 16.49 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 57.72 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.72 |
| Understand The Problem | 57.32 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.71 |
| Evaluate Sources | 55.69 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 21.02 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 51.22 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.81 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 47.97 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.15 |
| Execute Strategy | 36.04 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 15.28 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 32.52 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 20.81 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance89.43
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
13.65
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance86.18
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
16.42
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance82.52
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
14.7
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance82.12
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.61
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance71.54
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.48
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance68.29
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.5
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance65.85
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
100
Std Dev
20.88
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance60.16
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.76
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance54.47
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.28
HUMANITIES
9 domainsEvaluate Sources
Domain Performance77.24
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.93
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance75.61
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.38
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance65.04
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.45
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance64.63
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.58
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance60.98
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.44
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance55.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
37.26
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance53.66
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.16
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance47.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
75
Std Dev
19.84
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance40.65
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.06
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance75.61
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
20.53
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance61.25
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
16.49
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance57.72
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.72
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance57.32
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.71
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance55.69
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
21.02
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance51.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.81
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance47.97
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.15
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance36.04
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.28
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance32.52
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
20.81
21st Century Skills Performance Berkeley School, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Berkeley School, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects69.32
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects59.16
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects54.47
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 53.8% | 72.2% | 51.5% | 59.2% |
| Information Literacy | 51.8% | 59.4% | 52.3% | 54.5% |
| Problem Solving | 67.9% | 86.7% | 53.4% | 69.3% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 86.67 | Competent | 53.33 | 100 | 12.84 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 72.24 | Developing | 33.33 | 100 | 16.86 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 67.85 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 23.16 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 59.35 | Emerging | 16.67 | 100 | 21.48 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 53.79 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 21.51 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 53.43 | Emerging | 28.57 | 80.95 | 13.07 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 52.3 | Emerging | 11.11 | 88.89 | 17.48 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 51.76 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 21.27 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 51.45 | Emerging | 33.33 | 76.19 | 11.58 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving86.67
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
53.33
Max
100
Std Dev
12.84
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking72.24
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
16.86
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving67.85
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.16
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy59.35
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
21.48
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking53.79
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.51
SCIENCE
Problem Solving53.43
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
28.57
Max
80.95
Std Dev
13.07
SCIENCE
Information Literacy52.3
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
11.11
Max
88.89
Std Dev
17.48
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy51.76
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.27
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking51.45
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
76.19
Std Dev
11.58
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Berkeley School, Inc. | 41 | 55.89% | 0% (0) | 29.3% (12) | 68.3% (28) | 2.4% (1) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Berkeley School, Inc.
41 examinees55.89%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
29.3% (12)
Nearly Proficient
68.3% (28)
Proficient
2.4% (1)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)