NAT 2024 | Pines City Colleges
29
Total Examinees
52.7%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
14 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
15 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 29 | 66.67% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
6.9% (2) |
58.6% (17) |
31% (9) |
3.4% (1) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 29 | 64.44% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
20.7% (6) |
51.7% (15) |
27.6% (8) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 29 | 54.88% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
34.5% (10) |
65.5% (19) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 29 | 51.5% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
51.7% (15) |
48.3% (14) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 29 | 51.41% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
48.3% (14) |
51.7% (15) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 29 | 46.9% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
62.1% (18) |
34.5% (10) |
3.4% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 29 | 44.51% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
65.5% (19) |
34.5% (10) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 29 | 41.32% | Low Proficient |
6.9% (2) |
65.5% (19) |
27.6% (8) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
29 examinees66.67%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 6.9%
NeP: 58.6%
P: 31%
HP: 3.4%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
29 examinees64.44%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 20.7%
NeP: 51.7%
P: 27.6%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
29 examinees54.88%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 34.5%
NeP: 65.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
29 examinees51.5%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 51.7%
NeP: 48.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
29 examinees51.41%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 48.3%
NeP: 51.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
29 examinees46.9%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 62.1%
NeP: 34.5%
P: 3.4%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
29 examinees44.51%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 65.5%
NeP: 34.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
29 examinees41.32%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.9%
LoP: 65.5%
NeP: 27.6%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
68.01%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
67.05%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
60.54%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
58.05%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
57.82%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
57.47%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
44.64%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
45.02%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
44.64%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 91.95 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 50 | 100 | 14.26 |
| Understand The Problem | 75.86 | Moving Towards Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 17.82 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 74.71 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 22.58 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 74.71 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 25.75 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 71.27 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 16.89 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 60.15 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 100 | 23.62 |
| Evaluate Sources | 58.62 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 22.58 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 54.02 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.06 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 43.68 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.49 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 78.16 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 21.93 |
| Evaluate Sources | 73.56 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 23.78 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 57.47 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 22.57 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 55.75 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 18.71 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 51.72 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 37.74 |
| Understand The Problem | 48.28 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 35.92 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 47.13 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 19.61 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 46.26 | Average Mastery | 8.33 | 91.67 | 19.52 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 32.76 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.52 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 71.84 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.13 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 55.94 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 88.89 | 19.02 |
| Evaluate Sources | 49.43 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 21.66 |
| Understand The Problem | 48.28 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 20.69 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 48.28 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 26.02 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 43.68 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.49 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 43.1 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 24.57 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 33.91 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 16.07 |
| Execute Strategy | 31.03 | Low Mastery | 0 | 55.56 | 14.99 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance91.95
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
14.26
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance75.86
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
17.82
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance74.71
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
22.58
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance74.71
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
25.75
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance71.27
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
16.89
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance60.15
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
100
Std Dev
23.62
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance58.62
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
22.58
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance54.02
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.06
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance43.68
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.49
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance78.16
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
21.93
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance73.56
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
23.78
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance57.47
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.57
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance55.75
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.71
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance51.72
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
37.74
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance48.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
35.92
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance47.13
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.61
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance46.26
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
8.33
Max
91.67
Std Dev
19.52
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance32.76
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.52
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance71.84
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.13
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance55.94
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
88.89
Std Dev
19.02
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance49.43
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.66
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance48.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.69
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance48.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
26.02
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance43.68
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.49
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance43.1
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
24.57
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance33.91
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.07
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance31.03
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
55.56
Std Dev
14.99
21st Century Skills Performance Pines City Colleges
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Pines City Colleges
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects63.71
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects54.13
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects48.08
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 51.7% | 62.9% | 47.8% | 54.1% |
| Information Literacy | 45.2% | 54.0% | 45.0% | 48.1% |
| Problem Solving | 61.4% | 82.1% | 47.6% | 63.7% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 82.07 | Competent | 46.67 | 100 | 11.63 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 62.89 | Developing | 33.33 | 95.24 | 16.79 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 61.44 | Developing | 18.18 | 90.91 | 18.9 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 54.02 | Emerging | 25 | 83.33 | 18.13 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 51.72 | Emerging | 16.67 | 83.33 | 17.57 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 47.78 | Emerging | 19.05 | 71.43 | 12.28 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 47.62 | Emerging | 23.81 | 71.43 | 12.69 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 45.21 | Emerging | 16.67 | 77.78 | 15.63 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 45.02 | Emerging | 11.11 | 88.89 | 19.04 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving82.07
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
46.67
Max
100
Std Dev
11.63
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking62.89
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
33.33
Max
95.24
Std Dev
16.79
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving61.44
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
18.18
Max
90.91
Std Dev
18.9
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy54.02
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
25
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.13
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking51.72
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
17.57
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking47.78
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
19.05
Max
71.43
Std Dev
12.28
SCIENCE
Problem Solving47.62
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
23.81
Max
71.43
Std Dev
12.69
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy45.21
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
77.78
Std Dev
15.63
SCIENCE
Information Literacy45.02
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
11.11
Max
88.89
Std Dev
19.04
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pines City Colleges | 29 | 52.7% | 0% (0) | 48.3% (14) | 51.7% (15) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Pines City Colleges
29 examinees52.7%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
48.3% (14)
Nearly Proficient
51.7% (15)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)