NAT 2024 | University of Baguio Science High School
188
Total Examinees
62.01%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
4.3%
Proficient & Above
(8 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
17 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
162 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
8 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 188 | 77.48% | Proficient |
1.1% (2) |
2.1% (4) |
28.7% (54) |
56.9% (107) |
11.2% (21) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 188 | 74.97% | Nearly Proficient |
2.7% (5) |
2.1% (4) |
30.9% (58) |
59% (111) |
5.3% (10) |
| LITERACY | 188 | 66.66% | Nearly Proficient |
2.1% (4) |
2.1% (4) |
69.1% (130) |
26.6% (50) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 188 | 61.03% | Nearly Proficient |
2.7% (5) |
10.1% (19) |
77.7% (146) |
9.6% (18) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 188 | 57.8% | Nearly Proficient |
1.1% (2) |
16.5% (31) |
78.7% (148) |
3.7% (7) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 188 | 55.3% | Nearly Proficient |
3.7% (7) |
22.3% (42) |
70.7% (133) |
3.2% (6) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 188 | 52.88% | Nearly Proficient |
2.1% (4) |
27.1% (51) |
70.7% (133) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 188 | 49.99% | Low Proficient |
3.7% (7) |
41.5% (78) |
52.7% (99) |
2.1% (4) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
188 examinees77.48%
P
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.1%
LoP: 2.1%
NeP: 28.7%
P: 56.9%
HP: 11.2%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
188 examinees74.97%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.7%
LoP: 2.1%
NeP: 30.9%
P: 59%
HP: 5.3%
LITERACY
188 examinees66.66%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.1%
LoP: 2.1%
NeP: 69.1%
P: 26.6%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
188 examinees61.03%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.7%
LoP: 10.1%
NeP: 77.7%
P: 9.6%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
188 examinees57.8%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.1%
LoP: 16.5%
NeP: 78.7%
P: 3.7%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
188 examinees55.3%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.7%
LoP: 22.3%
NeP: 70.7%
P: 3.2%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
188 examinees52.88%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.1%
LoP: 27.1%
NeP: 70.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
188 examinees49.99%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.7%
LoP: 41.5%
NeP: 52.7%
P: 2.1%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
77.6%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
75.8%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
71.63%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
70.69%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
67.9%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
67.41%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
55.11%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
57.54%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
55.11%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 93.17 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 0 | 100 | 14.76 |
| Understand The Problem | 87.32 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 0 | 100 | 18.52 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 84.57 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.33 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 84.4 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.85 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 79.08 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.72 |
| Evaluate Sources | 75.09 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.64 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 71.57 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.52 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 61.53 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.78 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 59.84 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.98 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 83.69 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.69 |
| Evaluate Sources | 83.16 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.61 |
| Understand The Problem | 68.88 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.85 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 68.44 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.12 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 67.38 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.69 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 67.38 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.79 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 57.45 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.07 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 51.99 | Average Mastery | 0 | 91.67 | 16.93 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 40.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.5 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 79.96 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 18.61 |
| Evaluate Sources | 69.15 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.6 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 67.14 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 18.47 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 63.03 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.81 |
| Understand The Problem | 58.69 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 18.63 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 55.76 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.43 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 55.32 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.98 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 42.55 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.14 |
| Execute Strategy | 35.22 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 13.81 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance93.17
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
14.76
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance87.32
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.52
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance84.57
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.33
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance84.4
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.85
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance79.08
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.72
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance75.09
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.64
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance71.57
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.52
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance61.53
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.78
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance59.84
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.98
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance83.69
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.69
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance83.16
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.61
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance68.88
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.85
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance68.44
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.12
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance67.38
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.69
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance67.38
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.79
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance57.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.07
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance51.99
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
91.67
Std Dev
16.93
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance40.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.5
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance79.96
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.61
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance69.15
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.6
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance67.14
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.47
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance63.03
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.81
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance58.69
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.63
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance55.76
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.43
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance55.32
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.98
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance42.55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.14
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance35.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.81
21st Century Skills Performance University of Baguio Science High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
University of Baguio Science High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects72.16
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects65.58
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects59.44
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 59.8% | 76.3% | 60.7% | 65.6% |
| Information Literacy | 55.2% | 65.1% | 58.0% | 59.4% |
| Problem Solving | 72.7% | 89.1% | 54.7% | 72.2% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 89.08 | Competent | 0 | 100 | 13.75 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 76.29 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 17.91 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 72.68 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 17.53 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 65.07 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 17.37 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 60.69 | Developing | 0 | 90.48 | 15.6 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 59.75 | Emerging | 0 | 94.44 | 17 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 58.04 | Emerging | 0 | 94.44 | 16.19 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 55.2 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 15.33 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 54.71 | Emerging | 0 | 80.95 | 11.51 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving89.08
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
13.75
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking76.29
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.91
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving72.68
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.53
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy65.07
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.37
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking60.69
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
90.48
Std Dev
15.6
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking59.75
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
94.44
Std Dev
17
SCIENCE
Information Literacy58.04
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
94.44
Std Dev
16.19
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy55.2
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
15.33
SCIENCE
Problem Solving54.71
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
11.51
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Baguio Science High School | 188 | 62.01% | 0.5% (1) | 9% (17) | 86.2% (162) | 4.3% (8) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
University of Baguio Science High School
188 examinees62.01%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0.5% (1)
Low Proficient
9% (17)
Nearly Proficient
86.2% (162)
Proficient
4.3% (8)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)