NAT 2024 | Yesu Maeul Christian Academy
7
Total Examinees
53.77%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
3 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
4 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 7 | 67.56% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
14.3% (1) |
42.9% (3) |
42.9% (3) |
0% (0) |
| PHILOSOPHY | 7 | 66.37% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
14.3% (1) |
42.9% (3) |
42.9% (3) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 7 | 57.67% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
42.9% (3) |
42.9% (3) |
14.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 7 | 55.06% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
28.6% (2) |
71.4% (5) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 7 | 53.49% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
28.6% (2) |
71.4% (5) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 7 | 46.19% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
57.1% (4) |
42.9% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 7 | 45.77% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
57.1% (4) |
42.9% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 7 | 38.01% | Low Proficient |
14.3% (1) |
71.4% (5) |
14.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
7 examinees67.56%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 14.3%
NeP: 42.9%
P: 42.9%
HP: 0%
PHILOSOPHY
7 examinees66.37%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 14.3%
NeP: 42.9%
P: 42.9%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
7 examinees57.67%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 42.9%
NeP: 42.9%
P: 14.3%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
7 examinees55.06%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 28.6%
NeP: 71.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
7 examinees53.49%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 28.6%
NeP: 71.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
7 examinees46.19%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 57.1%
NeP: 42.9%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
7 examinees45.77%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 57.1%
NeP: 42.9%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
7 examinees38.01%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 14.3%
LoP: 71.4%
NeP: 14.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
70.1%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
65.08%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
63.5%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
59.52%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
58.73%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
58.47%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
46.83%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
41.27%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
41.27%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 88.09 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 11.66 |
| Understand The Problem | 80.95 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 20.76 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 78.57 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 14.68 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 76.19 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.34 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 63.49 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 100 | 28.92 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 61.91 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.99 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 57.14 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 23.33 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 47.62 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 66.67 | 10.65 |
| Evaluate Sources | 42.86 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 17.5 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 85.72 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 16.49 |
| Evaluate Sources | 80.95 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 16.49 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 64.28 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 20.76 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 61.91 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 66.67 | 11.67 |
| Understand The Problem | 50 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.73 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 47.62 | Average Mastery | 25 | 66.67 | 12.37 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 47.62 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.12 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 42.86 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 15.06 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 30.95 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 20.76 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.92 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 54.76 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 17.17 |
| Evaluate Sources | 54.76 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 17.17 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 50 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 23.57 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 49.21 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 77.78 | 15.55 |
| Understand The Problem | 45.24 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 14.68 |
| Execute Strategy | 36.5 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 44.44 | 5.02 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 35.71 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 13.88 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 26.19 | Low Mastery | 0 | 50 | 19.63 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance88.09
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
11.66
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance80.95
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
20.76
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance78.57
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
14.68
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance76.19
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.34
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance63.49
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
100
Std Dev
28.92
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance61.91
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.99
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance57.14
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
23.33
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance47.62
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
10.65
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance42.86
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
17.5
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance85.72
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.49
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance80.95
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.49
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance64.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.76
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance61.91
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
11.67
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.73
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance47.62
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
25
Max
66.67
Std Dev
12.37
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance47.62
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.12
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance42.86
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.06
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance30.95
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
20.76
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.92
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance54.76
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
17.17
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance54.76
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
17.17
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
23.57
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance49.21
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
77.78
Std Dev
15.55
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance45.24
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14.68
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance36.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
44.44
Std Dev
5.02
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance35.71
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.88
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance26.19
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
50
Std Dev
19.63
21st Century Skills Performance Yesu Maeul Christian Academy
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Yesu Maeul Christian Academy
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects64.62
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects53.1
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects50
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 53.2% | 61.9% | 44.2% | 53.1% |
| Information Literacy | 46.0% | 57.1% | 46.8% | 50.0% |
| Problem Solving | 66.2% | 80.0% | 47.6% | 64.6% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 80 | Developing | 53.33 | 100 | 17.82 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 66.24 | Developing | 45.45 | 72.73 | 9.37 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 61.9 | Developing | 23.81 | 85.71 | 20.2 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 57.14 | Emerging | 25 | 75 | 16.32 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 53.17 | Emerging | 33.33 | 72.22 | 12.9 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 47.62 | Emerging | 28.57 | 57.14 | 8.82 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 46.83 | Emerging | 27.78 | 72.22 | 14.5 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 46.03 | Emerging | 27.78 | 66.67 | 15.63 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 44.22 | Emerging | 28.57 | 57.14 | 10.71 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving80
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
53.33
Max
100
Std Dev
17.82
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving66.24
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
45.45
Max
72.73
Std Dev
9.37
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking61.9
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
23.81
Max
85.71
Std Dev
20.2
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy57.14
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
25
Max
75
Std Dev
16.32
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking53.17
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
72.22
Std Dev
12.9
SCIENCE
Problem Solving47.62
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
28.57
Max
57.14
Std Dev
8.82
SCIENCE
Information Literacy46.83
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
27.78
Max
72.22
Std Dev
14.5
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy46.03
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
27.78
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.63
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking44.22
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
28.57
Max
57.14
Std Dev
10.71
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yesu Maeul Christian Academy | 7 | 53.77% | 0% (0) | 42.9% (3) | 57.1% (4) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Yesu Maeul Christian Academy
7 examinees53.77%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
42.9% (3)
Nearly Proficient
57.1% (4)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)