NAT 2024 | University of Baguio High School
611
Total Examinees
49.61%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0.5%
Proficient & Above
(3 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
45 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
232 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
331 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
3 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 611 | 61.71% | Nearly Proficient |
7.2% (44) |
13.3% (81) |
48.8% (298) |
27.7% (169) |
3.1% (19) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 611 | 60.47% | Nearly Proficient |
8% (49) |
14.2% (87) |
48.4% (296) |
27.5% (168) |
1.8% (11) |
| LITERACY | 611 | 53.73% | Nearly Proficient |
7.5% (46) |
20.8% (127) |
64.6% (395) |
7% (43) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 611 | 51.24% | Nearly Proficient |
7.2% (44) |
30.8% (188) |
58.9% (360) |
3.1% (19) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 611 | 47.98% | Low Proficient |
11.1% (68) |
33.2% (203) |
54% (330) |
1.6% (10) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 611 | 42.2% | Low Proficient |
9.2% (56) |
56.8% (347) |
33.4% (204) |
0.7% (4) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 611 | 42.05% | Low Proficient |
9.7% (59) |
56.6% (346) |
33.7% (206) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 611 | 37.5% | Low Proficient |
12.8% (78) |
68.7% (420) |
18.5% (113) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
611 examinees61.71%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.2%
LoP: 13.3%
NeP: 48.8%
P: 27.7%
HP: 3.1%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
611 examinees60.47%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 8%
LoP: 14.2%
NeP: 48.4%
P: 27.5%
HP: 1.8%
LITERACY
611 examinees53.73%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.5%
LoP: 20.8%
NeP: 64.6%
P: 7%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
611 examinees51.24%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.2%
LoP: 30.8%
NeP: 58.9%
P: 3.1%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
611 examinees47.98%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 11.1%
LoP: 33.2%
NeP: 54%
P: 1.6%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
611 examinees42.2%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 9.2%
LoP: 56.8%
NeP: 33.4%
P: 0.7%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
611 examinees42.05%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 9.7%
LoP: 56.6%
NeP: 33.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
611 examinees37.5%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 12.8%
LoP: 68.7%
NeP: 18.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
62.84%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
61.57%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
59.41%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
57.62%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
55.06%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
52.16%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
42.03%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
43.52%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
42.03%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 81.83 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.17 |
| Understand The Problem | 72.48 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.91 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 71.41 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.63 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 65.9 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.62 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 64.84 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.65 |
| Evaluate Sources | 56.44 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.61 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 54.74 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.41 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 49.86 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.53 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 42.39 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.73 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 74.96 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.55 |
| Evaluate Sources | 71.03 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.58 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 58.76 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.7 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 58.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.58 |
| Understand The Problem | 55.73 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 36.74 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 50.63 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.66 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 46.29 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.06 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 41.49 | Average Mastery | 0 | 91.67 | 19.04 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 37.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.42 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 58.35 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.26 |
| Evaluate Sources | 50.76 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.05 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 50.16 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.17 |
| Understand The Problem | 44.65 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.52 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 42.91 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.42 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 40.59 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.01 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 37.4 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.81 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 30.22 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.35 |
| Execute Strategy | 27.93 | Low Mastery | 0 | 77.78 | 15.93 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance81.83
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.17
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance72.48
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.91
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance71.41
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.63
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance65.9
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.62
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance64.84
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.65
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance56.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.61
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance54.74
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.41
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance49.86
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.53
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance42.39
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.73
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance74.96
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.55
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance71.03
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.58
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance58.76
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.7
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance58.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.58
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance55.73
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
36.74
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance50.63
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.66
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance46.29
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.06
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance41.49
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
91.67
Std Dev
19.04
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance37.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.42
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance58.35
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.26
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance50.76
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.05
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance50.16
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.17
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance44.65
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.52
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance42.91
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.42
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance40.59
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.01
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance37.4
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.81
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance30.22
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.35
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance27.93
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
77.78
Std Dev
15.93
21st Century Skills Performance University of Baguio High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
University of Baguio High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects60.01
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects50.23
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects46.01
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 47.9% | 58.1% | 44.6% | 50.2% |
| Information Literacy | 47.6% | 50.1% | 40.3% | 46.0% |
| Problem Solving | 62.6% | 76.0% | 41.4% | 60.0% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 76.01 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 25.7 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 62.63 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 22.89 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 58.11 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 24.58 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 50.14 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 21.8 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 47.94 | Emerging | 0 | 88.89 | 19.48 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 47.59 | Emerging | 0 | 94.44 | 18.71 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 44.63 | Emerging | 0 | 90.48 | 19.33 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 41.4 | Emerging | 0 | 80.95 | 17.05 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 40.3 | Emerging | 0 | 88.89 | 18.78 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving76.01
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.7
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving62.63
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.89
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking58.11
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.58
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy50.14
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.8
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking47.94
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
19.48
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy47.59
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
94.44
Std Dev
18.71
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking44.63
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
90.48
Std Dev
19.33
SCIENCE
Problem Solving41.4
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
17.05
SCIENCE
Information Literacy40.3
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
18.78
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Baguio High School | 611 | 49.61% | 7.4% (45) | 38% (232) | 54.2% (331) | 0.5% (3) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
University of Baguio High School
611 examinees49.61%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
7.4% (45)
Low Proficient
38% (232)
Nearly Proficient
54.2% (331)
Proficient
0.5% (3)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)