NAT 2024 | Small World Christian School Foundation
16
Total Examinees
59.54%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
4 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
12 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 16 | 78.13% | Proficient |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
18.8% (3) |
75% (12) |
6.3% (1) |
| PHILOSOPHY | 16 | 76.17% | Proficient |
0% (0) |
6.3% (1) |
25% (4) |
62.5% (10) |
6.3% (1) |
| LITERACY | 16 | 61.33% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
18.8% (3) |
62.5% (10) |
18.8% (3) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 16 | 58.78% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
18.8% (3) |
68.8% (11) |
12.5% (2) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 16 | 55.94% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
25% (4) |
75% (12) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 16 | 49.77% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
50% (8) |
50% (8) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 16 | 49.36% | Low Proficient |
6.3% (1) |
43.8% (7) |
50% (8) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 16 | 46.87% | Low Proficient |
6.3% (1) |
43.8% (7) |
50% (8) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
16 examinees78.13%
P
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 18.8%
P: 75%
HP: 6.3%
PHILOSOPHY
16 examinees76.17%
P
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 6.3%
NeP: 25%
P: 62.5%
HP: 6.3%
LITERACY
16 examinees61.33%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 18.8%
NeP: 62.5%
P: 18.8%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
16 examinees58.78%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 18.8%
NeP: 68.8%
P: 12.5%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
16 examinees55.94%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 25%
NeP: 75%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
16 examinees49.77%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 50%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
16 examinees49.36%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.3%
LoP: 43.8%
NeP: 50%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
16 examinees46.87%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.3%
LoP: 43.8%
NeP: 50%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
80.9%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
74.65%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
68.52%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
67.01%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
64.87%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
61.46%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
51.39%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
55.55%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
51.39%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 87.5 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.98 |
| Execute Strategy | 87.5 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 21.65 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 87.5 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 50 | 100 | 18.16 |
| Understand The Problem | 84.37 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 12.46 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 79.86 | Moving Towards Mastery | 44.44 | 100 | 15.32 |
| Evaluate Sources | 76.04 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 22.02 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 72.92 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 26.92 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 50 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.18 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 48.96 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 21.63 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 86.46 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 12.1 |
| Evaluate Sources | 62.5 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 20.83 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 59.72 | Average Mastery | 0 | 88.89 | 22.53 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 58.33 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.3 |
| Understand The Problem | 57.29 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 20.39 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 57.29 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 16.63 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 53.13 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 24.45 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 42.71 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 14.4 |
| Execute Strategy | 34.72 | Low Mastery | 0 | 55.56 | 14.63 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluate Sources | 85.42 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 16.53 |
| Execute Strategy | 83.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 23.57 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 68.75 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.43 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 60.41 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 24.21 |
| Understand The Problem | 59.38 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 40.38 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 58.33 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 18.63 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 56.25 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.8 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 47.4 | Average Mastery | 25 | 75 | 14.35 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 45.83 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 20.83 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance87.5
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.98
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance87.5
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
21.65
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance87.5
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
18.16
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance84.37
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
12.46
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance79.86
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
44.44
Max
100
Std Dev
15.32
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance76.04
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
22.02
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance72.92
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
26.92
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.18
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance48.96
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.63
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance86.46
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
12.1
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance62.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
20.83
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance59.72
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
22.53
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance58.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.3
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance57.29
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
20.39
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance57.29
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.63
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance53.13
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
24.45
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance42.71
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14.4
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance34.72
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
55.56
Std Dev
14.63
HUMANITIES
9 domainsEvaluate Sources
Domain Performance85.42
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.53
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance83.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
23.57
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance68.75
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.43
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance60.41
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
24.21
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance59.38
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
40.38
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance58.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.63
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance56.25
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.8
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance47.4
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
25
Max
75
Std Dev
14.35
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance45.83
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.83
21st Century Skills Performance Small World Christian School Foundation
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Small World Christian School Foundation
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects71.07
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects63.94
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects55.44
Moderate
Subjects:
SCIENCE
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 55.2% | 81.0% | 55.7% | 63.9% |
| Information Literacy | 54.9% | 55.2% | 56.3% | 55.4% |
| Problem Solving | 71.0% | 86.3% | 56.0% | 71.1% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 86.25 | Competent | 60 | 100 | 12.58 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 80.95 | Competent | 47.62 | 100 | 14.77 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 71.02 | Developing | 36.36 | 100 | 15.49 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 56.25 | Emerging | 27.78 | 77.78 | 14.68 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 55.95 | Emerging | 33.33 | 76.19 | 9.89 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 55.65 | Emerging | 19.05 | 76.19 | 13.23 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 55.21 | Emerging | 16.67 | 83.33 | 18.13 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 55.21 | Emerging | 33.33 | 83.33 | 13.53 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 54.86 | Emerging | 33.33 | 77.78 | 13.59 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving86.25
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
60
Max
100
Std Dev
12.58
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking80.95
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
47.62
Max
100
Std Dev
14.77
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving71.02
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
36.36
Max
100
Std Dev
15.49
SCIENCE
Information Literacy56.25
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
27.78
Max
77.78
Std Dev
14.68
SCIENCE
Problem Solving55.95
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
76.19
Std Dev
9.89
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking55.65
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
19.05
Max
76.19
Std Dev
13.23
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy55.21
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.13
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking55.21
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
13.53
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy54.86
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
77.78
Std Dev
13.59
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Small World Christian School Foundation | 16 | 59.54% | 0% (0) | 25% (4) | 75% (12) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Small World Christian School Foundation
16 examinees59.54%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
25% (4)
Nearly Proficient
75% (12)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)