NAT 2024 | Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Montessori, Inc.
12
Total Examinees
48.26%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
8 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
4 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 12 | 61.46% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
16.7% (2) |
50% (6) |
33.3% (4) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 12 | 60.94% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
16.7% (2) |
58.3% (7) |
25% (3) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 12 | 51.04% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
33.3% (4) |
66.7% (8) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 12 | 49.47% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
50% (6) |
50% (6) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 12 | 45.22% | Low Proficient |
25% (3) |
33.3% (4) |
33.3% (4) |
8.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 12 | 41.53% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
83.3% (10) |
16.7% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 12 | 41.51% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
83.3% (10) |
16.7% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 12 | 34.89% | Low Proficient |
16.7% (2) |
83.3% (10) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
12 examinees61.46%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 16.7%
NeP: 50%
P: 33.3%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
12 examinees60.94%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 16.7%
NeP: 58.3%
P: 25%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
12 examinees51.04%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
12 examinees49.47%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 50%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
12 examinees45.22%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 25%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 8.3%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
12 examinees41.53%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 83.3%
NeP: 16.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
12 examinees41.51%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 83.3%
NeP: 16.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
12 examinees34.89%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 16.7%
LoP: 83.3%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
64.51%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
62.97%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
58.33%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
57.41%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
52.16%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
50%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
41.21%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
41.67%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
41.21%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 86.11 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 50 | 100 | 16.43 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 75 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.84 |
| Understand The Problem | 70.83 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.39 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 27.22 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 23.57 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 54.63 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 77.78 | 18.4 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 50 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.92 |
| Evaluate Sources | 48.61 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 28.43 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 41.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 24.06 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 77.78 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.33 |
| Evaluate Sources | 69.45 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 25.31 |
| Understand The Problem | 58.33 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.36 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 56.95 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 17.29 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 55.56 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 36.85 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 52.78 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 21.34 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 43.06 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.79 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 38.89 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 17.79 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 36.11 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 16.43 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 65.28 | Average Mastery | 50 | 83.33 | 12.65 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 50.93 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 88.89 | 18.96 |
| Understand The Problem | 45.84 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 19.39 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 44.45 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 17.12 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 38.89 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 19.64 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 38.89 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 18.43 |
| Evaluate Sources | 31.95 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 22 |
| Execute Strategy | 29.63 | Low Mastery | 11.11 | 44.44 | 11.41 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 29.17 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.65 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance86.11
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
16.43
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance75
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.84
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance70.83
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.39
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
27.22
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
23.57
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance54.63
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
77.78
Std Dev
18.4
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.92
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance48.61
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
28.43
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
24.06
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.33
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance69.45
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
25.31
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance58.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.36
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance56.95
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
17.29
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
36.85
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance52.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.34
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance43.06
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.79
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance38.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
17.79
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance36.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.43
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance65.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
50
Max
83.33
Std Dev
12.65
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance50.93
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
88.89
Std Dev
18.96
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance45.84
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
19.39
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance44.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
17.12
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance38.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
19.64
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance38.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.43
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance31.95
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
22
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance29.63
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
44.44
Std Dev
11.41
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance29.17
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.65
21st Century Skills Performance Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Montessori, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Montessori, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects61.15
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects47.47
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects45.6
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 46.8% | 56.4% | 39.3% | 47.5% |
| Information Literacy | 44.0% | 52.1% | 40.7% | 45.6% |
| Problem Solving | 62.9% | 76.1% | 44.5% | 61.1% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 76.11 | Developing | 46.67 | 100 | 15.74 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 62.88 | Developing | 18.18 | 81.82 | 17.59 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 56.35 | Emerging | 14.29 | 80.95 | 20.56 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 52.08 | Emerging | 33.33 | 66.67 | 13.23 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 46.76 | Emerging | 33.33 | 88.89 | 17.04 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 44.45 | Emerging | 23.81 | 57.14 | 9.78 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 43.98 | Emerging | 16.67 | 66.67 | 14.78 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 40.74 | Emerging | 22.22 | 55.56 | 9.97 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 39.29 | Needs Support | 23.81 | 66.67 | 12.16 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving76.11
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
46.67
Max
100
Std Dev
15.74
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving62.88
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
18.18
Max
81.82
Std Dev
17.59
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking56.35
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
14.29
Max
80.95
Std Dev
20.56
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy52.08
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.23
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking46.76
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
88.89
Std Dev
17.04
SCIENCE
Problem Solving44.45
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
23.81
Max
57.14
Std Dev
9.78
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy43.98
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14.78
SCIENCE
Information Literacy40.74
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
22.22
Max
55.56
Std Dev
9.97
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking39.29
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
23.81
Max
66.67
Std Dev
12.16
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Montessori, Inc. | 12 | 48.26% | 0% (0) | 66.7% (8) | 33.3% (4) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Montessori, Inc.
12 examinees48.26%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
66.7% (8)
Nearly Proficient
33.3% (4)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)