NAT 2024 | Grace Bible Academy
3
Total Examinees
55.53%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
2 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 3 | 75% | Proficient |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
33.3% (1) |
66.7% (2) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 3 | 68.75% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
66.7% (2) |
33.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 3 | 59.72% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
100% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 3 | 55.32% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
33.3% (1) |
66.7% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 3 | 52.78% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
33.3% (1) |
66.7% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 3 | 48.15% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
33.3% (1) |
66.7% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 3 | 43.83% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
66.7% (2) |
33.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 3 | 40.68% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
100% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
3 examinees75%
P
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 66.7%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
3 examinees68.75%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 33.3%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
3 examinees59.72%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 100%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
3 examinees55.32%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
3 examinees52.78%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
3 examinees48.15%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
3 examinees43.83%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 66.7%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
3 examinees40.68%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
77.78%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
75.93%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
70.37%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
64.51%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
59.26%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
55.56%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
51.85%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
53.7%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
51.85%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability To Communicate Information | 100 | Mastered | 100 | 100 | 0 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 88.89 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 15.71 |
| Execute Strategy | 88.89 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 83.33 | 100 | 7.86 |
| Evaluate Sources | 83.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 23.57 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 77.78 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 83.33 | 7.85 |
| Understand The Problem | 72.22 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 83.33 | 7.85 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 27.22 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 83.33 | 13.61 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 55.56 | Average Mastery | 44.44 | 66.67 | 9.08 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluate Sources | 88.89 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 15.71 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 77.78 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 31.43 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 27.22 |
| Execute Strategy | 55.55 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 31.43 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 52.78 | Average Mastery | 50 | 58.33 | 3.93 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 50 | Average Mastery | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 44.44 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 50 | 7.86 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 44.44 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 66.67 | 15.72 |
| Understand The Problem | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 47.14 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 77.78 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 83.33 | 7.85 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 62.97 | Average Mastery | 55.56 | 66.67 | 5.24 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 61.11 | Average Mastery | 50 | 66.67 | 7.86 |
| Evaluate Sources | 61.11 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 28.33 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 55.56 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 66.67 | 15.72 |
| Understand The Problem | 50 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 66.67 | 13.61 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 44.44 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 66.67 | 15.72 |
| Execute Strategy | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 11.11 | 44.44 | 15.71 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 16.67 | 50 | 13.61 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsAbility To Communicate Information
Domain Performance100
Avg Score
Mastered
Min
100
Max
100
Std Dev
0
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance88.89
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
15.71
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance88.89
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
83.33
Max
100
Std Dev
7.86
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance83.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
23.57
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
7.85
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance72.22
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
7.85
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
27.22
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
83.33
Std Dev
13.61
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
44.44
Max
66.67
Std Dev
9.08
HUMANITIES
9 domainsEvaluate Sources
Domain Performance88.89
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
15.71
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
31.43
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
27.22
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance55.55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
31.43
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance52.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
50
Max
58.33
Std Dev
3.93
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
50
Max
50
Std Dev
0
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance44.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
50
Std Dev
7.86
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance44.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.72
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
47.14
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
7.85
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance62.97
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
55.56
Max
66.67
Std Dev
5.24
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance61.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
50
Max
66.67
Std Dev
7.86
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance61.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
28.33
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.72
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.61
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance44.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.72
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
44.44
Std Dev
15.71
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
50
Std Dev
13.61
21st Century Skills Performance Grace Bible Academy
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Grace Bible Academy
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Critical Thinking
3 subjects62.26
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects60.8
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving
3 subjects59.49
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 63.0% | 69.8% | 54.0% | 62.3% |
| Information Literacy | 53.7% | 75.0% | 53.7% | 60.8% |
| Problem Solving | 45.5% | 82.2% | 50.8% | 59.5% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 82.22 | Competent | 80 | 86.67 | 3.14 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 75 | Developing | 58.33 | 83.33 | 11.79 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 69.84 | Developing | 57.14 | 80.95 | 9.79 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 62.97 | Developing | 55.56 | 66.67 | 5.24 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 53.97 | Emerging | 38.1 | 66.67 | 11.88 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 53.71 | Emerging | 50 | 55.56 | 2.62 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 53.7 | Emerging | 38.89 | 72.22 | 13.86 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 50.79 | Emerging | 47.62 | 52.38 | 2.24 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 45.45 | Emerging | 36.36 | 63.64 | 12.86 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving82.22
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
80
Max
86.67
Std Dev
3.14
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy75
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
58.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
11.79
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking69.84
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
57.14
Max
80.95
Std Dev
9.79
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking62.97
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
55.56
Max
66.67
Std Dev
5.24
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking53.97
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
38.1
Max
66.67
Std Dev
11.88
SCIENCE
Information Literacy53.71
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
50
Max
55.56
Std Dev
2.62
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy53.7
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
38.89
Max
72.22
Std Dev
13.86
SCIENCE
Problem Solving50.79
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
47.62
Max
52.38
Std Dev
2.24
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving45.45
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
36.36
Max
63.64
Std Dev
12.86
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grace Bible Academy | 3 | 55.53% | 0% (0) | 33.3% (1) | 66.7% (2) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Grace Bible Academy
3 examinees55.53%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
33.3% (1)
Nearly Proficient
66.7% (2)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)