NAT 2024 | Good News Academy, Inc.
13
Total Examinees
42.97%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
9 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
4 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 13 | 55.13% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
38.5% (5) |
46.2% (6) |
15.4% (2) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 13 | 49.04% | Low Proficient |
7.7% (1) |
46.2% (6) |
38.5% (5) |
7.7% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 13 | 47.12% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
61.5% (8) |
38.5% (5) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 13 | 41.24% | Low Proficient |
7.7% (1) |
61.5% (8) |
30.8% (4) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 13 | 40.6% | Low Proficient |
7.7% (1) |
69.2% (9) |
23.1% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 13 | 40.17% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
84.6% (11) |
15.4% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 13 | 37.44% | Low Proficient |
15.4% (2) |
69.2% (9) |
15.4% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 13 | 32.98% | Low Proficient |
23.1% (3) |
61.5% (8) |
15.4% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
13 examinees55.13%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 38.5%
NeP: 46.2%
P: 15.4%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
13 examinees49.04%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.7%
LoP: 46.2%
NeP: 38.5%
P: 7.7%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
13 examinees47.12%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 61.5%
NeP: 38.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
13 examinees41.24%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.7%
LoP: 61.5%
NeP: 30.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
13 examinees40.6%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.7%
LoP: 69.2%
NeP: 23.1%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
13 examinees40.17%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 84.6%
NeP: 15.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
13 examinees37.44%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 15.4%
LoP: 69.2%
NeP: 15.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
13 examinees32.98%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 23.1%
LoP: 61.5%
NeP: 15.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
54.27%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
52.57%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
50.85%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
50%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
47.43%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
44.23%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
32.91%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
38.89%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
32.91%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability To Communicate Information | 74.36 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 23.22 |
| Execute Strategy | 65.38 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.63 |
| Understand The Problem | 65.38 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.32 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 58.12 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 100 | 21.86 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 56.41 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 24.93 |
| Evaluate Sources | 53.85 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 25.45 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 48.72 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.98 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 46.15 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 20.83 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 28.21 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 17.76 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.03 |
| Evaluate Sources | 56.41 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 40.05 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 51.28 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 16.62 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 46.15 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 24.59 |
| Understand The Problem | 38.46 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.78 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 35.26 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 16.39 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 23.57 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 32.05 | Low Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 20.11 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 30.77 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 20.51 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 62.82 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.06 |
| Evaluate Sources | 47.44 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 12.82 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 41.02 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 66.67 | 18.69 |
| Understand The Problem | 38.46 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.78 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 38.46 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 15.17 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 37.18 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 21.83 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 29.49 | Low Mastery | 0 | 50 | 17.48 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 28.2 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 18.93 |
| Execute Strategy | 20.51 | Low Mastery | 0 | 33.33 | 9.59 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsAbility To Communicate Information
Domain Performance74.36
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
23.22
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance65.38
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.63
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance65.38
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.32
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance58.12
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
100
Std Dev
21.86
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance56.41
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
24.93
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance53.85
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
25.45
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance48.72
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.98
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance46.15
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
20.83
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance28.21
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
17.76
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.03
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance56.41
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
40.05
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance51.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.62
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance46.15
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
24.59
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance38.46
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.78
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance35.26
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.39
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
23.57
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance32.05
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.11
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance30.77
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
20.51
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance62.82
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.06
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance47.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
12.82
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance41.02
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.69
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance38.46
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.78
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance38.46
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.17
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance37.18
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
21.83
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance29.49
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
50
Std Dev
17.48
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance28.2
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.93
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance20.51
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
33.33
Std Dev
9.59
21st Century Skills Performance Good News Academy, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Good News Academy, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects50.98
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects44.54
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects38.82
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 38.0% | 56.4% | 39.2% | 44.5% |
| Information Literacy | 37.2% | 44.2% | 35.0% | 38.8% |
| Problem Solving | 53.2% | 62.1% | 37.7% | 51.0% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 62.05 | Developing | 6.67 | 100 | 28.33 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 56.41 | Emerging | 38.1 | 85.71 | 12.78 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 53.15 | Emerging | 9.09 | 72.73 | 17.41 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 44.23 | Emerging | 25 | 75 | 12.82 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 39.19 | Needs Support | 19.05 | 57.14 | 12.27 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 38.03 | Needs Support | 16.67 | 61.11 | 13.93 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 37.73 | Needs Support | 14.29 | 61.9 | 16.54 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 37.18 | Needs Support | 11.11 | 83.33 | 18.15 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 35.04 | Needs Support | 11.11 | 55.56 | 12.96 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving62.05
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
6.67
Max
100
Std Dev
28.33
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking56.41
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
38.1
Max
85.71
Std Dev
12.78
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving53.15
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
9.09
Max
72.73
Std Dev
17.41
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy44.23
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
25
Max
75
Std Dev
12.82
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking39.19
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
19.05
Max
57.14
Std Dev
12.27
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking38.03
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
16.67
Max
61.11
Std Dev
13.93
SCIENCE
Problem Solving37.73
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
14.29
Max
61.9
Std Dev
16.54
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy37.18
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
11.11
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.15
SCIENCE
Information Literacy35.04
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
11.11
Max
55.56
Std Dev
12.96
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Good News Academy, Inc. | 13 | 42.97% | 0% (0) | 69.2% (9) | 30.8% (4) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Good News Academy, Inc.
13 examinees42.97%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
69.2% (9)
Nearly Proficient
30.8% (4)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)