NAT 2024 | Disciples for Christ Independent School Foundation, Inc.
12
Total Examinees
48.23%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
7 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
5 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 12 | 62.67% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
25% (3) |
33.3% (4) |
41.7% (5) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 12 | 54.17% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
41.7% (5) |
33.3% (4) |
25% (3) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 12 | 52.43% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
33.3% (4) |
66.7% (8) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 12 | 51.24% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
50% (6) |
50% (6) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 12 | 49.38% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
50% (6) |
50% (6) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 12 | 42.75% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
66.7% (8) |
33.3% (4) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 12 | 39.3% | Low Proficient |
8.3% (1) |
66.7% (8) |
25% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 12 | 33.9% | Low Proficient |
16.7% (2) |
75% (9) |
8.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
12 examinees62.67%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 25%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 41.7%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
12 examinees54.17%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 41.7%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 25%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
12 examinees52.43%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
12 examinees51.24%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 50%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
12 examinees49.38%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 50%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
12 examinees42.75%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 66.7%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
12 examinees39.3%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 8.3%
LoP: 66.7%
NeP: 25%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
12 examinees33.9%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 16.7%
LoP: 75%
NeP: 8.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
65.12%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
58.8%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
58.79%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
58.33%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
53.55%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
50.92%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
43.98%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
43.06%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
43.06%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 88.89 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 21.87 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 72.22 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 29.92 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 70.83 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 23.69 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 69.44 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 28.73 |
| Understand The Problem | 68.06 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.95 |
| Evaluate Sources | 56.94 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 30.01 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 52.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 37.16 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 52.78 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 88.89 | 24.9 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 40.28 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 23.03 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 80.56 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.73 |
| Evaluate Sources | 72.22 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 32.87 |
| Understand The Problem | 62.5 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 41.46 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 61.11 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 19.64 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 59.72 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 24.96 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 43.06 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 19.79 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 41.67 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 75 | 19.84 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 38.89 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 18.43 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 36.11 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.73 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identify Types Of Information | 48.61 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 19.79 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 48.15 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 66.67 | 18.34 |
| Evaluate Sources | 47.22 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 19.04 |
| Understand The Problem | 44.44 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.87 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 43.06 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 20.93 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 37.5 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 23.69 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 37.5 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 15.4 |
| Execute Strategy | 25.92 | Low Mastery | 0 | 55.56 | 17.76 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 23.61 | Low Mastery | 0 | 50 | 14.37 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance88.89
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
21.87
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance72.22
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
29.92
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance70.83
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
23.69
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance69.44
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
28.73
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance68.06
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.95
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance56.94
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
30.01
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance52.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
37.16
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance52.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
88.89
Std Dev
24.9
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance40.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
23.03
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance80.56
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.73
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance72.22
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
32.87
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance62.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
41.46
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance61.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.64
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance59.72
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
24.96
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance43.06
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
19.79
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
75
Std Dev
19.84
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance38.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.43
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance36.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.73
SCIENCE
9 domainsIdentify Types Of Information
Domain Performance48.61
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.79
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance48.15
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.34
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance47.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.04
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance44.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.87
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance43.06
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.93
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance37.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
23.69
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance37.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.4
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance25.92
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
55.56
Std Dev
17.76
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance23.61
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
50
Std Dev
14.37
21st Century Skills Performance Disciples for Christ Independent School Foundation, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Disciples for Christ Independent School Foundation, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects60
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects49.93
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects44.83
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 45.8% | 59.1% | 44.8% | 49.9% |
| Information Literacy | 47.2% | 50.7% | 36.6% | 44.8% |
| Problem Solving | 66.7% | 77.2% | 36.1% | 60.0% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 77.22 | Developing | 26.67 | 100 | 22.68 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 66.67 | Developing | 18.18 | 90.91 | 18.68 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 59.13 | Emerging | 23.81 | 90.48 | 23.69 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 50.69 | Emerging | 33.33 | 75 | 15.01 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 47.22 | Emerging | 16.67 | 77.78 | 16.43 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 45.83 | Emerging | 16.67 | 72.22 | 18.44 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 44.84 | Emerging | 23.81 | 66.67 | 11.24 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 36.57 | Needs Support | 11.11 | 61.11 | 16.27 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 36.11 | Needs Support | 14.29 | 61.9 | 12.96 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving77.22
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
26.67
Max
100
Std Dev
22.68
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving66.67
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
18.18
Max
90.91
Std Dev
18.68
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking59.13
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
23.81
Max
90.48
Std Dev
23.69
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy50.69
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
75
Std Dev
15.01
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy47.22
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
77.78
Std Dev
16.43
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking45.83
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
72.22
Std Dev
18.44
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking44.84
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
23.81
Max
66.67
Std Dev
11.24
SCIENCE
Information Literacy36.57
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
11.11
Max
61.11
Std Dev
16.27
SCIENCE
Problem Solving36.11
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
14.29
Max
61.9
Std Dev
12.96
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Disciples for Christ Independent School Foundation, Inc. | 12 | 48.23% | 0% (0) | 58.3% (7) | 41.7% (5) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Disciples for Christ Independent School Foundation, Inc.
12 examinees48.23%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
58.3% (7)
Nearly Proficient
41.7% (5)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)