NAT 2024 | Baguio Seventh Day Adventist School, Inc
30
Total Examinees
52.25%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
10 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
20 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 30 | 66.94% | Nearly Proficient |
3.3% (1) |
3.3% (1) |
56.7% (17) |
33.3% (10) |
3.3% (1) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 30 | 61.81% | Nearly Proficient |
3.3% (1) |
23.3% (7) |
40% (12) |
33.3% (10) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 30 | 53.26% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
33.3% (10) |
63.3% (19) |
3.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 30 | 52.55% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
43.3% (13) |
56.7% (17) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 30 | 50.43% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
43.3% (13) |
56.7% (17) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 30 | 45.56% | Low Proficient |
6.7% (2) |
50% (15) |
43.3% (13) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 30 | 44.01% | Low Proficient |
3.3% (1) |
56.7% (17) |
40% (12) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 30 | 43.46% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
76.7% (23) |
23.3% (7) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
30 examinees66.94%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.3%
LoP: 3.3%
NeP: 56.7%
P: 33.3%
HP: 3.3%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
30 examinees61.81%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.3%
LoP: 23.3%
NeP: 40%
P: 33.3%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
30 examinees53.26%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 63.3%
P: 3.3%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
30 examinees52.55%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 43.3%
NeP: 56.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
30 examinees50.43%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 43.3%
NeP: 56.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
30 examinees45.56%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.7%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 43.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
30 examinees44.01%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.3%
LoP: 56.7%
NeP: 40%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
30 examinees43.46%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 76.7%
NeP: 23.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
68.52%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
66.6%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
64.63%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
64.07%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
61.67%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
52.68%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
41.85%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
42.04%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
41.85%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understand The Problem | 86.67 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 21.26 |
| Execute Strategy | 86.11 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.76 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 83.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 20.64 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 78.89 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.87 |
| Evaluate Sources | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 23.57 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 63.33 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.93 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 60.37 | Average Mastery | 0 | 88.89 | 24.12 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 46.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.74 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 37.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 23.54 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 78.89 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 23.54 |
| Evaluate Sources | 74.44 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 26.78 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 64.44 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 20.06 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 63.33 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 17.43 |
| Understand The Problem | 55 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 35 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 54.45 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.41 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 46.11 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.23 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 41.39 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 15.13 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 32.78 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 18.5 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 57.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.46 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 53.33 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 77.78 | 18.01 |
| Understand The Problem | 52.22 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.25 |
| Evaluate Sources | 51.11 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.74 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 46.11 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.84 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 42.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.81 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 42.22 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.12 |
| Execute Strategy | 34.81 | Low Mastery | 11.11 | 66.67 | 14.83 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 31.11 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.06 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsUnderstand The Problem
Domain Performance86.67
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
21.26
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance86.11
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.76
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance83.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
20.64
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance78.89
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.87
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
23.57
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance63.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.93
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance60.37
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
24.12
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance46.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.74
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance37.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
23.54
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance78.89
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
23.54
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance74.44
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
26.78
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance64.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
20.06
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance63.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
17.43
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
35
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance54.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.41
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance46.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.23
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance41.39
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.13
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance32.78
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.5
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance57.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.46
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance53.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
77.78
Std Dev
18.01
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance52.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.25
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance51.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.74
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance46.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.84
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance42.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.81
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance42.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.12
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance34.81
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14.83
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance31.11
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.06
21st Century Skills Performance Baguio Seventh Day Adventist School, Inc
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Baguio Seventh Day Adventist School, Inc
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects66.27
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects52.81
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects47.13
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 49.1% | 63.0% | 46.4% | 52.8% |
| Information Literacy | 47.4% | 50.3% | 43.7% | 47.1% |
| Problem Solving | 66.7% | 85.8% | 46.4% | 66.3% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 85.78 | Competent | 26.67 | 100 | 16.75 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 66.67 | Developing | 36.36 | 100 | 15.81 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 63.02 | Developing | 4.76 | 95.24 | 20.38 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 50.28 | Emerging | 16.67 | 91.67 | 16.6 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 49.07 | Emerging | 22.22 | 72.22 | 14.06 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 47.41 | Emerging | 22.22 | 83.33 | 14.11 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 46.35 | Emerging | 9.52 | 71.43 | 14.8 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 46.35 | Emerging | 14.29 | 71.43 | 14.8 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 43.7 | Emerging | 22.22 | 66.67 | 13.96 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving85.78
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
26.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.75
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving66.67
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
36.36
Max
100
Std Dev
15.81
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking63.02
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
4.76
Max
95.24
Std Dev
20.38
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy50.28
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
91.67
Std Dev
16.6
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking49.07
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
22.22
Max
72.22
Std Dev
14.06
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy47.41
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
22.22
Max
83.33
Std Dev
14.11
SCIENCE
Problem Solving46.35
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
9.52
Max
71.43
Std Dev
14.8
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking46.35
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
14.29
Max
71.43
Std Dev
14.8
SCIENCE
Information Literacy43.7
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
22.22
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.96
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baguio Seventh Day Adventist School, Inc | 30 | 52.25% | 0% (0) | 33.3% (10) | 66.7% (20) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Baguio Seventh Day Adventist School, Inc
30 examinees52.25%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
33.3% (10)
Nearly Proficient
66.7% (20)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)