NAT 2024 | Baguio Patriotic High School

6
Total Examinees
50.74%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
2 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
4 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
Subject Examinees Avg MPS Proficiency Level Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
PHILOSOPHY 6 69.1% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
0%
(0)
66.7%
(4)
33.3%
(2)
0%
(0)
SOCIAL_SCIENCE 6 62.85% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
16.7%
(1)
66.7%
(4)
16.7%
(1)
0%
(0)
HUMANITIES 6 59.93% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
0%
(0)
100%
(6)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
LITERACY 6 50.35% Nearly Proficient 0%
(0)
50%
(3)
50%
(3)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
SCIENCE 6 46.67% Low Proficient 0%
(0)
66.7%
(4)
33.3%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
WIKA_AND_KOM 6 42.59% Low Proficient 0%
(0)
66.7%
(4)
33.3%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
LANG_AND_COM 6 41.36% Low Proficient 0%
(0)
66.7%
(4)
33.3%
(2)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
MATH 6 33.05% Low Proficient 33.3%
(2)
66.7%
(4)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
6 examinees
69.1%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 33.3%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
6 examinees
62.85%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 16.7%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 16.7%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
6 examinees
59.93%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 100%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
6 examinees
50.35%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 50%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
6 examinees
46.67%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 66.7%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
6 examinees
42.59%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 66.7%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
6 examinees
41.36%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 66.7%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
6 examinees
33.05%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 33.3%
LoP: 66.7%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart

About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.

How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.

Standard Benchmarks
  • 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
  • 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
  • 25-49% - Low Proficient
  • <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar

About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.

How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.

Performance Zones
  • Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
  • Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
  • Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
  • Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
71.3%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#2
66.97%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#3
66.67%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#4
66.67%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#5
58.64%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#6
54.63%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#7
53.7%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#8
50%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#9
50%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Execute Strategy 97.22 Mastered 83.33 100 6.21
Understand The Problem 77.78 Moving Towards Mastery 50 100 18.42
Analyzing Outcome 72.22 Moving Towards Mastery 33.33 100 29.92
Ability To Manage Information 72.22 Moving Towards Mastery 33.33 100 22.91
Analyzing Relevance 72.22 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 83.33 7.85
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 64.82 Average Mastery 44.44 100 18.61
Evaluate Sources 63.89 Average Mastery 50 83.33 11.45
Ability To Communicate Information 61.11 Average Mastery 33.33 100 22.91
Identify Types Of Information 41.67 Average Mastery 16.67 66.67 15.96
HUMANITIES 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Evaluate Sources 94.45 Closely Approximating Mastery 66.67 100 12.42
Execute Strategy 77.78 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 100 15.71
Understand The Problem 66.67 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 37.27
Identify Types Of Information 63.89 Average Mastery 50 83.33 14.96
Analyzing Outcome 61.11 Average Mastery 50 66.67 7.86
Ability To Communicate Information 61.11 Average Mastery 16.67 83.33 22.9
Analyzing Relevance 55.56 Average Mastery 41.67 66.67 9.21
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 44.45 Average Mastery 0 66.67 24.85
Ability To Manage Information 41.67 Average Mastery 16.67 66.67 20.97
SCIENCE 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Analyzing Outcome 66.67 Moving Towards Mastery 50 83.33 9.62
Understand The Problem 55.56 Average Mastery 33.33 66.67 12.43
Evaluate Sources 55.56 Average Mastery 33.33 66.67 12.43
Ability To Manage Information 50 Average Mastery 33.33 83.33 19.25
Analyzing Relevance 48.15 Average Mastery 33.33 66.67 12.29
Identify Types Of Information 44.45 Average Mastery 16.67 66.67 20.79
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 44.45 Average Mastery 16.67 66.67 15.71
Ability To Communicate Information 38.89 Average Mastery 16.67 66.67 15.71
Execute Strategy 25.92 Low Mastery 11.11 44.44 10.47
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domains
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
97.22
Avg Score
Mastered
Min 83.33
Max 100
Std Dev 6.21
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 50
Max 100
Std Dev 18.42
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
72.22
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 100
Std Dev 29.92
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
72.22
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 100
Std Dev 22.91
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
72.22
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 83.33
Std Dev 7.85
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
64.82
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 44.44
Max 100
Std Dev 18.61
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
63.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 83.33
Std Dev 11.45
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
61.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 100
Std Dev 22.91
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 15.96
HUMANITIES
9 domains
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
94.45
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 100
Std Dev 12.42
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 100
Std Dev 15.71
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 37.27
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
63.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 83.33
Std Dev 14.96
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
61.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 66.67
Std Dev 7.86
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
61.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 83.33
Std Dev 22.9
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 41.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 9.21
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
44.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 66.67
Std Dev 24.85
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 20.97
SCIENCE
9 domains
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 50
Max 83.33
Std Dev 9.62
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 66.67
Std Dev 12.43
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 66.67
Std Dev 12.43
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 83.33
Std Dev 19.25
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
48.15
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 66.67
Std Dev 12.29
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
44.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 20.79
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
44.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 15.71
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
38.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 15.71
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
25.92
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 11.11
Max 44.44
Std Dev 10.47
21st Century Skills Performance Baguio Patriotic High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Baguio Patriotic High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects
65.71
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects
58.69
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects
51.39
Moderate
Subjects:
HUMANITIES PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness

Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.

Skills HUMANITIES PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE Average
Critical Thinking 60.2% 66.7% 49.2% 58.7%
Information Literacy 55.6% 54.2% 44.5% 51.4%
Problem Solving 66.7% 84.4% 46.0% 65.7%
Low
High
Skill Performance
Subject Skill Avg Score Competency Level Min Max Std Dev
PHILOSOPHY Problem Solving 84.44 Competent 73.33 100 11.33
PHILOSOPHY Critical Thinking 66.67 Developing 52.38 80.95 9.91
HUMANITIES Problem Solving 66.67 Developing 63.64 72.73 4.29
HUMANITIES Critical Thinking 60.19 Developing 50 72.22 8.74
HUMANITIES Information Literacy 55.56 Emerging 44.44 77.78 12.83
PHILOSOPHY Information Literacy 54.17 Emerging 33.33 75 13.4
SCIENCE Critical Thinking 49.21 Emerging 38.1 61.9 7.61
SCIENCE Problem Solving 46.03 Emerging 33.33 61.9 8.55
SCIENCE Information Literacy 44.45 Emerging 27.78 66.67 12
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving
84.44
Strong
Competency: Competent
Min 73.33
Max 100
Std Dev 11.33
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking
66.67
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 52.38
Max 80.95
Std Dev 9.91
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving
66.67
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 63.64
Max 72.73
Std Dev 4.29
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking
60.19
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 50
Max 72.22
Std Dev 8.74
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
55.56
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 44.44
Max 77.78
Std Dev 12.83
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy
54.17
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 33.33
Max 75
Std Dev 13.4
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
49.21
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 38.1
Max 61.9
Std Dev 7.61
SCIENCE
Problem Solving
46.03
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 33.33
Max 61.9
Std Dev 8.55
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
44.45
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 27.78
Max 66.67
Std Dev 12
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Rank School Name Examinees Avg MPS Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
1 Baguio Patriotic High School 6 50.74% 0% (0) 33.3% (2) 66.7% (4) 0% (0) 0% (0)
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Baguio Patriotic High School
6 examinees
50.74%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient 0% (0)
Low Proficient 33.3% (2)
Nearly Proficient 66.7% (4)
Proficient 0% (0)
Highly Proficient 0% (0)