NAT 2024 | University of the Cordilleras Laboratory School
861
Total Examinees
50.66%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
0.3%
Proficient & Above
(3 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
28 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
362 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
468 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
3 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 861 | 64.41% | Nearly Proficient |
2.8% (24) |
13.5% (116) |
50.2% (432) |
30.9% (266) |
2.7% (23) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 861 | 60.63% | Nearly Proficient |
4.8% (41) |
19.6% (169) |
48.7% (419) |
25.8% (222) |
1.2% (10) |
| LITERACY | 861 | 53.83% | Nearly Proficient |
3.1% (27) |
31% (267) |
61.6% (530) |
4.3% (37) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 861 | 51.35% | Nearly Proficient |
3.9% (34) |
37.7% (325) |
56.8% (489) |
1.5% (13) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 861 | 48.78% | Low Proficient |
6.6% (57) |
40.2% (346) |
51.1% (440) |
2.1% (18) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 861 | 44.25% | Low Proficient |
5.1% (44) |
56.4% (486) |
38% (327) |
0.5% (4) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 861 | 43.25% | Low Proficient |
6.4% (55) |
60.2% (518) |
33.4% (288) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 861 | 38.8% | Low Proficient |
9.5% (82) |
72.4% (623) |
18% (155) |
0.1% (1) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
861 examinees64.41%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.8%
LoP: 13.5%
NeP: 50.2%
P: 30.9%
HP: 2.7%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
861 examinees60.63%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4.8%
LoP: 19.6%
NeP: 48.7%
P: 25.8%
HP: 1.2%
LITERACY
861 examinees53.83%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.1%
LoP: 31%
NeP: 61.6%
P: 4.3%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
861 examinees51.35%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.9%
LoP: 37.7%
NeP: 56.8%
P: 1.5%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
861 examinees48.78%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.6%
LoP: 40.2%
NeP: 51.1%
P: 2.1%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
861 examinees44.25%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.1%
LoP: 56.4%
NeP: 38%
P: 0.5%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
861 examinees43.25%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.4%
LoP: 60.2%
NeP: 33.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
861 examinees38.8%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 9.5%
LoP: 72.4%
NeP: 18%
P: 0.1%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
65.52%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
63.99%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
60.6%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
59.72%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
56.44%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
54.52%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
42.9%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
44.09%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
42.9%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 85.83 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.13 |
| Understand The Problem | 76.02 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.22 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 75.92 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.52 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 68.39 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.27 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 67.44 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.18 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 56.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.7 |
| Evaluate Sources | 56.77 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.48 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 52.57 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.91 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 45.16 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.6 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 77.62 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.54 |
| Evaluate Sources | 71.93 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.53 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 59.85 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 58.9 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.33 |
| Understand The Problem | 54.41 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.79 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 52.19 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.52 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 46.17 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.96 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 43.48 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 17.82 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 31.36 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.16 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 60.8 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.35 |
| Evaluate Sources | 53.1 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.47 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 51.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.87 |
| Understand The Problem | 48.74 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.76 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 44.77 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.16 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 42.97 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.52 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 40.94 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.65 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 30.82 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.24 |
| Execute Strategy | 28.52 | Low Mastery | 0 | 77.78 | 14.94 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance85.83
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.13
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance76.02
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.22
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance75.92
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.52
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance68.39
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.27
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance67.44
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.18
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance56.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.7
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance56.77
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.48
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance52.57
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.91
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance45.16
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.6
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance77.62
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.54
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance71.93
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.53
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance59.85
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance58.9
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.33
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance54.41
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.79
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance52.19
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.52
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance46.17
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.96
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance43.48
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
17.82
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance31.36
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.16
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance60.8
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.35
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance53.1
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.47
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance51.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.87
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance48.74
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.76
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance44.77
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.16
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance42.97
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.52
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance40.94
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.65
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance30.82
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.24
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance28.52
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
77.78
Std Dev
14.94
21st Century Skills Performance University of the Cordilleras Laboratory School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
University of the Cordilleras Laboratory School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects62.38
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects51.97
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects46.99
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 49.7% | 60.1% | 46.1% | 52.0% |
| Information Literacy | 45.5% | 52.6% | 42.9% | 47.0% |
| Problem Solving | 63.7% | 79.9% | 43.5% | 62.4% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 79.92 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 19.93 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 63.71 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 19.76 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 60.1 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 21.15 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 52.58 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 20.12 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 49.67 | Emerging | 0 | 88.89 | 17.98 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 46.13 | Emerging | 0 | 85.71 | 16.68 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 45.48 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 15.46 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 43.52 | Emerging | 0 | 80.95 | 15.09 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 42.9 | Emerging | 0 | 88.89 | 17.39 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving79.92
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.93
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving63.71
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.76
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking60.1
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.15
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy52.58
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.12
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking49.67
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
17.98
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking46.13
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
85.71
Std Dev
16.68
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy45.48
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
15.46
SCIENCE
Problem Solving43.52
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
15.09
SCIENCE
Information Literacy42.9
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
17.39
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of the Cordilleras Laboratory School | 861 | 50.66% | 3.3% (28) | 42% (362) | 54.4% (468) | 0.3% (3) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
University of the Cordilleras Laboratory School
861 examinees50.66%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
3.3% (28)
Low Proficient
42% (362)
Nearly Proficient
54.4% (468)
Proficient
0.3% (3)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)