NAT 2024 | Baguio City Science Foundation

Back to Dashboard
1
Total Examinees
33.08%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
Subject Examinees Avg MPS Proficiency Level Not Proficient
(0–24%)		 Low Proficient
(25–49%)		 Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)		 Proficient
(75–89%)		 Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
HUMANITIES 1 44.68% Low Proficient 0%
(0) 		100%
(1) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0)
LITERACY 1 39.58% Low Proficient 0%
(0) 		100%
(1) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0)
SCIENCE 1 36.67% Low Proficient 0%
(0) 		100%
(1) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0)
SOCIAL_SCIENCE 1 35.42% Low Proficient 0%
(0) 		100%
(1) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0)
LANG_AND_COM 1 29.63% Low Proficient 0%
(0) 		100%
(1) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0)
PHILOSOPHY 1 29.17% Low Proficient 0%
(0) 		100%
(1) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0)
MATH 1 25.42% Low Proficient 0%
(0) 		100%
(1) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0)
WIKA_AND_KOM 1 24.07% Not Proficient 100%
(1) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0) 		0%
(0)
Subject Performance
HUMANITIES
1 examinees
44.68%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
1 examinees
39.58%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
1 examinees
36.67%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
1 examinees
35.42%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
1 examinees
29.63%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
PHILOSOPHY
1 examinees
29.17%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
1 examinees
25.42%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
1 examinees
24.07%
NoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 100%
LoP: 0%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart

About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.

How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.

Standard Benchmarks
  • 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
  • 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
  • 25-49% - Low Proficient
  • <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar

About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.

How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.

Performance Zones
  • Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
  • Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
  • Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
  • Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
85.19%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#2
50%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#3
44.44%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#4
16.67%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#5
35.18%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#6
33.33%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#7
27.78%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#8
22.22%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#9
16.67%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Execute Strategy 100 Mastered 100 100 0
Analyzing Relevance 50 Average Mastery 50 50 0
Analyzing Outcome 33.33 Low Mastery 33.33 33.33 0
Ability To Manage Information 33.33 Low Mastery 33.33 33.33 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 22.22 Low Mastery 22.22 22.22 0
Understand The Problem 16.67 Low Mastery 16.67 16.67 0
Identify Types Of Information 0 Absolutely No Mastery 0 0 0
Ability To Communicate Information 0 Absolutely No Mastery 0 0 0
Evaluate Sources 0 Absolutely No Mastery 0 0 0
HUMANITIES 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Execute Strategy 100 Mastered 100 100 0
Evaluate Sources 100 Mastered 100 100 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 66.67 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 66.67 0
Analyzing Outcome 50 Average Mastery 50 50 0
Understand The Problem 50 Average Mastery 50 50 0
Ability To Manage Information 33.33 Low Mastery 33.33 33.33 0
Identify Types Of Information 33.33 Low Mastery 33.33 33.33 0
Analyzing Relevance 33.33 Low Mastery 33.33 33.33 0
Ability To Communicate Information 16.67 Low Mastery 16.67 16.67 0
SCIENCE 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Analyzing Outcome 66.67 Moving Towards Mastery 66.67 66.67 0
Execute Strategy 55.56 Average Mastery 55.56 55.56 0
Ability To Communicate Information 50 Average Mastery 50 50 0
Ability To Manage Information 33.33 Low Mastery 33.33 33.33 0
Evaluate Sources 33.33 Low Mastery 33.33 33.33 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 33.33 Low Mastery 33.33 33.33 0
Analyzing Relevance 22.22 Low Mastery 22.22 22.22 0
Understand The Problem 16.67 Low Mastery 16.67 16.67 0
Identify Types Of Information 16.67 Low Mastery 16.67 16.67 0
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domains
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
100
Avg Score
Mastered
Min 100
Max 100
Std Dev 0
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 50
Std Dev 0
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
22.22
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 22.22
Max 22.22
Std Dev 0
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
16.67
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 16.67
Std Dev 0
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
0
Avg Score
Absolutely No Mastery
Min 0
Max 0
Std Dev 0
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
0
Avg Score
Absolutely No Mastery
Min 0
Max 0
Std Dev 0
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
0
Avg Score
Absolutely No Mastery
Min 0
Max 0
Std Dev 0
HUMANITIES
9 domains
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
100
Avg Score
Mastered
Min 100
Max 100
Std Dev 0
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
100
Avg Score
Mastered
Min 100
Max 100
Std Dev 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 0
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 50
Std Dev 0
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 50
Std Dev 0
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
16.67
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 16.67
Std Dev 0
SCIENCE
9 domains
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 66.67
Max 66.67
Std Dev 0
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 55.56
Max 55.56
Std Dev 0
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 50
Max 50
Std Dev 0
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
22.22
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 22.22
Max 22.22
Std Dev 0
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
16.67
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 16.67
Std Dev 0
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
16.67
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 16.67
Std Dev 0
21st Century Skills Performance Baguio City Science Foundation
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Baguio City Science Foundation
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects
54.86
Moderate
Subjects:
HUMANITIES PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects
34.13
Needs Support
Subjects:
HUMANITIES SCIENCE PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy
3 subjects
23.15
Needs Support
Subjects:
SCIENCE HUMANITIES PHILOSOPHY
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness

Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.

Skills HUMANITIES PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE Average
Critical Thinking 50.0% 23.8% 28.6% 34.1%
Information Literacy 27.8% 8.3% 33.3% 23.1%
Problem Solving 63.6% 53.3% 47.6% 54.9%
Low
High
Skill Performance
Subject Skill Avg Score Competency Level Min Max Std Dev
HUMANITIES Problem Solving 63.64 Developing 63.64 63.64 0
PHILOSOPHY Problem Solving 53.33 Emerging 53.33 53.33 0
HUMANITIES Critical Thinking 50 Emerging 50 50 0
SCIENCE Problem Solving 47.62 Emerging 47.62 47.62 0
SCIENCE Information Literacy 33.33 Needs Support 33.33 33.33 0
SCIENCE Critical Thinking 28.57 Needs Support 28.57 28.57 0
HUMANITIES Information Literacy 27.78 Needs Support 27.78 27.78 0
PHILOSOPHY Critical Thinking 23.81 Needs Support 23.81 23.81 0
PHILOSOPHY Information Literacy 8.33 Needs Support 8.33 8.33 0
Skill Performance
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving
63.64
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 63.64
Max 63.64
Std Dev 0
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving
53.33
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 53.33
Max 53.33
Std Dev 0
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking
50
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 50
Max 50
Std Dev 0
SCIENCE
Problem Solving
47.62
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 47.62
Max 47.62
Std Dev 0
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
33.33
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 33.33
Max 33.33
Std Dev 0
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
28.57
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 28.57
Max 28.57
Std Dev 0
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
27.78
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 27.78
Max 27.78
Std Dev 0
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking
23.81
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 23.81
Max 23.81
Std Dev 0
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy
8.33
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 8.33
Max 8.33
Std Dev 0
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Rank School Name Examinees Avg MPS Not Proficient
(0–24%)		 Low Proficient
(25–49%)		 Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)		 Proficient
(75–89%)		 Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
1 Baguio City Science Foundation 1 33.08% 0% (0) 100% (1) 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (0)
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Baguio City Science Foundation
1 examinees
33.08%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient 0% (0)
Low Proficient 100% (1)
Nearly Proficient 0% (0)
Proficient 0% (0)
Highly Proficient 0% (0)