NAT 2024 | Baguio City Academy Colleges, Inc.
8
Total Examinees
49.1%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
5 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
3 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 8 | 68.49% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
12.5% (1) |
62.5% (5) |
25% (2) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 8 | 58.85% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
37.5% (3) |
37.5% (3) |
25% (2) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 8 | 52.6% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
25% (2) |
75% (6) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 8 | 49.2% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
50% (4) |
50% (4) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 8 | 45.37% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
62.5% (5) |
37.5% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 8 | 41.9% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
100% (8) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 8 | 41.46% | Low Proficient |
25% (2) |
50% (4) |
25% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 8 | 34.96% | Low Proficient |
25% (2) |
62.5% (5) |
12.5% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
8 examinees68.49%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 12.5%
NeP: 62.5%
P: 25%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
8 examinees58.85%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 37.5%
NeP: 37.5%
P: 25%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
8 examinees52.6%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 25%
NeP: 75%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
8 examinees49.2%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 50%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
8 examinees45.37%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 62.5%
NeP: 37.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
8 examinees41.9%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 100%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
8 examinees41.46%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 25%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 25%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
8 examinees34.96%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 25%
LoP: 62.5%
NeP: 12.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
69.68%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
61.11%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
56.02%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
55.56%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
54.86%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
54.86%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
53.47%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
43.05%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
43.05%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 93.75 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 83.33 | 100 | 8.07 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 83.34 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 16.67 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 79.17 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 23.2 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 79.17 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 23.2 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 77.08 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 14.28 |
| Understand The Problem | 70.83 | Moving Towards Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 24.65 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 61.11 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 88.89 | 16.67 |
| Evaluate Sources | 56.25 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 27.56 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 37.5 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 16.14 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 83.34 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 16.67 |
| Evaluate Sources | 62.5 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 38.86 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 58.33 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 16.67 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 58.33 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 14.43 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 47.92 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 19.43 |
| Understand The Problem | 43.75 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.97 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 43.75 | Average Mastery | 25 | 66.67 | 14.88 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 31.25 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 19.43 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 29.17 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.9 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 52.08 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 29.39 |
| Understand The Problem | 50 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 16.67 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 50 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 20.41 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 47.22 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 66.67 | 17.35 |
| Evaluate Sources | 45.84 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 23.2 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 35.42 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 15.45 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 25 |
| Execute Strategy | 31.94 | Low Mastery | 11.11 | 77.78 | 20.37 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 29.17 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 23.2 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance93.75
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
83.33
Max
100
Std Dev
8.07
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance83.34
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.67
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance79.17
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
23.2
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance79.17
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
23.2
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance77.08
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
14.28
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance70.83
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
24.65
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance61.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
88.89
Std Dev
16.67
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance56.25
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
27.56
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance37.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.14
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance83.34
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.67
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance62.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
38.86
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance58.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.67
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance58.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
14.43
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance47.92
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.43
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance43.75
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.97
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance43.75
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
25
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14.88
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance31.25
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
19.43
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance29.17
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.9
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance52.08
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
29.39
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.67
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.41
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance47.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
66.67
Std Dev
17.35
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance45.84
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
23.2
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance35.42
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.45
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
25
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance31.94
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
77.78
Std Dev
20.37
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance29.17
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
23.2
21st Century Skills Performance Baguio City Academy Colleges, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Baguio City Academy Colleges, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects60.73
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects50.73
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects48.38
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 44.5% | 64.3% | 43.5% | 50.7% |
| Information Literacy | 49.3% | 58.3% | 37.5% | 48.4% |
| Problem Solving | 56.8% | 82.5% | 42.9% | 60.7% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 82.5 | Competent | 60 | 93.33 | 11.99 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 64.29 | Developing | 42.86 | 90.48 | 15.06 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 58.33 | Emerging | 33.33 | 83.33 | 13.82 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 56.82 | Emerging | 36.36 | 81.82 | 12.66 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 49.3 | Emerging | 33.33 | 61.11 | 10.18 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 44.45 | Emerging | 27.78 | 77.78 | 16.2 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 43.45 | Emerging | 19.05 | 61.9 | 13.13 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 42.86 | Emerging | 19.05 | 57.14 | 13.26 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 37.5 | Needs Support | 11.11 | 61.11 | 16.14 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving82.5
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
60
Max
93.33
Std Dev
11.99
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking64.29
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
42.86
Max
90.48
Std Dev
15.06
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy58.33
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
13.82
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving56.82
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
36.36
Max
81.82
Std Dev
12.66
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy49.3
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
61.11
Std Dev
10.18
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking44.45
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
27.78
Max
77.78
Std Dev
16.2
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking43.45
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
19.05
Max
61.9
Std Dev
13.13
SCIENCE
Problem Solving42.86
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
19.05
Max
57.14
Std Dev
13.26
SCIENCE
Information Literacy37.5
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
11.11
Max
61.11
Std Dev
16.14
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baguio City Academy Colleges, Inc. | 8 | 49.1% | 0% (0) | 62.5% (5) | 37.5% (3) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Baguio City Academy Colleges, Inc.
8 examinees49.1%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
62.5% (5)
Nearly Proficient
37.5% (3)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)