NAT 2024 | Baguio Central University Inc
298
Total Examinees
46.21%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
5 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
193 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
99 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 298 | 60.63% | Nearly Proficient |
1.7% (5) |
17.4% (52) |
61.4% (183) |
17.8% (53) |
1.7% (5) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 298 | 51.36% | Nearly Proficient |
6.4% (19) |
40.3% (120) |
41.6% (124) |
11.1% (33) |
0.7% (2) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 298 | 48.15% | Low Proficient |
4.7% (14) |
44.3% (132) |
49.7% (148) |
1.3% (4) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 298 | 47.73% | Low Proficient |
1.3% (4) |
54.7% (163) |
43.6% (130) |
0.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 298 | 45.75% | Low Proficient |
4% (12) |
55.4% (165) |
40.3% (120) |
0.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 298 | 40.61% | Low Proficient |
5.4% (16) |
69.8% (208) |
24.8% (74) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 298 | 39.94% | Low Proficient |
5.7% (17) |
75.5% (225) |
18.8% (56) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 298 | 35.49% | Low Proficient |
13.8% (41) |
77.9% (232) |
8.4% (25) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
298 examinees60.63%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.7%
LoP: 17.4%
NeP: 61.4%
P: 17.8%
HP: 1.7%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
298 examinees51.36%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.4%
LoP: 40.3%
NeP: 41.6%
P: 11.1%
HP: 0.7%
WIKA_AND_KOM
298 examinees48.15%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4.7%
LoP: 44.3%
NeP: 49.7%
P: 1.3%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
298 examinees47.73%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.3%
LoP: 54.7%
NeP: 43.6%
P: 0.3%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
298 examinees45.75%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4%
LoP: 55.4%
NeP: 40.3%
P: 0.3%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
298 examinees40.61%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.4%
LoP: 69.8%
NeP: 24.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
298 examinees39.94%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.7%
LoP: 75.5%
NeP: 18.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
298 examinees35.49%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 13.8%
LoP: 77.9%
NeP: 8.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
65.08%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
61.13%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
56.54%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
55.02%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
52.24%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
50.84%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
40.25%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
39.62%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
39.62%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 85.12 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.94 |
| Understand The Problem | 76.06 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.38 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 72.26 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.82 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 66.89 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.11 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 64.15 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.24 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 51.68 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 50.9 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.06 |
| Evaluate Sources | 46.76 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.15 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 40.38 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.2 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 81.66 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.25 |
| Evaluate Sources | 62.3 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.49 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 61.97 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.6 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 57.49 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.39 |
| Understand The Problem | 48.83 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.62 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 39.99 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.51 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 38.81 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.71 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 38 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 17.55 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 30.76 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.76 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 53.64 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.55 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 50.37 | Average Mastery | 0 | 88.89 | 21.43 |
| Evaluate Sources | 47.65 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.42 |
| Understand The Problem | 44.74 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.8 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 40.38 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.99 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 37.19 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.41 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 36.19 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.55 |
| Execute Strategy | 28.45 | Low Mastery | 0 | 77.78 | 12.77 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 28.08 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.84 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance85.12
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.94
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance76.06
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.38
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance72.26
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.82
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance66.89
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.11
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance64.15
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.24
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance51.68
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance50.9
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.06
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance46.76
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.15
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance40.38
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.2
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance81.66
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.25
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance62.3
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.49
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance61.97
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.6
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance57.49
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.39
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance48.83
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.62
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance39.99
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.51
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance38.81
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.71
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance38
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
17.55
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance30.76
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.76
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance53.64
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.55
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance50.37
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
21.43
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance47.65
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.42
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance44.74
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.8
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance40.38
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.99
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance37.19
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.41
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance36.19
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.55
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance28.45
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
77.78
Std Dev
12.77
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance28.08
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.84
21st Century Skills Performance Baguio Central University Inc
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Baguio Central University Inc
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects60.58
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects46.41
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects43.93
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 42.2% | 53.8% | 43.2% | 46.4% |
| Information Literacy | 44.2% | 49.6% | 37.9% | 43.9% |
| Problem Solving | 62.5% | 78.9% | 40.3% | 60.6% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 78.93 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 18.38 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 62.51 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 17.15 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 53.83 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 18.43 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 49.64 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 17.46 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 44.24 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 14.52 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 43.22 | Emerging | 0 | 80.95 | 14.97 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 42.19 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 16.34 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 40.3 | Emerging | 0 | 71.43 | 12.96 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 37.92 | Needs Support | 0 | 83.33 | 15.47 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving78.93
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.38
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving62.51
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.15
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking53.83
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.43
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy49.64
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.46
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy44.24
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
14.52
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking43.22
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
14.97
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking42.19
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.34
SCIENCE
Problem Solving40.3
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
71.43
Std Dev
12.96
SCIENCE
Information Literacy37.92
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
15.47
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baguio Central University Inc | 298 | 46.21% | 1.7% (5) | 64.8% (193) | 33.2% (99) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Baguio Central University Inc
298 examinees46.21%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
1.7% (5)
Low Proficient
64.8% (193)
Nearly Proficient
33.2% (99)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)