NAT 2024 | STI College - Baguio

130
Total Examinees
47.11%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0.8%
Proficient & Above
(1 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
4 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
76 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
49 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
Subject Examinees Avg MPS Proficiency Level Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
PHILOSOPHY 130 59.62% Nearly Proficient 1.5%
(2)
22.3%
(29)
54.6%
(71)
19.2%
(25)
2.3%
(3)
SOCIAL_SCIENCE 130 53.69% Nearly Proficient 6.2%
(8)
30.8%
(40)
46.9%
(61)
14.6%
(19)
1.5%
(2)
LITERACY 130 50.38% Nearly Proficient 3.8%
(5)
38.5%
(50)
55.4%
(72)
2.3%
(3)
0%
(0)
HUMANITIES 130 47.81% Low Proficient 3.8%
(5)
50%
(65)
44.6%
(58)
1.5%
(2)
0%
(0)
WIKA_AND_KOM 130 46.28% Low Proficient 9.2%
(12)
43.8%
(57)
46.2%
(60)
0.8%
(1)
0%
(0)
SCIENCE 130 41.91% Low Proficient 3.1%
(4)
72.3%
(94)
23.8%
(31)
0.8%
(1)
0%
(0)
LANG_AND_COM 130 41.52% Low Proficient 3.8%
(5)
75.4%
(98)
20.8%
(27)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
MATH 130 35.66% Low Proficient 12.3%
(16)
78.5%
(102)
8.5%
(11)
0.8%
(1)
0%
(0)
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
130 examinees
59.62%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.5%
LoP: 22.3%
NeP: 54.6%
P: 19.2%
HP: 2.3%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
130 examinees
53.69%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.2%
LoP: 30.8%
NeP: 46.9%
P: 14.6%
HP: 1.5%
LITERACY
130 examinees
50.38%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.8%
LoP: 38.5%
NeP: 55.4%
P: 2.3%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
130 examinees
47.81%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.8%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 44.6%
P: 1.5%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
130 examinees
46.28%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 9.2%
LoP: 43.8%
NeP: 46.2%
P: 0.8%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
130 examinees
41.91%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.1%
LoP: 72.3%
NeP: 23.8%
P: 0.8%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
130 examinees
41.52%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.8%
LoP: 75.4%
NeP: 20.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
130 examinees
35.66%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 12.3%
LoP: 78.5%
NeP: 8.5%
P: 0.8%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart

About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.

How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.

Standard Benchmarks
  • 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
  • 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
  • 25-49% - Low Proficient
  • <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar

About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.

How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.

Performance Zones
  • Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
  • Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
  • Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
  • Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
63.12%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#2
61.81%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#3
56.2%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#4
55.26%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#5
52.95%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#6
50.13%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#7
40.08%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#8
40.81%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#9
40.08%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Execute Strategy 82.18 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 21.1
Analyzing Outcome 74.36 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 25.67
Understand The Problem 72.31 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 25.03
Ability To Communicate Information 63.08 Average Mastery 0 100 28.42
Analyzing Relevance 61.54 Average Mastery 0 100 23.19
Evaluate Sources 52.05 Average Mastery 0 100 24.02
Ability To Manage Information 51.28 Average Mastery 0 100 28.69
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 50 Average Mastery 0 100 24.08
Identify Types Of Information 39.49 Average Mastery 0 100 24.38
HUMANITIES 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Execute Strategy 73.85 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 25.48
Evaluate Sources 61.8 Average Mastery 0 100 33.11
Analyzing Outcome 56.8 Average Mastery 0 100 21.55
Ability To Communicate Information 54.49 Average Mastery 0 100 22.53
Understand The Problem 51.15 Average Mastery 0 100 37.45
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 47.18 Average Mastery 0 100 33.02
Identify Types Of Information 45.26 Average Mastery 0 83.33 21.41
Analyzing Relevance 40.06 Average Mastery 0 83.33 18.55
Ability To Manage Information 29.36 Low Mastery 0 100 18.35
SCIENCE 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Analyzing Outcome 58.21 Average Mastery 0 100 22.19
Evaluate Sources 51.92 Average Mastery 0 100 23.17
Analyzing Relevance 48.8 Average Mastery 0 100 20.93
Understand The Problem 45.13 Average Mastery 0 100 24.06
Ability To Communicate Information 41.28 Average Mastery 0 100 20.69
Ability To Manage Information 39.61 Average Mastery 0 83.33 22.95
Identify Types Of Information 37.69 Average Mastery 0 100 21.14
Execute Strategy 29.4 Low Mastery 0 66.67 15.77
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 27.95 Low Mastery 0 83.33 19.19
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domains
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
82.18
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 21.1
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
74.36
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 25.67
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
72.31
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 25.03
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
63.08
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 28.42
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
61.54
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 23.19
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
52.05
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 24.02
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
51.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 28.69
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 24.08
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
39.49
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 24.38
HUMANITIES
9 domains
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
73.85
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 25.48
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
61.8
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 33.11
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
56.8
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 21.55
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
54.49
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 22.53
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
51.15
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 37.45
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
47.18
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 33.02
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
45.26
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 21.41
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
40.06
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 18.55
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
29.36
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 18.35
SCIENCE
9 domains
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
58.21
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 22.19
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
51.92
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 23.17
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
48.8
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 20.93
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
45.13
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 24.06
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
41.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 20.69
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
39.61
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 22.95
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
37.69
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 21.14
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
29.4
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 66.67
Std Dev 15.77
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
27.95
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 19.19
21st Century Skills Performance STI College - Baguio
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
STI College - Baguio
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects
59.74
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects
47.5
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects
43.63
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness

Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.

Skills HUMANITIES PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE Average
Critical Thinking 44.9% 53.9% 43.7% 47.5%
Information Literacy 43.0% 48.3% 39.5% 43.6%
Problem Solving 60.4% 76.7% 42.1% 59.7%
Low
High
Skill Performance
Subject Skill Avg Score Competency Level Min Max Std Dev
PHILOSOPHY Problem Solving 76.67 Developing 0 100 18.59
HUMANITIES Problem Solving 60.42 Developing 0 100 18.28
PHILOSOPHY Critical Thinking 53.88 Emerging 0 100 19.43
PHILOSOPHY Information Literacy 48.33 Emerging 0 100 19.62
HUMANITIES Critical Thinking 44.87 Emerging 0 83.33 18.21
SCIENCE Critical Thinking 43.74 Emerging 0 80.95 14.54
HUMANITIES Information Literacy 43.03 Emerging 0 83.33 15.35
SCIENCE Problem Solving 42.12 Emerging 14.29 80.95 13.99
SCIENCE Information Literacy 39.53 Needs Support 0 77.78 15.29
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving
76.67
Strong
Competency: Developing
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 18.59
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving
60.42
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 18.28
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking
53.88
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 19.43
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy
48.33
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 19.62
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking
44.87
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 18.21
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
43.74
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 0
Max 80.95
Std Dev 14.54
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
43.03
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 15.35
SCIENCE
Problem Solving
42.12
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 14.29
Max 80.95
Std Dev 13.99
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
39.53
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 0
Max 77.78
Std Dev 15.29
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Rank School Name Examinees Avg MPS Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
1 STI College - Baguio 130 47.11% 3.1% (4) 58.5% (76) 37.7% (49) 0.8% (1) 0% (0)
School Proficiency Band Distribution
STI College - Baguio
130 examinees
47.11%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient 3.1% (4)
Low Proficient 58.5% (76)
Nearly Proficient 37.7% (49)
Proficient 0.8% (1)
Highly Proficient 0% (0)