NAT 2024 | Informatics Baguio City Center, Inc.
25
Total Examinees
37.38%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
3 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
19 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
3 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 25 | 47.25% | Low Proficient |
4% (1) |
56% (14) |
36% (9) |
4% (1) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 25 | 43.83% | Low Proficient |
12% (3) |
48% (12) |
36% (9) |
4% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 25 | 40.08% | Low Proficient |
16% (4) |
56% (14) |
28% (7) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 25 | 39.32% | Low Proficient |
12% (3) |
64% (16) |
24% (6) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 25 | 34.2% | Low Proficient |
4% (1) |
88% (22) |
8% (2) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 25 | 33.93% | Low Proficient |
16% (4) |
80% (20) |
4% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 25 | 32.59% | Low Proficient |
28% (7) |
60% (15) |
12% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 25 | 27.86% | Low Proficient |
28% (7) |
72% (18) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
25 examinees47.25%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4%
LoP: 56%
NeP: 36%
P: 4%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
25 examinees43.83%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 12%
LoP: 48%
NeP: 36%
P: 4%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
25 examinees40.08%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 16%
LoP: 56%
NeP: 28%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
25 examinees39.32%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 12%
LoP: 64%
NeP: 24%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
25 examinees34.2%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4%
LoP: 88%
NeP: 8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
25 examinees33.93%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 16%
LoP: 80%
NeP: 4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
25 examinees32.59%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 28%
LoP: 60%
NeP: 12%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
25 examinees27.86%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 28%
LoP: 72%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
53.55%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
50.74%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
44.89%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
40.44%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
39.78%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
39.59%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
37.33%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
35.56%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
35.56%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 68.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.3 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 68 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.46 |
| Understand The Problem | 54.67 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 24.73 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 53.33 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.66 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 48 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 20.18 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 44 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.4 |
| Evaluate Sources | 36 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.89 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 35.55 | Average Mastery | 0 | 88.89 | 20.61 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 34.67 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 18.21 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 57.33 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 38.32 |
| Understand The Problem | 50 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 44.72 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 43.33 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 26.25 |
| Evaluate Sources | 42.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.36 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 41.33 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.04 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 40.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 23.13 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 36 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 19.82 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 35.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 58.33 | 16.25 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 29.33 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 18.43 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 49.33 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.45 |
| Evaluate Sources | 40.67 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 21.64 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 38.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.97 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 36 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 16.79 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 35.11 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 77.78 | 18.24 |
| Understand The Problem | 30 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 17 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 28 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 18.69 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 27.33 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 16.92 |
| Execute Strategy | 26.22 | Low Mastery | 0 | 55.56 | 12.12 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance68.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.3
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance68
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.46
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance54.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
24.73
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance53.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.66
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance48
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.18
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.4
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance36
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.89
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance35.55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
20.61
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance34.67
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.21
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance57.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
38.32
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
44.72
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance43.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
26.25
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance42.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.36
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance41.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.04
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance40.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
23.13
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance36
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
19.82
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance35.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
58.33
Std Dev
16.25
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance29.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.43
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance49.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.45
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance40.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.64
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance38.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.97
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance36
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.79
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance35.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
77.78
Std Dev
18.24
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance30
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
17
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance28
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.69
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance27.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.92
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance26.22
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
55.56
Std Dev
12.12
21st Century Skills Performance Informatics Baguio City Center, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Informatics Baguio City Center, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects48.4
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects37.23
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects37
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 37.8% | 39.2% | 34.7% | 37.2% |
| Information Literacy | 35.3% | 41.7% | 34.0% | 37.0% |
| Problem Solving | 48.4% | 62.9% | 33.9% | 48.4% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 62.93 | Developing | 13.33 | 100 | 21.34 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 48.36 | Emerging | 0 | 90.91 | 28.02 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 41.67 | Emerging | 8.33 | 75 | 17.95 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 39.24 | Needs Support | 14.29 | 90.48 | 16.94 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 37.78 | Needs Support | 0 | 66.67 | 13.88 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 35.33 | Needs Support | 0 | 61.11 | 13.32 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 34.67 | Needs Support | 14.29 | 66.67 | 13.9 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 34 | Needs Support | 16.67 | 61.11 | 10.58 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 33.91 | Needs Support | 14.29 | 57.14 | 12.51 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving62.93
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
13.33
Max
100
Std Dev
21.34
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving48.36
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
90.91
Std Dev
28.02
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy41.67
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
8.33
Max
75
Std Dev
17.95
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking39.24
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
14.29
Max
90.48
Std Dev
16.94
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking37.78
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.88
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy35.33
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
61.11
Std Dev
13.32
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking34.67
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
14.29
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.9
SCIENCE
Information Literacy34
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
16.67
Max
61.11
Std Dev
10.58
SCIENCE
Problem Solving33.91
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
14.29
Max
57.14
Std Dev
12.51
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Informatics Baguio City Center, Inc. | 25 | 37.38% | 12% (3) | 76% (19) | 12% (3) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Informatics Baguio City Center, Inc.
25 examinees37.38%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
12% (3)
Low Proficient
76% (19)
Nearly Proficient
12% (3)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)