NAT 2024 | Data Center College of the Philippines of Baguio City, Inc.
323
Total Examinees
43%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
21 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
212 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
90 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 323 | 55.36% | Nearly Proficient |
3.7% (12) |
28.2% (91) |
54.8% (177) |
13% (42) |
0.3% (1) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 323 | 48.92% | Low Proficient |
8% (26) |
42.1% (136) |
36.5% (118) |
13.3% (43) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 323 | 44.69% | Low Proficient |
5.9% (19) |
53.9% (174) |
39.6% (128) |
0.6% (2) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 323 | 43.87% | Low Proficient |
7.1% (23) |
57.9% (187) |
35% (113) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 323 | 43.31% | Low Proficient |
11.1% (36) |
47.7% (154) |
40.2% (130) |
0.9% (3) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 323 | 37.31% | Low Proficient |
9% (29) |
75.9% (245) |
15.2% (49) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 323 | 37.16% | Low Proficient |
11.5% (37) |
74.9% (242) |
13.6% (44) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 323 | 33.39% | Low Proficient |
17.3% (56) |
74% (239) |
8.7% (28) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
323 examinees55.36%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.7%
LoP: 28.2%
NeP: 54.8%
P: 13%
HP: 0.3%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
323 examinees48.92%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 8%
LoP: 42.1%
NeP: 36.5%
P: 13.3%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
323 examinees44.69%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.9%
LoP: 53.9%
NeP: 39.6%
P: 0.6%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
323 examinees43.87%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.1%
LoP: 57.9%
NeP: 35%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
323 examinees43.31%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 11.1%
LoP: 47.7%
NeP: 40.2%
P: 0.9%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
323 examinees37.31%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 9%
LoP: 75.9%
NeP: 15.2%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
323 examinees37.16%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 11.5%
LoP: 74.9%
NeP: 13.6%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
323 examinees33.39%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 17.3%
LoP: 74%
NeP: 8.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
58.77%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
55.47%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
50.26%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
50.12%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
49.88%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
46.84%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
35.07%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
36.91%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
35.07%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 79.15 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.27 |
| Understand The Problem | 66.2 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.83 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 64.91 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.93 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 62.44 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.31 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 58.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.54 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 47.82 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.5 |
| Evaluate Sources | 46.13 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.22 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 43.65 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.08 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 35.5 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.44 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 71.72 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.18 |
| Evaluate Sources | 61.82 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.8 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 53.25 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.08 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 52.58 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.95 |
| Understand The Problem | 44.12 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.7 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 41.07 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.74 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 38.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.68 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 35.71 | Average Mastery | 0 | 91.67 | 17.81 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 25.7 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 18.18 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 48.92 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.69 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 46.13 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.78 |
| Evaluate Sources | 42.83 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.16 |
| Understand The Problem | 39.32 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.65 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 36.53 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.8 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 35.86 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.25 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 34.67 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.9 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 27.61 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.67 |
| Execute Strategy | 25.45 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 14.11 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance79.15
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.27
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance66.2
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.83
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance64.91
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.93
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance62.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.31
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance58.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.54
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance47.82
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.5
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance46.13
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.22
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance43.65
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.08
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance35.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.44
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance71.72
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.18
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance61.82
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.8
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance53.25
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.08
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance52.58
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.95
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance44.12
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.7
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance41.07
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.74
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance38.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.68
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance35.71
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
91.67
Std Dev
17.81
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance25.7
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.18
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance48.92
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.69
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance46.13
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.78
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance42.83
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.16
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance39.32
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.65
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance36.53
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.8
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance35.86
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.25
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance34.67
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.9
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance27.61
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.67
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance25.45
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14.11
21st Century Skills Performance Data Center College of the Philippines of Baguio City, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Data Center College of the Philippines of Baguio City, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects54.5
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects43.76
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects39.73
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 41.0% | 50.4% | 39.9% | 43.8% |
| Information Literacy | 39.2% | 44.3% | 35.7% | 39.7% |
| Problem Solving | 56.3% | 71.1% | 36.1% | 54.5% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 71.12 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 23.92 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 56.26 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 20.18 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 50.43 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 19.51 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 44.27 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 18.16 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 40.95 | Emerging | 0 | 88.89 | 17.5 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 39.89 | Needs Support | 0 | 80.95 | 15.62 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 39.22 | Needs Support | 0 | 83.33 | 15.09 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 36.12 | Needs Support | 0 | 85.71 | 14.63 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 35.69 | Needs Support | 0 | 72.22 | 14.74 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving71.12
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.92
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving56.26
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.18
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking50.43
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.51
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy44.27
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.16
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking40.95
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
17.5
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking39.89
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
15.62
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy39.22
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
15.09
SCIENCE
Problem Solving36.12
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
85.71
Std Dev
14.63
SCIENCE
Information Literacy35.69
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
72.22
Std Dev
14.74
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Data Center College of the Philippines of Baguio City, Inc. | 323 | 43% | 6.5% (21) | 65.6% (212) | 27.9% (90) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Data Center College of the Philippines of Baguio City, Inc.
323 examinees43%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
6.5% (21)
Low Proficient
65.6% (212)
Nearly Proficient
27.9% (90)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)