NAT 2024 | BSBT College, Inc.
56
Total Examinees
47.63%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
34 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
22 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 56 | 60.42% | Nearly Proficient |
1.8% (1) |
21.4% (12) |
58.9% (33) |
12.5% (7) |
5.4% (3) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 56 | 56.51% | Nearly Proficient |
1.8% (1) |
35.7% (20) |
44.6% (25) |
17.9% (10) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 56 | 50.6% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
50% (28) |
48.2% (27) |
1.8% (1) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 56 | 48.91% | Low Proficient |
3.6% (2) |
46.4% (26) |
50% (28) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 56 | 47.57% | Low Proficient |
1.8% (1) |
53.6% (30) |
42.9% (24) |
1.8% (1) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 56 | 40.77% | Low Proficient |
7.1% (4) |
69.6% (39) |
23.2% (13) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 56 | 40.61% | Low Proficient |
7.1% (4) |
76.8% (43) |
16.1% (9) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 56 | 35.62% | Low Proficient |
8.9% (5) |
85.7% (48) |
5.4% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
56 examinees60.42%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.8%
LoP: 21.4%
NeP: 58.9%
P: 12.5%
HP: 5.4%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
56 examinees56.51%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.8%
LoP: 35.7%
NeP: 44.6%
P: 17.9%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
56 examinees50.6%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 50%
NeP: 48.2%
P: 1.8%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
56 examinees48.91%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.6%
LoP: 46.4%
NeP: 50%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
56 examinees47.57%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.8%
LoP: 53.6%
NeP: 42.9%
P: 1.8%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
56 examinees40.77%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.1%
LoP: 69.6%
NeP: 23.2%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
56 examinees40.61%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.1%
LoP: 76.8%
NeP: 16.1%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
56 examinees35.62%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 8.9%
LoP: 85.7%
NeP: 5.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
66.04%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
63%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
58.14%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
53.18%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
52.22%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
50.8%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
35.22%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
40.87%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
35.22%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 86.61 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 50 | 100 | 15.88 |
| Understand The Problem | 77.68 | Moving Towards Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 19.49 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 72.62 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.66 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 65.77 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 20.75 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 63.69 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.39 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 52.98 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.79 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 50 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.02 |
| Evaluate Sources | 47.92 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.18 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 35.71 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.37 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 82.74 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 21.81 |
| Evaluate Sources | 61.91 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.39 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 58.93 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 18.08 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 56.25 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 20.06 |
| Understand The Problem | 50 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 37.8 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 45.24 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.59 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 39.29 | Average Mastery | 0 | 91.67 | 18.94 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 37.2 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.13 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 30.06 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.23 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 60.12 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 23.71 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 51.59 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 88.89 | 19.86 |
| Understand The Problem | 46.73 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.01 |
| Evaluate Sources | 42.56 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.4 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 39.58 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.05 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 36.91 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.21 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 32.74 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 16.95 |
| Execute Strategy | 28.77 | Low Mastery | 0 | 77.78 | 14.51 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 28.57 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.82 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance86.61
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
15.88
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance77.68
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
19.49
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance72.62
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.66
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance65.77
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
20.75
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance63.69
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.39
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance52.98
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.79
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.02
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance47.92
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.18
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance35.71
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.37
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance82.74
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
21.81
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance61.91
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.39
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance58.93
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
18.08
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance56.25
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
20.06
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
37.8
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance45.24
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.59
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance39.29
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
91.67
Std Dev
18.94
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance37.2
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.13
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance30.06
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.23
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance60.12
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
23.71
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance51.59
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
88.89
Std Dev
19.86
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance46.73
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.01
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance42.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.4
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance39.58
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.05
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance36.91
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.21
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance32.74
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.95
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance28.77
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
77.78
Std Dev
14.51
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance28.57
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.82
21st Century Skills Performance BSBT College, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
BSBT College, Inc.
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects61.81
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects46.8
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects41.83
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 44.1% | 53.9% | 42.4% | 46.8% |
| Information Literacy | 42.1% | 47.0% | 36.4% | 41.8% |
| Problem Solving | 62.3% | 80.2% | 42.9% | 61.8% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 80.24 | Competent | 40 | 100 | 14.69 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 62.34 | Developing | 27.27 | 100 | 17.73 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 53.91 | Emerging | 9.52 | 100 | 19.98 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 47.02 | Emerging | 8.33 | 100 | 20.44 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 44.05 | Emerging | 5.56 | 88.89 | 18.09 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 42.86 | Emerging | 14.29 | 66.67 | 12.6 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 42.43 | Emerging | 19.05 | 76.19 | 13.6 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 42.06 | Emerging | 16.67 | 83.33 | 13.68 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 36.41 | Needs Support | 5.56 | 83.33 | 15.53 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving80.24
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
40
Max
100
Std Dev
14.69
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving62.34
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
27.27
Max
100
Std Dev
17.73
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking53.91
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
9.52
Max
100
Std Dev
19.98
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy47.02
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
8.33
Max
100
Std Dev
20.44
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking44.05
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
5.56
Max
88.89
Std Dev
18.09
SCIENCE
Problem Solving42.86
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
14.29
Max
66.67
Std Dev
12.6
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking42.43
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
19.05
Max
76.19
Std Dev
13.6
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy42.06
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
13.68
SCIENCE
Information Literacy36.41
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
5.56
Max
83.33
Std Dev
15.53
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BSBT College, Inc. | 56 | 47.63% | 0% (0) | 60.7% (34) | 39.3% (22) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
BSBT College, Inc.
56 examinees47.63%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
60.7% (34)
Nearly Proficient
39.3% (22)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)