NAT 2024 | Baguio College of Technology
302
Total Examinees
42.44%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
7 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
219 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
76 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 302 | 53.28% | Nearly Proficient |
3.6% (11) |
36.1% (109) |
48.7% (147) |
11.6% (35) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 302 | 46.72% | Low Proficient |
9.9% (30) |
44% (133) |
38.4% (116) |
7.3% (22) |
0.3% (1) |
| HUMANITIES | 302 | 44.97% | Low Proficient |
3% (9) |
61.3% (185) |
35.4% (107) |
0.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 302 | 44.55% | Low Proficient |
5.3% (16) |
53.6% (162) |
39.1% (118) |
2% (6) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 302 | 42.11% | Low Proficient |
10.6% (32) |
57.3% (173) |
31.8% (96) |
0.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 302 | 37.59% | Low Proficient |
7.6% (23) |
76.2% (230) |
16.2% (49) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 302 | 36.12% | Low Proficient |
15.2% (46) |
74.2% (224) |
10.6% (32) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 302 | 34.15% | Low Proficient |
15.2% (46) |
76.2% (230) |
8.6% (26) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
302 examinees53.28%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.6%
LoP: 36.1%
NeP: 48.7%
P: 11.6%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
302 examinees46.72%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 9.9%
LoP: 44%
NeP: 38.4%
P: 7.3%
HP: 0.3%
HUMANITIES
302 examinees44.97%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3%
LoP: 61.3%
NeP: 35.4%
P: 0.3%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
302 examinees44.55%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.3%
LoP: 53.6%
NeP: 39.1%
P: 2%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
302 examinees42.11%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 10.6%
LoP: 57.3%
NeP: 31.8%
P: 0.3%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
302 examinees37.59%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.6%
LoP: 76.2%
NeP: 16.2%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
302 examinees36.12%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 15.2%
LoP: 74.2%
NeP: 10.6%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
302 examinees34.15%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 15.2%
LoP: 76.2%
NeP: 8.6%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
58.28%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
57.67%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
51.77%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
48.05%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
47.02%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
45.65%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
38.04%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
37.27%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
37.27%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 75.77 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.63 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 68.1 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.6 |
| Understand The Problem | 66.45 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.99 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 58.72 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.76 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 56.02 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.97 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 46.91 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.22 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 44.26 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.15 |
| Evaluate Sources | 41.94 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.32 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 32.84 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.46 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 72.3 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.48 |
| Evaluate Sources | 57.17 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.71 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 54.3 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.95 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 51.6 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.35 |
| Understand The Problem | 47.52 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 36.65 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 43.27 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.12 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 37.97 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.53 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 36.92 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 16.85 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 29.69 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.83 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 50.61 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.5 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 44 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.31 |
| Evaluate Sources | 41.94 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.24 |
| Understand The Problem | 41.34 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.4 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 38.02 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.41 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 35.21 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.08 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 33.83 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.32 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 28.75 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 18.75 |
| Execute Strategy | 26.78 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 14.54 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance75.77
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.63
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance68.1
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.6
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance66.45
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.99
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance58.72
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.76
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance56.02
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.97
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance46.91
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.22
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance44.26
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.15
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance41.94
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.32
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance32.84
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.46
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance72.3
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.48
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance57.17
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.71
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance54.3
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.95
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance51.6
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.35
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance47.52
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
36.65
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance43.27
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.12
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance37.97
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.53
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance36.92
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.85
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance29.69
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.83
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance50.61
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.5
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.31
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance41.94
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.24
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance41.34
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.4
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance38.02
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.41
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance35.21
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.08
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance33.83
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.32
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance28.75
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.75
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance26.78
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14.54
21st Century Skills Performance Baguio College of Technology
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Baguio College of Technology
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects55.41
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects42.16
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects40.01
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 40.5% | 47.0% | 39.1% | 42.2% |
| Information Literacy | 41.5% | 42.8% | 35.7% | 40.0% |
| Problem Solving | 58.0% | 70.5% | 37.8% | 55.4% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 70.51 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 23.52 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 57.98 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 18.94 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 46.96 | Emerging | 0 | 95.24 | 19.29 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 42.83 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 17.69 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 41.52 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 14.48 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 40.47 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 16.74 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 39.06 | Needs Support | 0 | 80.95 | 14.94 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 37.75 | Needs Support | 0 | 80.95 | 13.82 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 35.69 | Needs Support | 0 | 72.22 | 14 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving70.51
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.52
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving57.98
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.94
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking46.96
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
95.24
Std Dev
19.29
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy42.83
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.69
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy41.52
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
14.48
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking40.47
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.74
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking39.06
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
14.94
SCIENCE
Problem Solving37.75
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
13.82
SCIENCE
Information Literacy35.69
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
72.22
Std Dev
14
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baguio College of Technology | 302 | 42.44% | 2.3% (7) | 72.5% (219) | 25.2% (76) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Baguio College of Technology
302 examinees42.44%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
2.3% (7)
Low Proficient
72.5% (219)
Nearly Proficient
25.2% (76)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)