NAT 2024 | AMA Computer College-Baguio City
105
Total Examinees
44.45%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
76 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
28 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 105 | 57.46% | Nearly Proficient |
1% (1) |
27.6% (29) |
59% (62) |
11.4% (12) |
1% (1) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 105 | 51.09% | Nearly Proficient |
8.6% (9) |
37.1% (39) |
41.9% (44) |
12.4% (13) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 105 | 46.67% | Low Proficient |
1% (1) |
52.4% (55) |
46.7% (49) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 105 | 43.69% | Low Proficient |
10.5% (11) |
52.4% (55) |
37.1% (39) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 105 | 43.46% | Low Proficient |
4.8% (5) |
63.8% (67) |
31.4% (33) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 105 | 40% | Low Proficient |
3.8% (4) |
78.1% (82) |
18.1% (19) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 105 | 38.62% | Low Proficient |
5.7% (6) |
77.1% (81) |
16.2% (17) |
1% (1) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 105 | 34.58% | Low Proficient |
14.3% (15) |
77.1% (81) |
8.6% (9) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
105 examinees57.46%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1%
LoP: 27.6%
NeP: 59%
P: 11.4%
HP: 1%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
105 examinees51.09%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 8.6%
LoP: 37.1%
NeP: 41.9%
P: 12.4%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
105 examinees46.67%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1%
LoP: 52.4%
NeP: 46.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
105 examinees43.69%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 10.5%
LoP: 52.4%
NeP: 37.1%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
105 examinees43.46%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4.8%
LoP: 63.8%
NeP: 31.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
105 examinees40%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.8%
LoP: 78.1%
NeP: 18.1%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
105 examinees38.62%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.7%
LoP: 77.1%
NeP: 16.2%
P: 1%
HP: 0%
MATH
105 examinees34.58%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 14.3%
LoP: 77.1%
NeP: 8.6%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
59.98%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
57.67%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
53.97%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
53.6%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
51.01%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
47.61%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
36.4%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
36.51%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
36.4%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 80.79 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.39 |
| Understand The Problem | 72.06 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.83 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 67.3 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.45 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 67.3 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.34 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 60 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.87 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 49.21 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.85 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 47.2 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.73 |
| Evaluate Sources | 44.13 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.9 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 40 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.89 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 71.75 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.74 |
| Evaluate Sources | 60.64 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.46 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 56.35 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 18.88 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 53.02 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.22 |
| Understand The Problem | 49.52 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 36.84 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 39.68 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.13 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 35.64 | Average Mastery | 0 | 75 | 18.38 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 34.76 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 18.84 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 22.54 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 17.21 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 52.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.14 |
| Evaluate Sources | 48.25 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.78 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 47.2 | Average Mastery | 0 | 88.89 | 20.22 |
| Understand The Problem | 40.32 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.3 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 37.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 23.49 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 37.14 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.48 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 34.44 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.42 |
| Execute Strategy | 27.41 | Low Mastery | 0 | 55.56 | 13.37 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 23.65 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 18.66 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance80.79
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.39
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance72.06
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.83
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance67.3
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.45
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance67.3
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.34
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance60
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.87
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance49.21
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.85
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance47.2
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.73
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance44.13
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.9
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance40
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.89
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance71.75
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.74
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance60.64
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.46
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance56.35
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.88
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance53.02
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.22
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance49.52
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
36.84
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance39.68
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.13
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance35.64
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
75
Std Dev
18.38
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance34.76
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.84
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance22.54
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.21
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance52.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.14
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance48.25
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.78
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance47.2
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
20.22
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance40.32
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.3
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance37.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
23.49
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance37.14
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.48
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance34.44
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.42
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance27.41
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
55.56
Std Dev
13.37
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance23.65
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.66
21st Century Skills Performance AMA Computer College-Baguio City
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
AMA Computer College-Baguio City
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects56.8
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects43.74
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects41.15
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 40.5% | 50.0% | 40.8% | 43.7% |
| Information Literacy | 37.9% | 49.1% | 36.5% | 41.2% |
| Problem Solving | 57.5% | 74.6% | 38.3% | 56.8% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 74.6 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 19.13 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 57.49 | Emerging | 0 | 90.91 | 17.14 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 49.98 | Emerging | 0 | 80.95 | 16.85 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 49.13 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 16.58 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 40.77 | Emerging | 0 | 80.95 | 13.69 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 40.48 | Emerging | 0 | 77.78 | 17.02 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 38.32 | Needs Support | 0 | 76.19 | 13.93 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 37.88 | Needs Support | 0 | 66.67 | 12.62 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 36.45 | Needs Support | 0 | 72.22 | 14.4 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving74.6
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.13
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving57.49
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
90.91
Std Dev
17.14
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking49.98
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
16.85
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy49.13
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
16.58
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking40.77
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
13.69
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking40.48
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
77.78
Std Dev
17.02
SCIENCE
Problem Solving38.32
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
76.19
Std Dev
13.93
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy37.88
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
12.62
SCIENCE
Information Literacy36.45
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
72.22
Std Dev
14.4
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMA Computer College-Baguio City | 105 | 44.45% | 1% (1) | 72.4% (76) | 26.7% (28) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
AMA Computer College-Baguio City
105 examinees44.45%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
1% (1)
Low Proficient
72.4% (76)
Nearly Proficient
26.7% (28)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)