NAT 2024 | Baguio City National Science High School
495
Total Examinees
55.43%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
5.1%
Proficient & Above
(25 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
5 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
159 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
306 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
25 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 495 | 69.92% | Nearly Proficient |
1.2% (6) |
9.7% (48) |
45.1% (223) |
34.3% (170) |
9.7% (48) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 495 | 65.76% | Nearly Proficient |
1.2% (6) |
20.4% (101) |
37.8% (187) |
37.6% (186) |
3% (15) |
| LITERACY | 495 | 56.01% | Nearly Proficient |
1.6% (8) |
27.7% (137) |
61.6% (305) |
9.1% (45) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 495 | 55.59% | Nearly Proficient |
0.8% (4) |
32.1% (159) |
62.2% (308) |
4.8% (24) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 495 | 54.94% | Nearly Proficient |
4% (20) |
24.8% (123) |
66.9% (331) |
4.2% (21) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 495 | 48.91% | Low Proficient |
3.2% (16) |
50.9% (252) |
42.4% (210) |
3.4% (17) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 495 | 47.18% | Low Proficient |
3.6% (18) |
50.9% (252) |
45.5% (225) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 495 | 45.12% | Low Proficient |
6.1% (30) |
58.8% (291) |
30.1% (149) |
4.8% (24) |
0.2% (1) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
495 examinees69.92%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.2%
LoP: 9.7%
NeP: 45.1%
P: 34.3%
HP: 9.7%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
495 examinees65.76%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.2%
LoP: 20.4%
NeP: 37.8%
P: 37.6%
HP: 3%
LITERACY
495 examinees56.01%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.6%
LoP: 27.7%
NeP: 61.6%
P: 9.1%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
495 examinees55.59%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0.8%
LoP: 32.1%
NeP: 62.2%
P: 4.8%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
495 examinees54.94%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4%
LoP: 24.8%
NeP: 66.9%
P: 4.2%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
495 examinees48.91%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.2%
LoP: 50.9%
NeP: 42.4%
P: 3.4%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
495 examinees47.18%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.6%
LoP: 50.9%
NeP: 45.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
495 examinees45.12%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.1%
LoP: 58.8%
NeP: 30.1%
P: 4.8%
HP: 0.2%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
69.9%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
68.93%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
65.68%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
65.07%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
61.14%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
58.65%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
48.16%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
48.87%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
48.16%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 89.97 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 0 | 100 | 17.67 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 81.48 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.22 |
| Understand The Problem | 81.04 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.12 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 72.93 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.36 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 71.82 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.02 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 65.12 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.78 |
| Evaluate Sources | 63 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.24 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 56.63 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.49 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 50.37 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.57 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 84.11 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.6 |
| Evaluate Sources | 76.57 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.1 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 64.51 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.78 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 63.6 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.87 |
| Understand The Problem | 58.99 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 35.89 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 54.14 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.03 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 50.4 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.97 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 46.87 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 16.87 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 36.16 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.1 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 63.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.69 |
| Evaluate Sources | 57.47 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.34 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 57.26 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.28 |
| Understand The Problem | 55.19 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.14 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 51.68 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.21 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 46.9 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.63 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 45.83 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.05 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.97 |
| Execute Strategy | 32.7 | Low Mastery | 0 | 77.78 | 14.92 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance89.97
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.67
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance81.48
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.22
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance81.04
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.12
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance72.93
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.36
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance71.82
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.02
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance65.12
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.78
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance63
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.24
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance56.63
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.49
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance50.37
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.57
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance84.11
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.6
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance76.57
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.1
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance64.51
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.78
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance63.6
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.87
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance58.99
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
35.89
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance54.14
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.03
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance50.4
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.97
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance46.87
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.87
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance36.16
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.1
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance63.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.69
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance57.47
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.34
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance57.26
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.28
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance55.19
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.14
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance51.68
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.21
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance46.9
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.63
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance45.83
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.05
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.97
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance32.7
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
77.78
Std Dev
14.92
21st Century Skills Performance Baguio City National Science High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Baguio City National Science High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects67.18
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects56.65
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects51.93
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 53.0% | 66.4% | 50.5% | 56.7% |
| Information Literacy | 50.1% | 57.6% | 48.1% | 51.9% |
| Problem Solving | 68.9% | 84.7% | 48.0% | 67.2% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 84.7 | Competent | 0 | 100 | 16.9 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 68.85 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 17.83 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 66.43 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 20.31 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 57.58 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 20.15 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 53.03 | Emerging | 0 | 88.89 | 16.79 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 50.49 | Emerging | 0 | 90.48 | 16.22 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 50.06 | Emerging | 0 | 77.78 | 14.45 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 48.14 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 18.67 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 47.98 | Emerging | 0 | 80.95 | 15.52 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving84.7
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
16.9
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving68.85
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.83
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking66.43
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.31
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy57.58
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.15
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking53.03
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
16.79
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking50.49
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
90.48
Std Dev
16.22
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy50.06
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
77.78
Std Dev
14.45
SCIENCE
Information Literacy48.14
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.67
SCIENCE
Problem Solving47.98
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
15.52
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baguio City National Science High School | 495 | 55.43% | 1% (5) | 32.1% (159) | 61.8% (306) | 5.1% (25) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Baguio City National Science High School
495 examinees55.43%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
1% (5)
Low Proficient
32.1% (159)
Nearly Proficient
61.8% (306)
Proficient
5.1% (25)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)