NAT 2024 | Pinget National High School
29
Total Examinees
49.52%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
16 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
13 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 29 | 62.5% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
24.1% (7) |
48.3% (14) |
24.1% (7) |
3.4% (1) |
| LITERACY | 29 | 56.39% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
31% (9) |
69% (20) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 29 | 53.04% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
37.9% (11) |
62.1% (18) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 29 | 48.85% | Low Proficient |
3.4% (1) |
51.7% (15) |
31% (9) |
13.8% (4) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 29 | 46.55% | Low Proficient |
6.9% (2) |
41.4% (12) |
51.7% (15) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 29 | 46.42% | Low Proficient |
3.4% (1) |
58.6% (17) |
34.5% (10) |
3.4% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 29 | 45.47% | Low Proficient |
6.9% (2) |
51.7% (15) |
41.4% (12) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 29 | 36.94% | Low Proficient |
6.9% (2) |
82.8% (24) |
10.3% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
29 examinees62.5%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 24.1%
NeP: 48.3%
P: 24.1%
HP: 3.4%
LITERACY
29 examinees56.39%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 31%
NeP: 69%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
29 examinees53.04%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 37.9%
NeP: 62.1%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
29 examinees48.85%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.4%
LoP: 51.7%
NeP: 31%
P: 13.8%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
29 examinees46.55%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.9%
LoP: 41.4%
NeP: 51.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
29 examinees46.42%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.4%
LoP: 58.6%
NeP: 34.5%
P: 3.4%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
29 examinees45.47%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.9%
LoP: 51.7%
NeP: 41.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
29 examinees36.94%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.9%
LoP: 82.8%
NeP: 10.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
69.48%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
68.2%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
57.66%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
57.03%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
55.36%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
50.38%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
49.81%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
36.4%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
36.4%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 89.66 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.78 |
| Evaluate Sources | 65.52 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.66 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 60.92 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 22 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 59.77 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 20.77 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 50.57 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 24.94 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 48.85 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 75 | 19.42 |
| Understand The Problem | 44.83 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.36 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 42.53 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.6 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 32.76 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 17.77 |
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 87.36 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 17.32 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 77.01 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 26.41 |
| Understand The Problem | 73.56 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.67 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 68.97 | Moving Towards Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 24.65 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 55.56 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 100 | 20.84 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 55.17 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 32.78 |
| Evaluate Sources | 54.02 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.83 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 48.28 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.27 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 29.88 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.98 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 29.03 |
| Evaluate Sources | 53.45 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.05 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 53.26 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 100 | 22.86 |
| Understand The Problem | 47.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.44 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 46.55 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.48 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 45.4 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 23.12 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 41.38 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.82 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 37.36 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.37 |
| Execute Strategy | 31.41 | Low Mastery | 0 | 44.44 | 15.18 |
Domain Performance
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance89.66
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.78
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance65.52
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.66
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance60.92
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance59.77
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.77
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance50.57
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
24.94
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance48.85
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
75
Std Dev
19.42
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance44.83
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.36
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance42.53
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.6
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance32.76
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
17.77
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance87.36
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
17.32
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance77.01
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
26.41
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance73.56
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.67
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance68.97
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
24.65
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
100
Std Dev
20.84
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance55.17
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
32.78
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance54.02
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.83
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance48.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.27
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance29.88
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.98
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
29.03
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance53.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.05
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance53.26
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
100
Std Dev
22.86
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance47.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.44
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance46.55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.48
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance45.4
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
23.12
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance41.38
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.82
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance37.36
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.37
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance31.41
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
44.44
Std Dev
15.18
21st Century Skills Performance Pinget National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Pinget National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects63.91
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects52.77
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects46.43
Needs Support
Subjects:
HUMANITIES
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 50.6% | 59.0% | 48.8% | 52.8% |
| Information Literacy | 47.7% | 47.1% | 44.5% | 46.4% |
| Problem Solving | 65.8% | 79.8% | 46.1% | 63.9% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 79.77 | Developing | 46.67 | 100 | 15.21 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 65.83 | Developing | 27.27 | 90.91 | 15.22 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 58.95 | Emerging | 19.05 | 95.24 | 16.98 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 50.58 | Emerging | 22.22 | 77.78 | 15.87 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 48.77 | Emerging | 9.52 | 80.95 | 16.99 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 47.7 | Emerging | 22.22 | 72.22 | 13.41 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 47.13 | Emerging | 16.67 | 91.67 | 17.27 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 46.14 | Emerging | 9.52 | 66.67 | 15.97 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 44.45 | Emerging | 16.67 | 77.78 | 17.63 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving79.77
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
46.67
Max
100
Std Dev
15.21
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving65.83
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
27.27
Max
90.91
Std Dev
15.22
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking58.95
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
19.05
Max
95.24
Std Dev
16.98
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking50.58
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
22.22
Max
77.78
Std Dev
15.87
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking48.77
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
9.52
Max
80.95
Std Dev
16.99
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy47.7
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
22.22
Max
72.22
Std Dev
13.41
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy47.13
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
91.67
Std Dev
17.27
SCIENCE
Problem Solving46.14
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
9.52
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.97
SCIENCE
Information Literacy44.45
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
77.78
Std Dev
17.63
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pinget National High School | 29 | 49.52% | 0% (0) | 55.2% (16) | 44.8% (13) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Pinget National High School
29 examinees49.52%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
55.2% (16)
Nearly Proficient
44.8% (13)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)