NAT 2024 | Guisad Valley National High School
376
Total Examinees
47.9%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
6 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
206 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
164 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 376 | 61.28% | Nearly Proficient |
1.9% (7) |
19.9% (75) |
56.4% (212) |
20.2% (76) |
1.6% (6) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 376 | 56.17% | Nearly Proficient |
2.1% (8) |
31.4% (118) |
48.1% (181) |
17.6% (66) |
0.8% (3) |
| LITERACY | 376 | 49.36% | Low Proficient |
2.9% (11) |
44.4% (167) |
51.1% (192) |
1.6% (6) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 376 | 48.97% | Low Proficient |
3.5% (13) |
42.8% (161) |
52.4% (197) |
1.3% (5) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 376 | 47.22% | Low Proficient |
2.7% (10) |
55.3% (208) |
41% (154) |
1.1% (4) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 376 | 41.54% | Low Proficient |
6.1% (23) |
67.3% (253) |
26.3% (99) |
0.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 376 | 41.28% | Low Proficient |
5.6% (21) |
71.8% (270) |
22.6% (85) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 376 | 37.4% | Low Proficient |
9% (34) |
79.5% (299) |
11.4% (43) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
376 examinees61.28%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.9%
LoP: 19.9%
NeP: 56.4%
P: 20.2%
HP: 1.6%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
376 examinees56.17%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.1%
LoP: 31.4%
NeP: 48.1%
P: 17.6%
HP: 0.8%
LITERACY
376 examinees49.36%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.9%
LoP: 44.4%
NeP: 51.1%
P: 1.6%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
376 examinees48.97%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.5%
LoP: 42.8%
NeP: 52.4%
P: 1.3%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
376 examinees47.22%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.7%
LoP: 55.3%
NeP: 41%
P: 1.1%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
376 examinees41.54%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.1%
LoP: 67.3%
NeP: 26.3%
P: 0.3%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
376 examinees41.28%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.6%
LoP: 71.8%
NeP: 22.6%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
376 examinees37.4%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 9%
LoP: 79.5%
NeP: 11.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
63.91%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
61.83%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
55.92%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
55.12%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
52.59%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
51.57%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
39.55%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
40.45%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
39.55%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 85.95 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.78 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 73.85 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.64 |
| Understand The Problem | 73.09 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.02 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 64.14 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.27 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 64.01 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.26 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 53.49 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.47 |
| Evaluate Sources | 52.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.27 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 49.11 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.86 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 40.6 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.75 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 78.64 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.94 |
| Evaluate Sources | 64.18 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.25 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 55.05 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.51 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 53.86 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.54 |
| Understand The Problem | 47.07 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.89 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 43.22 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.28 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 42.11 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.83 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 40.51 | Average Mastery | 0 | 91.67 | 17.61 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 28.55 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 18.45 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 56.6 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.34 |
| Evaluate Sources | 50.89 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.85 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 50.06 | Average Mastery | 0 | 88.89 | 19.59 |
| Understand The Problem | 45.21 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.1 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 41 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.93 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 39.89 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.12 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 37.54 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.26 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 28.5 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.55 |
| Execute Strategy | 27.13 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 14 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance85.95
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.78
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance73.85
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.64
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance73.09
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.02
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance64.14
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.27
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance64.01
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.26
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance53.49
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.47
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance52.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.27
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance49.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.86
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance40.6
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.75
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance78.64
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.94
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance64.18
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.25
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance55.05
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.51
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance53.86
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.54
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance47.07
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.89
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance43.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.28
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance42.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.83
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance40.51
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
91.67
Std Dev
17.61
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance28.55
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.45
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance56.6
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.34
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance50.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.85
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance50.06
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
19.59
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance45.21
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.1
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance41
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.93
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance39.89
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.12
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance37.54
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.26
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance28.5
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.55
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance27.13
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14
21st Century Skills Performance Guisad Valley National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Guisad Valley National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects59.72
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects48.39
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects43.31
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 44.7% | 56.3% | 44.1% | 48.4% |
| Information Literacy | 41.9% | 48.6% | 39.5% | 43.3% |
| Problem Solving | 60.0% | 78.4% | 40.7% | 59.7% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 78.39 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 18.54 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 60.04 | Developing | 0 | 100 | 16.72 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 56.31 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 18.37 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 48.58 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 18.28 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 44.73 | Emerging | 0 | 88.89 | 17.22 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 44.14 | Emerging | 0 | 85.71 | 14.84 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 41.87 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 13.18 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 40.72 | Emerging | 0 | 80.95 | 13.9 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 39.48 | Needs Support | 0 | 94.44 | 16.07 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving78.39
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.54
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving60.04
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
16.72
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking56.31
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.37
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy48.58
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.28
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking44.73
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
17.22
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking44.14
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
85.71
Std Dev
14.84
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy41.87
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
13.18
SCIENCE
Problem Solving40.72
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
13.9
SCIENCE
Information Literacy39.48
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
94.44
Std Dev
16.07
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guisad Valley National High School | 376 | 47.9% | 1.6% (6) | 54.8% (206) | 43.6% (164) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Guisad Valley National High School
376 examinees47.9%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
1.6% (6)
Low Proficient
54.8% (206)
Nearly Proficient
43.6% (164)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)