NAT 2024 | Pines City National High School
185
Total Examinees
47.04%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
108 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
76 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 185 | 59.38% | Nearly Proficient |
1.1% (2) |
30.8% (57) |
42.7% (79) |
23.8% (44) |
1.6% (3) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 185 | 54.29% | Nearly Proficient |
2.2% (4) |
40% (74) |
36.8% (68) |
21.1% (39) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 185 | 49.15% | Low Proficient |
3.8% (7) |
45.9% (85) |
49.2% (91) |
1.1% (2) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 185 | 48.63% | Low Proficient |
3.8% (7) |
45.9% (85) |
48.1% (89) |
2.2% (4) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 185 | 47.57% | Low Proficient |
4.3% (8) |
52.4% (97) |
42.2% (78) |
1.1% (2) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 185 | 40.17% | Low Proficient |
5.4% (10) |
74.6% (138) |
20% (37) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 185 | 39.92% | Low Proficient |
8.1% (15) |
71.4% (132) |
20.5% (38) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 185 | 37.21% | Low Proficient |
14.6% (27) |
71.4% (132) |
13% (24) |
1.1% (2) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
185 examinees59.38%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.1%
LoP: 30.8%
NeP: 42.7%
P: 23.8%
HP: 1.6%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
185 examinees54.29%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.2%
LoP: 40%
NeP: 36.8%
P: 21.1%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
185 examinees49.15%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.8%
LoP: 45.9%
NeP: 49.2%
P: 1.1%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
185 examinees48.63%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.8%
LoP: 45.9%
NeP: 48.1%
P: 2.2%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
185 examinees47.57%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4.3%
LoP: 52.4%
NeP: 42.2%
P: 1.1%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
185 examinees40.17%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.4%
LoP: 74.6%
NeP: 20%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
185 examinees39.92%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 8.1%
LoP: 71.4%
NeP: 20.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
185 examinees37.21%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 14.6%
LoP: 71.4%
NeP: 13%
P: 1.1%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
61.55%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
59.7%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
58.02%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
55.71%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
54.06%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
47.96%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
39.58%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
40.03%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
39.58%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 80.45 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.89 |
| Understand The Problem | 73.87 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.06 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 70.09 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.1 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 65.59 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.92 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 61.26 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.46 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 52.31 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.4 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 49.55 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.64 |
| Evaluate Sources | 49.19 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.77 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 39.19 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.51 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 77.84 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.53 |
| Evaluate Sources | 66.49 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.48 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 58.2 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.06 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 56.31 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 19.59 |
| Understand The Problem | 53.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 35.06 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 43.87 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.76 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 42.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.08 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 36.08 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 17.4 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 30.63 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 18.3 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 52.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.3 |
| Evaluate Sources | 51.44 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.84 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 46.55 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.44 |
| Understand The Problem | 46.4 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.19 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 38.56 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.98 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 38.38 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.6 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 37.03 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 18.9 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 27.84 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.17 |
| Execute Strategy | 26.36 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 14.04 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance80.45
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.89
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance73.87
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.06
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance70.09
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.1
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance65.59
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.92
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance61.26
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.46
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance52.31
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.4
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance49.55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.64
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance49.19
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.77
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance39.19
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.51
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance77.84
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.53
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance66.49
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.48
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance58.2
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.06
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance56.31
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
19.59
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance53.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
35.06
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance43.87
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.76
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance42.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.08
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance36.08
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.4
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance30.63
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.3
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance52.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.3
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance51.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.84
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance46.55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.44
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance46.4
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.19
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance38.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.98
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance38.38
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.6
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance37.03
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.9
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance27.84
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.17
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance26.36
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14.04
21st Century Skills Performance Pines City National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Pines City National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects59.03
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects46.28
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects43.53
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 42.3% | 54.0% | 42.6% | 46.3% |
| Information Literacy | 44.2% | 48.4% | 38.0% | 43.5% |
| Problem Solving | 61.7% | 75.8% | 39.6% | 59.0% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 75.75 | Developing | 6.67 | 100 | 21.31 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 61.72 | Developing | 18.18 | 90.91 | 16.49 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 53.98 | Emerging | 9.52 | 100 | 20.02 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 48.38 | Emerging | 16.67 | 100 | 18.95 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 44.23 | Emerging | 11.11 | 94.44 | 14.99 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 42.6 | Emerging | 4.76 | 85.71 | 15.67 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 42.25 | Emerging | 5.56 | 88.89 | 17.68 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 39.61 | Needs Support | 4.76 | 71.43 | 12.6 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 37.99 | Needs Support | 5.56 | 77.78 | 14.38 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving75.75
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
6.67
Max
100
Std Dev
21.31
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving61.72
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
18.18
Max
90.91
Std Dev
16.49
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking53.98
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
9.52
Max
100
Std Dev
20.02
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy48.38
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
18.95
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy44.23
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
11.11
Max
94.44
Std Dev
14.99
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking42.6
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
4.76
Max
85.71
Std Dev
15.67
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking42.25
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
5.56
Max
88.89
Std Dev
17.68
SCIENCE
Problem Solving39.61
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
4.76
Max
71.43
Std Dev
12.6
SCIENCE
Information Literacy37.99
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
5.56
Max
77.78
Std Dev
14.38
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pines City National High School | 185 | 47.04% | 0.5% (1) | 58.4% (108) | 41.1% (76) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Pines City National High School
185 examinees47.04%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0.5% (1)
Low Proficient
58.4% (108)
Nearly Proficient
41.1% (76)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)