NAT 2024 | Irisan National High School
87
Total Examinees
49.97%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
41 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
45 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 87 | 64.87% | Nearly Proficient |
2.3% (2) |
12.6% (11) |
56.3% (49) |
25.3% (22) |
3.4% (3) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 87 | 59.91% | Nearly Proficient |
1.1% (1) |
23% (20) |
57.5% (50) |
14.9% (13) |
3.4% (3) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 87 | 52.19% | Nearly Proficient |
3.4% (3) |
32.2% (28) |
62.1% (54) |
2.3% (2) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 87 | 51.28% | Nearly Proficient |
1.1% (1) |
44.8% (39) |
50.6% (44) |
3.4% (3) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 87 | 50.69% | Nearly Proficient |
3.4% (3) |
36.8% (32) |
57.5% (50) |
2.3% (2) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 87 | 41.34% | Low Proficient |
3.4% (3) |
74.7% (65) |
21.8% (19) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 87 | 41.19% | Low Proficient |
5.7% (5) |
72.4% (63) |
21.8% (19) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 87 | 38.26% | Low Proficient |
9.2% (8) |
77% (67) |
13.8% (12) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
87 examinees64.87%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.3%
LoP: 12.6%
NeP: 56.3%
P: 25.3%
HP: 3.4%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
87 examinees59.91%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.1%
LoP: 23%
NeP: 57.5%
P: 14.9%
HP: 3.4%
WIKA_AND_KOM
87 examinees52.19%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.4%
LoP: 32.2%
NeP: 62.1%
P: 2.3%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
87 examinees51.28%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.1%
LoP: 44.8%
NeP: 50.6%
P: 3.4%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
87 examinees50.69%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.4%
LoP: 36.8%
NeP: 57.5%
P: 2.3%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
87 examinees41.34%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.4%
LoP: 74.7%
NeP: 21.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
87 examinees41.19%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.7%
LoP: 72.4%
NeP: 21.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
87 examinees38.26%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 9.2%
LoP: 77%
NeP: 13.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
67.05%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
64.05%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
60.85%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
58.43%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
56.96%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
52.4%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
40.93%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
42.15%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
40.93%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 90.04 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.16 |
| Understand The Problem | 78.35 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.25 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 77.78 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.58 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 70.88 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.14 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 65.71 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.19 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 59.26 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.91 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 55.56 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.4 |
| Evaluate Sources | 52.87 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.17 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 41 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.87 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 79.69 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.95 |
| Evaluate Sources | 74.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.34 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 61.69 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 19.1 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 60.34 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.77 |
| Understand The Problem | 53.45 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.57 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 47.13 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 17.73 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 41.95 | Average Mastery | 8.33 | 91.67 | 19.8 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 40.23 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.21 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 33.72 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.37 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluate Sources | 55.36 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.5 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 54.02 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.43 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 49.55 | Average Mastery | 0 | 88.89 | 21.56 |
| Understand The Problem | 43.49 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.74 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 38.31 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.76 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 37.16 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.1 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 34.67 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.32 |
| Execute Strategy | 31.42 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 14.71 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 27.4 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 19.57 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance90.04
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.16
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance78.35
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.25
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.58
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance70.88
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.14
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance65.71
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.19
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance59.26
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.91
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.4
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance52.87
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.17
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance41
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.87
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance79.69
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.95
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance74.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.34
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance61.69
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
19.1
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance60.34
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.77
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance53.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.57
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance47.13
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
17.73
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance41.95
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
8.33
Max
91.67
Std Dev
19.8
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance40.23
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.21
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance33.72
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.37
SCIENCE
9 domainsEvaluate Sources
Domain Performance55.36
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.5
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance54.02
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.43
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance49.55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
21.56
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance43.49
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.74
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance38.31
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.76
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance37.16
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.1
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance34.67
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.32
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance31.42
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14.71
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance27.4
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
19.57
21st Century Skills Performance Irisan National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Irisan National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects62.87
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects50.41
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects45.45
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 47.1% | 59.3% | 44.9% | 50.4% |
| Information Literacy | 47.5% | 52.1% | 36.7% | 45.4% |
| Problem Solving | 64.4% | 82.9% | 41.3% | 62.9% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 82.91 | Competent | 0 | 100 | 18.66 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 64.37 | Developing | 9.09 | 100 | 16.21 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 59.28 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 21.79 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 52.11 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 17.47 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 47.51 | Emerging | 11.11 | 83.33 | 12.8 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 47.06 | Emerging | 11.11 | 94.44 | 17.55 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 44.88 | Emerging | 0 | 80.95 | 15.63 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 41.33 | Emerging | 0 | 71.43 | 13.38 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 36.72 | Needs Support | 0 | 88.89 | 15.49 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving82.91
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.66
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving64.37
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
9.09
Max
100
Std Dev
16.21
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking59.28
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.79
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy52.11
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.47
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy47.51
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
11.11
Max
83.33
Std Dev
12.8
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking47.06
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
11.11
Max
94.44
Std Dev
17.55
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking44.88
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
80.95
Std Dev
15.63
SCIENCE
Problem Solving41.33
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
71.43
Std Dev
13.38
SCIENCE
Information Literacy36.72
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
15.49
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Irisan National High School | 87 | 49.97% | 1.1% (1) | 47.1% (41) | 51.7% (45) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Irisan National High School
87 examinees49.97%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
1.1% (1)
Low Proficient
47.1% (41)
Nearly Proficient
51.7% (45)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)