NAT 2024 | Sto. Tomas National High School
96
Total Examinees
44.44%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
67 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
29 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 96 | 57.77% | Nearly Proficient |
2.1% (2) |
26% (25) |
58.3% (56) |
12.5% (12) |
1% (1) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 96 | 48.05% | Low Proficient |
2.1% (2) |
51% (49) |
38.5% (37) |
8.3% (8) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 96 | 47.14% | Low Proficient |
4.2% (4) |
53.1% (51) |
42.7% (41) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 96 | 46.14% | Low Proficient |
2.1% (2) |
61.5% (59) |
36.5% (35) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 96 | 44.55% | Low Proficient |
5.2% (5) |
64.6% (62) |
29.2% (28) |
1% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 96 | 40.39% | Low Proficient |
2.1% (2) |
77.1% (74) |
20.8% (20) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 96 | 38.02% | Low Proficient |
7.3% (7) |
81.3% (78) |
11.5% (11) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 96 | 33.46% | Low Proficient |
17.7% (17) |
78.1% (75) |
4.2% (4) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
96 examinees57.77%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.1%
LoP: 26%
NeP: 58.3%
P: 12.5%
HP: 1%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
96 examinees48.05%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.1%
LoP: 51%
NeP: 38.5%
P: 8.3%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
96 examinees47.14%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4.2%
LoP: 53.1%
NeP: 42.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
96 examinees46.14%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.1%
LoP: 61.5%
NeP: 36.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
96 examinees44.55%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.2%
LoP: 64.6%
NeP: 29.2%
P: 1%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
96 examinees40.39%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.1%
LoP: 77.1%
NeP: 20.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
96 examinees38.02%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.3%
LoP: 81.3%
NeP: 11.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
96 examinees33.46%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 17.7%
LoP: 78.1%
NeP: 4.2%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
62.87%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
58.91%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
53.24%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
52.6%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
49.42%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
47.85%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
38.31%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
37.27%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
37.27%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 83.16 | Moving Towards Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 20.9 |
| Understand The Problem | 70.83 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 25.91 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 69.1 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.36 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 62.15 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.9 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 60.42 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.14 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 49.42 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.22 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 48.96 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.16 |
| Evaluate Sources | 46.35 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.32 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 37.15 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.5 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 78.47 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 22.56 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 58.85 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 19.54 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 58.85 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 19.83 |
| Evaluate Sources | 57.64 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.5 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 44.62 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.5 |
| Understand The Problem | 43.75 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.04 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 40.62 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.35 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 34.64 | Low Mastery | 8.33 | 83.33 | 15.47 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 26.91 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 16.56 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 48.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.21 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 48.5 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.53 |
| Understand The Problem | 45.14 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.96 |
| Evaluate Sources | 44.27 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.42 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 36.81 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.53 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 35.94 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.29 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 33.16 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 18.86 |
| Execute Strategy | 26.97 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 14.85 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 22.92 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.58 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance83.16
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
20.9
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance70.83
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
25.91
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance69.1
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.36
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance62.15
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.9
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance60.42
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.14
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance49.42
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.22
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance48.96
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.16
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance46.35
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.32
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance37.15
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.5
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance78.47
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
22.56
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance58.85
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
19.54
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance58.85
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
19.83
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance57.64
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.5
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance44.62
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.5
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance43.75
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.04
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance40.62
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.35
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance34.64
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
8.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
15.47
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance26.91
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.56
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance48.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.21
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance48.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.53
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance45.14
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.96
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance44.27
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.42
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance36.81
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.53
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance35.94
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.29
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance33.16
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.86
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance26.97
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
14.85
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance22.92
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.58
21st Century Skills Performance Sto. Tomas National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Sto. Tomas National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects58.42
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects43.71
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects41.7
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 39.5% | 51.7% | 40.0% | 43.7% |
| Information Literacy | 43.5% | 46.4% | 35.3% | 41.7% |
| Problem Solving | 61.5% | 75.4% | 38.4% | 58.4% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 75.42 | Developing | 20 | 100 | 19.75 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 61.46 | Developing | 27.27 | 90.91 | 14.95 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 51.69 | Emerging | 9.52 | 95.24 | 18 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 46.35 | Emerging | 8.33 | 91.67 | 17.83 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 43.46 | Emerging | 16.67 | 72.22 | 13.03 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 39.98 | Needs Support | 14.29 | 80.95 | 14.54 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 39.47 | Needs Support | 11.11 | 77.78 | 14.36 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 38.39 | Needs Support | 14.29 | 71.43 | 12.71 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 35.3 | Needs Support | 5.56 | 66.67 | 12.7 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving75.42
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
20
Max
100
Std Dev
19.75
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving61.46
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
27.27
Max
90.91
Std Dev
14.95
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking51.69
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
9.52
Max
95.24
Std Dev
18
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy46.35
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
8.33
Max
91.67
Std Dev
17.83
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy43.46
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
72.22
Std Dev
13.03
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking39.98
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
14.29
Max
80.95
Std Dev
14.54
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking39.47
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
11.11
Max
77.78
Std Dev
14.36
SCIENCE
Problem Solving38.39
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
14.29
Max
71.43
Std Dev
12.71
SCIENCE
Information Literacy35.3
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
5.56
Max
66.67
Std Dev
12.7
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sto. Tomas National High School | 96 | 44.44% | 0% (0) | 69.8% (67) | 30.2% (29) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Sto. Tomas National High School
96 examinees44.44%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
69.8% (67)
Nearly Proficient
30.2% (29)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)