NAT 2024 | Roxas National High School

79
Total Examinees
46.89%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
47 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
32 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
Subject Examinees Avg MPS Proficiency Level Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
PHILOSOPHY 79 62.97% Nearly Proficient 2.5%
(2)
13.9%
(11)
60.8%
(48)
16.5%
(13)
6.3%
(5)
SOCIAL_SCIENCE 79 55.22% Nearly Proficient 5.1%
(4)
34.2%
(27)
38%
(30)
22.8%
(18)
0%
(0)
HUMANITIES 79 49.58% Low Proficient 1.3%
(1)
48.1%
(38)
50.6%
(40)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
LITERACY 79 49.37% Low Proficient 2.5%
(2)
51.9%
(41)
41.8%
(33)
3.8%
(3)
0%
(0)
WIKA_AND_KOM 79 44.19% Low Proficient 8.9%
(7)
54.4%
(43)
36.7%
(29)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
SCIENCE 79 39.37% Low Proficient 6.3%
(5)
75.9%
(60)
16.5%
(13)
1.3%
(1)
0%
(0)
LANG_AND_COM 79 39.24% Low Proficient 3.8%
(3)
82.3%
(65)
13.9%
(11)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
MATH 79 35.14% Low Proficient 17.7%
(14)
72.2%
(57)
10.1%
(8)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
79 examinees
62.97%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.5%
LoP: 13.9%
NeP: 60.8%
P: 16.5%
HP: 6.3%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
79 examinees
55.22%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.1%
LoP: 34.2%
NeP: 38%
P: 22.8%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
79 examinees
49.58%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.3%
LoP: 48.1%
NeP: 50.6%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
79 examinees
49.37%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.5%
LoP: 51.9%
NeP: 41.8%
P: 3.8%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
79 examinees
44.19%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 8.9%
LoP: 54.4%
NeP: 36.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
79 examinees
39.37%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.3%
LoP: 75.9%
NeP: 16.5%
P: 1.3%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
79 examinees
39.24%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.8%
LoP: 82.3%
NeP: 13.9%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
79 examinees
35.14%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 17.7%
LoP: 72.2%
NeP: 10.1%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart

About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.

How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.

Standard Benchmarks
  • 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
  • 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
  • 25-49% - Low Proficient
  • <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar

About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.

How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.

Performance Zones
  • Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
  • Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
  • Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
  • Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
63.01%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#2
62.47%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#3
57.67%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#4
53.24%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#5
52.11%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#6
50.94%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#7
41.98%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#8
42.4%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
#9
41.98%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY +6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY +3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Execute Strategy 82.49 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 20.52
Understand The Problem 75.11 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 21.52
Analyzing Outcome 71.73 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 28.11
Analyzing Relevance 66.88 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 21.62
Ability To Communicate Information 63.29 Average Mastery 0 100 28.36
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 59.35 Average Mastery 11.11 100 24.36
Ability To Manage Information 54.01 Average Mastery 0 100 29.2
Evaluate Sources 54.01 Average Mastery 0 100 23
Identify Types Of Information 41.77 Average Mastery 0 100 24.86
HUMANITIES 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Execute Strategy 76.37 Moving Towards Mastery 0 100 26.07
Evaluate Sources 62.03 Average Mastery 0 100 30.35
Analyzing Outcome 60.34 Average Mastery 16.67 100 18.24
Ability To Communicate Information 59.28 Average Mastery 0 100 21.01
Understand The Problem 53.8 Average Mastery 0 100 36.26
Identify Types Of Information 50 Average Mastery 16.67 100 19.12
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 43.46 Average Mastery 0 100 33.69
Analyzing Relevance 39.66 Average Mastery 8.33 91.67 17.25
Ability To Manage Information 30.59 Low Mastery 0 83.33 17.48
SCIENCE 9 domains
Domain Avg Score Mastery Level Min Max Std Dev
Analyzing Outcome 56.96 Average Mastery 16.67 100 23.81
Analyzing Relevance 46.27 Average Mastery 0 88.89 21.32
Understand The Problem 44.09 Average Mastery 0 100 21.71
Evaluate Sources 43.67 Average Mastery 0 100 22.86
Ability To Manage Information 41.35 Average Mastery 0 100 24.28
Identify Types Of Information 35.44 Average Mastery 0 83.33 19.37
Ability To Communicate Information 33.76 Low Mastery 0 83.33 18.56
Execute Strategy 28.55 Low Mastery 0 66.67 13.07
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments 26.16 Low Mastery 0 83.33 19.79
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domains
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
82.49
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 20.52
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
75.11
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 21.52
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
71.73
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 28.11
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
66.88
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 21.62
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
63.29
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 28.36
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
59.35
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 11.11
Max 100
Std Dev 24.36
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
54.01
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 29.2
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
54.01
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 23
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
41.77
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 24.86
HUMANITIES
9 domains
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
76.37
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 26.07
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
62.03
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 30.35
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
60.34
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 100
Std Dev 18.24
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
59.28
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 21.01
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
53.8
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 36.26
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 100
Std Dev 19.12
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
43.46
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 33.69
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
39.66
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 8.33
Max 91.67
Std Dev 17.25
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
30.59
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 17.48
SCIENCE
9 domains
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance
56.96
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 16.67
Max 100
Std Dev 23.81
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance
46.27
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 88.89
Std Dev 21.32
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance
44.09
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 21.71
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance
43.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 22.86
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance
41.35
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 100
Std Dev 24.28
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance
35.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 19.37
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance
33.76
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 18.56
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance
28.55
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 66.67
Std Dev 13.07
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance
26.16
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min 0
Max 83.33
Std Dev 19.79
21st Century Skills Performance Roxas National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Roxas National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects
60.67
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects
47.93
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects
44.56
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY HUMANITIES SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness

Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.

Skills HUMANITIES PHILOSOPHY SCIENCE Average
Critical Thinking 44.0% 60.0% 39.8% 47.9%
Information Literacy 46.6% 50.2% 36.9% 44.6%
Problem Solving 63.5% 77.4% 41.1% 60.7%
Low
High
Skill Performance
Subject Skill Avg Score Competency Level Min Max Std Dev
PHILOSOPHY Problem Solving 77.38 Developing 6.67 100 18.87
HUMANITIES Problem Solving 63.52 Developing 18.18 100 15.81
PHILOSOPHY Critical Thinking 59.98 Emerging 14.29 100 19.09
PHILOSOPHY Information Literacy 50.21 Emerging 8.33 91.67 19.08
HUMANITIES Information Literacy 46.62 Emerging 22.22 72.22 12.1
HUMANITIES Critical Thinking 44.02 Emerging 16.67 88.89 16.46
SCIENCE Problem Solving 41.11 Emerging 14.29 71.43 12.75
SCIENCE Critical Thinking 39.78 Needs Support 4.76 80.95 16
SCIENCE Information Literacy 36.85 Needs Support 5.56 83.33 14.31
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving
77.38
Strong
Competency: Developing
Min 6.67
Max 100
Std Dev 18.87
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving
63.52
Moderate
Competency: Developing
Min 18.18
Max 100
Std Dev 15.81
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking
59.98
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 14.29
Max 100
Std Dev 19.09
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy
50.21
Moderate
Competency: Emerging
Min 8.33
Max 91.67
Std Dev 19.08
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
46.62
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 22.22
Max 72.22
Std Dev 12.1
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking
44.02
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 16.67
Max 88.89
Std Dev 16.46
SCIENCE
Problem Solving
41.11
Needs Support
Competency: Emerging
Min 14.29
Max 71.43
Std Dev 12.75
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
39.78
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 4.76
Max 80.95
Std Dev 16
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
36.85
Needs Support
Competency: Needs Support
Min 5.56
Max 83.33
Std Dev 14.31
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Rank School Name Examinees Avg MPS Not Proficient
(0–24%)
Low Proficient
(25–49%)
Nearly Proficient
(50–74%)
Proficient
(75–89%)
Highly Proficient
(90–100%)
1 Roxas National High School 79 46.89% 0% (0) 59.5% (47) 40.5% (32) 0% (0) 0% (0)
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Roxas National High School
79 examinees
46.89%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient 0% (0)
Low Proficient 59.5% (47)
Nearly Proficient 40.5% (32)
Proficient 0% (0)
Highly Proficient 0% (0)