NAT 2024 | Rizal National High School
150
Total Examinees
47.55%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
87 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
62 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 150 | 61.57% | Nearly Proficient |
0.7% (1) |
17.3% (26) |
65.3% (98) |
14.7% (22) |
2% (3) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 150 | 54.49% | Nearly Proficient |
4% (6) |
39.3% (59) |
42% (63) |
14.7% (22) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 150 | 49.3% | Low Proficient |
2% (3) |
44.7% (67) |
52.7% (79) |
0.7% (1) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 150 | 48.71% | Low Proficient |
1.3% (2) |
51.3% (77) |
46% (69) |
1.3% (2) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 150 | 48.32% | Low Proficient |
2.7% (4) |
56% (84) |
38.7% (58) |
2.7% (4) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 150 | 42.3% | Low Proficient |
3.3% (5) |
71.3% (107) |
24.7% (37) |
0.7% (1) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 150 | 41.26% | Low Proficient |
3.3% (5) |
72% (108) |
24.7% (37) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 150 | 34.49% | Low Proficient |
16.7% (25) |
76% (114) |
7.3% (11) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
150 examinees61.57%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0.7%
LoP: 17.3%
NeP: 65.3%
P: 14.7%
HP: 2%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
150 examinees54.49%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4%
LoP: 39.3%
NeP: 42%
P: 14.7%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
150 examinees49.3%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2%
LoP: 44.7%
NeP: 52.7%
P: 0.7%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
150 examinees48.71%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 1.3%
LoP: 51.3%
NeP: 46%
P: 1.3%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
150 examinees48.32%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.7%
LoP: 56%
NeP: 38.7%
P: 2.7%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
150 examinees42.3%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.3%
LoP: 71.3%
NeP: 24.7%
P: 0.7%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
150 examinees41.26%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.3%
LoP: 72%
NeP: 24.7%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
150 examinees34.49%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 16.7%
LoP: 76%
NeP: 7.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
63.74%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
63.33%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
58.3%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
57.78%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
53.7%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
51.17%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
42.89%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
38.19%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
38.19%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 86.78 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 18.69 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 76 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.98 |
| Understand The Problem | 75.11 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.4 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 65.56 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 19.59 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 63.56 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.58 |
| Evaluate Sources | 53.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.48 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 51.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.11 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 43.56 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.01 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 42.33 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.7 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 76 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.76 |
| Evaluate Sources | 66.44 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.86 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 58.22 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.43 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 56.44 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.06 |
| Understand The Problem | 54 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 35.36 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 48.11 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.9 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 43.56 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.49 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 38.39 | Average Mastery | 0 | 91.67 | 15.54 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 31 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 18.86 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 55.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.17 |
| Evaluate Sources | 54.78 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.44 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 49.56 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 100 | 20.83 |
| Understand The Problem | 44.22 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.93 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 41.11 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.61 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 40 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.77 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 38.22 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.13 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 31.89 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 19.99 |
| Execute Strategy | 28.44 | Low Mastery | 0 | 77.78 | 13.79 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance86.78
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
18.69
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance76
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.98
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance75.11
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.4
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance65.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
19.59
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance63.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.58
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance53.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.48
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance51.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.11
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance43.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.01
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance42.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.7
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance76
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.76
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance66.44
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.86
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance58.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.43
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance56.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.06
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance54
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
35.36
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance48.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.9
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance43.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.49
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance38.39
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
91.67
Std Dev
15.54
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance31
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.86
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance55.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.17
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance54.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.44
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance49.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
100
Std Dev
20.83
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance44.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.93
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance41.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.61
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance40
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.77
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance38.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.13
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance31.89
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.99
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance28.44
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
77.78
Std Dev
13.79
21st Century Skills Performance Rizal National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Rizal National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects61.01
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects48.72
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects44.3
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 43.9% | 56.2% | 46.0% | 48.7% |
| Information Literacy | 45.2% | 47.9% | 39.8% | 44.3% |
| Problem Solving | 62.3% | 80.0% | 40.8% | 61.0% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 79.96 | Developing | 20 | 100 | 16.89 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 62.3 | Developing | 9.09 | 100 | 17.33 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 56.22 | Emerging | 9.52 | 100 | 17 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 47.94 | Emerging | 0 | 91.67 | 17.97 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 46 | Emerging | 9.52 | 85.71 | 14.89 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 45.19 | Emerging | 11.11 | 77.78 | 14.57 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 43.93 | Emerging | 0 | 83.33 | 14.62 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 40.76 | Emerging | 14.29 | 85.71 | 13.85 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 39.78 | Needs Support | 11.11 | 72.22 | 14.36 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving79.96
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
20
Max
100
Std Dev
16.89
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving62.3
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
9.09
Max
100
Std Dev
17.33
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking56.22
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
9.52
Max
100
Std Dev
17
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy47.94
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
91.67
Std Dev
17.97
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking46
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
9.52
Max
85.71
Std Dev
14.89
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy45.19
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
11.11
Max
77.78
Std Dev
14.57
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking43.93
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
14.62
SCIENCE
Problem Solving40.76
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
14.29
Max
85.71
Std Dev
13.85
SCIENCE
Information Literacy39.78
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
11.11
Max
72.22
Std Dev
14.36
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rizal National High School | 150 | 47.55% | 0.7% (1) | 58% (87) | 41.3% (62) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Rizal National High School
150 examinees47.55%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0.7% (1)
Low Proficient
58% (87)
Nearly Proficient
41.3% (62)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)