NAT 2024 | Mil-an National High School
196
Total Examinees
49.22%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0.5%
Proficient & Above
(1 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
100 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
94 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
1 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 196 | 62.9% | Nearly Proficient |
0.5% (1) |
19.4% (38) |
53.6% (105) |
25.5% (50) |
1% (2) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 196 | 57.26% | Nearly Proficient |
4.1% (8) |
27% (53) |
49% (96) |
18.9% (37) |
1% (2) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 196 | 50.88% | Nearly Proficient |
3.6% (7) |
37.2% (73) |
59.2% (116) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 196 | 50.86% | Nearly Proficient |
3.1% (6) |
39.8% (78) |
56.1% (110) |
1% (2) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 196 | 50.3% | Nearly Proficient |
2.6% (5) |
45.4% (89) |
52% (102) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 196 | 42.32% | Low Proficient |
6.1% (12) |
67.3% (132) |
26.5% (52) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 196 | 41.08% | Low Proficient |
7.7% (15) |
70.9% (139) |
21.4% (42) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 196 | 38.19% | Low Proficient |
5.6% (11) |
82.1% (161) |
12.2% (24) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
196 examinees62.9%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0.5%
LoP: 19.4%
NeP: 53.6%
P: 25.5%
HP: 1%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
196 examinees57.26%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 4.1%
LoP: 27%
NeP: 49%
P: 18.9%
HP: 1%
WIKA_AND_KOM
196 examinees50.88%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.6%
LoP: 37.2%
NeP: 59.2%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
196 examinees50.86%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 3.1%
LoP: 39.8%
NeP: 56.1%
P: 1%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
196 examinees50.3%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.6%
LoP: 45.4%
NeP: 52%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
196 examinees42.32%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 6.1%
LoP: 67.3%
NeP: 26.5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
196 examinees41.08%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 7.7%
LoP: 70.9%
NeP: 21.4%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
196 examinees38.19%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.6%
LoP: 82.1%
NeP: 12.2%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
64.23%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
63.28%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
58.65%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
56.49%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
55.58%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
53.32%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
41.44%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
42.8%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
41.44%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 86.22 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 0 | 100 | 19.85 |
| Understand The Problem | 77.3 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.12 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 76.7 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.07 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 66.84 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.25 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 65.65 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.6 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 53.46 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.68 |
| Evaluate Sources | 52.64 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.27 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 51.36 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.8 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 43.79 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.09 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 76.7 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.07 |
| Evaluate Sources | 65.14 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.73 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 59.27 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 21.51 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 58.33 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.65 |
| Understand The Problem | 52.3 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 35.82 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 46.77 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.57 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 46.09 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.44 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 42.6 | Average Mastery | 8.33 | 83.33 | 16.98 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 33.42 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 17.7 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 56.72 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.14 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 51.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 20.3 |
| Evaluate Sources | 51.7 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.59 |
| Understand The Problem | 46.34 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 21.61 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 41.58 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.89 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 39.54 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 23.5 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 38.52 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 22.53 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 30.87 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 18 |
| Execute Strategy | 26.93 | Low Mastery | 0 | 88.89 | 14.97 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance86.22
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
19.85
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance77.3
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.12
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance76.7
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.07
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance66.84
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.25
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance65.65
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.6
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance53.46
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.68
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance52.64
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.27
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance51.36
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.8
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance43.79
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.09
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance76.7
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.07
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance65.14
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.73
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance59.27
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
21.51
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance58.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.65
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance52.3
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
35.82
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance46.77
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.57
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance46.09
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.44
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance42.6
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
8.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.98
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance33.42
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
17.7
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance56.72
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.14
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance51.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
20.3
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance51.7
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.59
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance46.34
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
21.61
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance41.58
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.89
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance39.54
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
23.5
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance38.52
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
22.53
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance30.87
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance26.93
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
88.89
Std Dev
14.97
21st Century Skills Performance Mil-an National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Mil-an National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects61.5
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects49.84
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Information Literacy
3 subjects45.76
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 47.1% | 56.7% | 45.8% | 49.8% |
| Information Literacy | 46.0% | 51.5% | 39.9% | 45.8% |
| Problem Solving | 62.8% | 80.8% | 41.0% | 61.5% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 80.75 | Competent | 0 | 100 | 17.61 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 62.76 | Developing | 9.09 | 100 | 18.17 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 56.71 | Emerging | 0 | 100 | 18.85 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 51.45 | Emerging | 0 | 91.67 | 16.84 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 47.05 | Emerging | 5.56 | 77.78 | 17.41 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 45.95 | Emerging | 5.56 | 83.33 | 14.17 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 45.75 | Emerging | 0 | 76.19 | 13.81 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 40.99 | Emerging | 0 | 76.19 | 14.47 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 39.88 | Needs Support | 0 | 83.33 | 15.93 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving80.75
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
17.61
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving62.76
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
9.09
Max
100
Std Dev
18.17
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking56.71
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
18.85
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy51.45
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
91.67
Std Dev
16.84
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking47.05
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
5.56
Max
77.78
Std Dev
17.41
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy45.95
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
5.56
Max
83.33
Std Dev
14.17
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking45.75
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
76.19
Std Dev
13.81
SCIENCE
Problem Solving40.99
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
0
Max
76.19
Std Dev
14.47
SCIENCE
Information Literacy39.88
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
15.93
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mil-an National High School | 196 | 49.22% | 0.5% (1) | 51% (100) | 48% (94) | 0.5% (1) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Mil-an National High School
196 examinees49.22%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0.5% (1)
Low Proficient
51% (100)
Nearly Proficient
48% (94)
Proficient
0.5% (1)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)