NAT 2024 | Lindawan National High School
12
Total Examinees
51.63%
Average MPS
Nearly Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
4 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
8 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 12 | 65.8% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
8.3% (1) |
66.7% (8) |
25% (3) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 12 | 61.63% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
16.7% (2) |
58.3% (7) |
25% (3) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 12 | 53.86% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
33.3% (4) |
58.3% (7) |
8.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 12 | 52.13% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
41.7% (5) |
58.3% (7) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 12 | 51.91% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
41.7% (5) |
50% (6) |
8.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 12 | 45.97% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
75% (9) |
25% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 12 | 44.44% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
66.7% (8) |
33.3% (4) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 12 | 37.29% | Low Proficient |
16.7% (2) |
75% (9) |
8.3% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
12 examinees65.8%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 8.3%
NeP: 66.7%
P: 25%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
12 examinees61.63%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 16.7%
NeP: 58.3%
P: 25%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
12 examinees53.86%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 33.3%
NeP: 58.3%
P: 8.3%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
12 examinees52.13%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 41.7%
NeP: 58.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
12 examinees51.91%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 41.7%
NeP: 50%
P: 8.3%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
12 examinees45.97%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 75%
NeP: 25%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
12 examinees44.44%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 66.7%
NeP: 33.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
12 examinees37.29%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 16.7%
LoP: 75%
NeP: 8.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
72.84%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
66.21%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
62.04%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
62.04%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
60.19%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
55.87%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
46.76%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
41.67%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
41.67%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 94.44 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 10.39 |
| Understand The Problem | 87.5 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 12.03 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 83.34 | Moving Towards Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 16.67 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 69.45 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 25.31 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 83.33 | 13.61 |
| Evaluate Sources | 52.78 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 20.22 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 52.78 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 88.89 | 18.77 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 50 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.92 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 44.45 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 25.76 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 91.67 | Closely Approximating Mastery | 66.67 | 100 | 14.43 |
| Evaluate Sources | 72.22 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 26.64 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 70.83 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 16.84 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 61.11 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 20.79 |
| Understand The Problem | 50 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 28.87 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 47.22 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 66.67 | 13.32 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 41.67 | Average Mastery | 8.33 | 75 | 20.13 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 23.57 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 30.56 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 19.04 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Relevance | 59.26 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 77.78 | 15.93 |
| Evaluate Sources | 55.56 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 15.72 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 54.17 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 23.69 |
| Understand The Problem | 48.61 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 15.9 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 48.61 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 19.79 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 45.83 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 13.82 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 44.44 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 19.64 |
| Execute Strategy | 32.4 | Low Mastery | 11.11 | 44.44 | 11.53 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 25 | Low Mastery | 0 | 50 | 17.35 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance94.44
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
10.39
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance87.5
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
12.03
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance83.34
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
16.67
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance69.45
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
25.31
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
83.33
Std Dev
13.61
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance52.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.22
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance52.78
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
88.89
Std Dev
18.77
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.92
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance44.45
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
25.76
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance91.67
Avg Score
Closely Approximating Mastery
Min
66.67
Max
100
Std Dev
14.43
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance72.22
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
26.64
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance70.83
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
16.84
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance61.11
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.79
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
28.87
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance47.22
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.32
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
8.33
Max
75
Std Dev
20.13
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
23.57
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance30.56
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
19.04
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Relevance
Domain Performance59.26
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
77.78
Std Dev
15.93
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
15.72
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance54.17
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
23.69
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance48.61
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
15.9
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance48.61
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.79
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance45.83
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.82
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance44.44
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
19.64
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance32.4
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
44.44
Std Dev
11.53
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance25
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
50
Std Dev
17.35
21st Century Skills Performance Lindawan National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Lindawan National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects66.71
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects50.18
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects49.31
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 45.4% | 56.8% | 48.4% | 50.2% |
| Information Literacy | 49.5% | 52.1% | 46.3% | 49.3% |
| Problem Solving | 67.4% | 89.4% | 43.3% | 66.7% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 89.44 | Competent | 80 | 100 | 6.92 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 67.43 | Developing | 45.45 | 81.82 | 13.1 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 56.75 | Emerging | 38.1 | 80.95 | 11.57 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 52.08 | Emerging | 16.67 | 83.33 | 21.01 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 49.54 | Emerging | 33.33 | 72.22 | 10.75 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 48.41 | Emerging | 33.33 | 61.9 | 8.87 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 46.3 | Emerging | 33.33 | 72.22 | 12.29 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 45.37 | Emerging | 27.78 | 66.67 | 13.19 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 43.25 | Emerging | 23.81 | 66.67 | 12.96 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving89.44
Strong
Competency:
Competent
Min
80
Max
100
Std Dev
6.92
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving67.43
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
45.45
Max
81.82
Std Dev
13.1
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking56.75
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
38.1
Max
80.95
Std Dev
11.57
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy52.08
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.01
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy49.54
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
72.22
Std Dev
10.75
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking48.41
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
61.9
Std Dev
8.87
SCIENCE
Information Literacy46.3
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
33.33
Max
72.22
Std Dev
12.29
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking45.37
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
27.78
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.19
SCIENCE
Problem Solving43.25
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
23.81
Max
66.67
Std Dev
12.96
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lindawan National High School | 12 | 51.63% | 0% (0) | 33.3% (4) | 66.7% (8) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Lindawan National High School
12 examinees51.63%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
33.3% (4)
Nearly Proficient
66.7% (8)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)