NAT 2024 | Happy Hollow National High School
20
Total Examinees
46.49%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
13 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
7 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 20 | 57.4% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
25% (5) |
60% (12) |
15% (3) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 20 | 52.6% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
40% (8) |
50% (10) |
10% (2) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 20 | 51.25% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
40% (8) |
60% (12) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 20 | 48.06% | Low Proficient |
10% (2) |
30% (6) |
60% (12) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 20 | 43.62% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
75% (15) |
25% (5) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 20 | 40.75% | Low Proficient |
5% (1) |
80% (16) |
15% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 20 | 40.74% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
85% (17) |
15% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 20 | 37.54% | Low Proficient |
5% (1) |
90% (18) |
5% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
20 examinees57.4%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 25%
NeP: 60%
P: 15%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
20 examinees52.6%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 40%
NeP: 50%
P: 10%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
20 examinees51.25%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 40%
NeP: 60%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
20 examinees48.06%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 10%
LoP: 30%
NeP: 60%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
20 examinees43.62%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 75%
NeP: 25%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
20 examinees40.75%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5%
LoP: 80%
NeP: 15%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
20 examinees40.74%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 85%
NeP: 15%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
20 examinees37.54%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5%
LoP: 90%
NeP: 5%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
59.63%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
57.5%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
57.22%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
56.67%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
53.61%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
46.81%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
39.17%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
36.95%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
36.95%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 83.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 50 | 100 | 17.48 |
| Understand The Problem | 77.5 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 19.91 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 70 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.45 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 23.57 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 56.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 26.04 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 56.67 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 16.16 |
| Evaluate Sources | 46.67 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 24.49 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 40.55 | Average Mastery | 22.22 | 77.78 | 18.69 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 37.5 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 22.9 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluate Sources | 73.33 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.08 |
| Execute Strategy | 66.67 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 29.82 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 55 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 83.33 | 16.75 |
| Understand The Problem | 50 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 31.62 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 49.17 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 16.22 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 46.67 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 16.33 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 35 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 26.82 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 33.75 | Low Mastery | 8.33 | 83.33 | 18.54 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 19.17 | Low Mastery | 0 | 33.33 | 13.2 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 53.33 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 23.33 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 50 | Average Mastery | 11.11 | 77.78 | 19.09 |
| Evaluate Sources | 50 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 15.81 |
| Understand The Problem | 44.17 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 83.33 | 21.91 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 39.17 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 23.73 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 35 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 21.02 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 34.17 | Low Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.39 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 16.67 | 66.67 | 12.91 |
| Execute Strategy | 28.89 | Low Mastery | 11.11 | 55.56 | 13.33 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance83.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
50
Max
100
Std Dev
17.48
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance77.5
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
19.91
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance70
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.45
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
23.57
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance56.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
26.04
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance56.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.16
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance46.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
24.49
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance40.55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
22.22
Max
77.78
Std Dev
18.69
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance37.5
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
22.9
HUMANITIES
9 domainsEvaluate Sources
Domain Performance73.33
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.08
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance66.67
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
29.82
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance55
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.75
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
31.62
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance49.17
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.22
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance46.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
16.33
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance35
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
26.82
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance33.75
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
8.33
Max
83.33
Std Dev
18.54
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance19.17
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
33.33
Std Dev
13.2
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance53.33
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
23.33
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
77.78
Std Dev
19.09
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance50
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.81
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance44.17
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.91
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance39.17
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
23.73
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance35
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
21.02
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance34.17
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.39
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
66.67
Std Dev
12.91
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance28.89
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
11.11
Max
55.56
Std Dev
13.33
21st Century Skills Performance Happy Hollow National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Happy Hollow National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects57.55
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects44.32
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects41.9
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 40.6% | 46.9% | 45.5% | 44.3% |
| Information Literacy | 40.3% | 49.6% | 35.8% | 41.9% |
| Problem Solving | 54.1% | 78.3% | 40.2% | 57.6% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 78.33 | Developing | 53.33 | 100 | 14.12 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 54.09 | Emerging | 18.18 | 81.82 | 16.64 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 49.58 | Emerging | 16.67 | 75 | 16.77 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 46.91 | Emerging | 23.81 | 80.95 | 16.79 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 45.48 | Emerging | 19.05 | 71.43 | 11.71 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 40.56 | Emerging | 5.56 | 77.78 | 16.68 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 40.28 | Emerging | 27.78 | 55.56 | 8.58 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 40.24 | Emerging | 23.81 | 66.67 | 12.28 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 35.83 | Needs Support | 16.67 | 55.56 | 11.98 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving78.33
Strong
Competency:
Developing
Min
53.33
Max
100
Std Dev
14.12
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving54.09
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
18.18
Max
81.82
Std Dev
16.64
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy49.58
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
16.67
Max
75
Std Dev
16.77
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking46.91
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
23.81
Max
80.95
Std Dev
16.79
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking45.48
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
19.05
Max
71.43
Std Dev
11.71
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking40.56
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
5.56
Max
77.78
Std Dev
16.68
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy40.28
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
27.78
Max
55.56
Std Dev
8.58
SCIENCE
Problem Solving40.24
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
23.81
Max
66.67
Std Dev
12.28
SCIENCE
Information Literacy35.83
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
16.67
Max
55.56
Std Dev
11.98
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Happy Hollow National High School | 20 | 46.49% | 0% (0) | 65% (13) | 35% (7) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Happy Hollow National High School
20 examinees46.49%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
65% (13)
Nearly Proficient
35% (7)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)