NAT 2024 | Doña Aurora National High School
36
Total Examinees
41.27%
Average MPS
Low Proficient
0%
Proficient & Above
(0 students)
0%
Highly Proficient
(0 students)
Not Proficient (0-24% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Low Proficient (25-49% MPS)
0
0%
30 students
Nearly Proficient (50-74% MPS)
0
0%
6 students
Proficient (75-89% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
Highly Proficient (90-100% MPS)
0
0%
0 students
School vs Division Subject MPS
Subject Performance
| Subject | Examinees | Avg MPS | Proficiency Level | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | 36 | 52.08% | Nearly Proficient |
0% (0) |
36.1% (13) |
58.3% (21) |
5.6% (2) |
0% (0) |
| SOCIAL_SCIENCE | 36 | 49.83% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
52.8% (19) |
38.9% (14) |
8.3% (3) |
0% (0) |
| LITERACY | 36 | 45.2% | Low Proficient |
0% (0) |
61.1% (22) |
38.9% (14) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| HUMANITIES | 36 | 42.02% | Low Proficient |
2.8% (1) |
69.4% (25) |
27.8% (10) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| WIKA_AND_KOM | 36 | 40.38% | Low Proficient |
5.6% (2) |
66.7% (24) |
27.8% (10) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| LANG_AND_COM | 36 | 35.34% | Low Proficient |
8.3% (3) |
83.3% (30) |
8.3% (3) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| SCIENCE | 36 | 34.86% | Low Proficient |
11.1% (4) |
86.1% (31) |
2.8% (1) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
| MATH | 36 | 30.46% | Low Proficient |
25% (9) |
75% (27) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
0% (0) |
Subject Performance
PHILOSOPHY
36 examinees52.08%
NeP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 36.1%
NeP: 58.3%
P: 5.6%
HP: 0%
SOCIAL_SCIENCE
36 examinees49.83%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 52.8%
NeP: 38.9%
P: 8.3%
HP: 0%
LITERACY
36 examinees45.2%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 0%
LoP: 61.1%
NeP: 38.9%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
HUMANITIES
36 examinees42.02%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 2.8%
LoP: 69.4%
NeP: 27.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
WIKA_AND_KOM
36 examinees40.38%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 5.6%
LoP: 66.7%
NeP: 27.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
LANG_AND_COM
36 examinees35.34%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 8.3%
LoP: 83.3%
NeP: 8.3%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
SCIENCE
36 examinees34.86%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 11.1%
LoP: 86.1%
NeP: 2.8%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
MATH
36 examinees30.46%
LoP
Proficiency Distribution:
NoP: 25%
LoP: 75%
NeP: 0%
P: 0%
HP: 0%
Domain Performance Bar Chart
About this chart: This horizontal bar chart shows domain performance rankings using the industry standard visualization adopted by international assessments like PISA and TIMSS. Longer bars indicate better performance, making it easy to quickly identify strengths and areas for improvement.
How to read: Domains are ranked from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) performance. Color coding indicates proficiency levels: Green (≥75%) = Proficient, Yellow (50-74%) = Nearly Proficient, Red (<50%) = Needs Improvement.
Standard Benchmarks
- 75%+ - Proficient (Target)
- 50-74% - Nearly Proficient
- 25-49% - Low Proficient
- <25% - Not Proficient
Performance Radar
About this chart: This radar chart (spider chart) is the education standard for visualizing competency patterns across multiple domains. It helps identify whether performance is balanced across all areas or concentrated in specific domains.
How to read: Each point represents a domain's performance. Points closer to the center (0%) indicate lower performance, while points closer to the outer edge (100%) indicate higher performance. A more circular shape suggests balanced performance across all domains.
Performance Zones
- Outer Ring (75-100%) - Excellence Zone
- Middle Ring (50-74%) - Development Zone
- Inner Ring (25-49%) - Intervention Zone
- Center (0-24%) - Critical Zone
Domain Performance Ranking (All 9 NAT Domains)
#1
59.36%
Execute Strategy
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#2
58.49%
Analyzing Outcome
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#3
50.31%
Understand The Problem
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#4
49.38%
Evaluate Sources
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#5
42.77%
Analyzing Relevance
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#6
42.13%
Ability To Communicate Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#7
33.95%
Identify Types Of Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#8
33.18%
Ability To Manage Information
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
#9
33.18%
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
3 of 8 subjects
SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY
+6 more
Missing: LANG_AND_COM, LITERACY
+3 more
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 79.63 | Moving Towards Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 22.61 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 72.22 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 27.78 |
| Understand The Problem | 65.74 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 25.44 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 55.56 | Average Mastery | 33.33 | 100 | 15.71 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 46.3 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 32.66 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 43.52 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 30.25 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 43.21 | Average Mastery | 0 | 77.78 | 20.08 |
| Evaluate Sources | 42.59 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 20.58 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 27.32 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 15.79 |
HUMANITIES 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute Strategy | 77.78 | Moving Towards Mastery | 0 | 100 | 24.85 |
| Evaluate Sources | 64.82 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 33.28 |
| Analyzing Outcome | 51.85 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.44 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 50.93 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 17.1 |
| Understand The Problem | 41.67 | Average Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.36 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 41.2 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 20.97 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 30.79 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 17.33 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 29.63 | Low Mastery | 0 | 100 | 34.94 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 23.61 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 17.73 |
SCIENCE 9 domains
| Domain | Avg Score | Mastery Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyzing Outcome | 51.39 | Average Mastery | 16.67 | 100 | 22.35 |
| Understand The Problem | 43.52 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.62 |
| Analyzing Relevance | 41.97 | Average Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 17.59 |
| Evaluate Sources | 40.74 | Average Mastery | 0 | 83.33 | 21.68 |
| Identify Types Of Information | 33.33 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 15.21 |
| Ability To Manage Information | 32.41 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 18.4 |
| Ability To Communicate Information | 29.17 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 18.58 |
| Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments | 24.07 | Low Mastery | 0 | 66.67 | 16.87 |
| Execute Strategy | 20.68 | Low Mastery | 0 | 44.44 | 12.33 |
Domain Performance
PHILOSOPHY
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance79.63
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
22.61
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance72.22
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
27.78
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance65.74
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
25.44
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance55.56
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
33.33
Max
100
Std Dev
15.71
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance46.3
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
32.66
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance43.52
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
30.25
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance43.21
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
77.78
Std Dev
20.08
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance42.59
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
20.58
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance27.32
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.79
HUMANITIES
9 domainsExecute Strategy
Domain Performance77.78
Avg Score
Moving Towards Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
24.85
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance64.82
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
33.28
Analyzing Outcome
Domain Performance51.85
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.44
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance50.93
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
17.1
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance41.67
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.36
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance41.2
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
20.97
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance30.79
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
17.33
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance29.63
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
100
Std Dev
34.94
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance23.61
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
17.73
SCIENCE
9 domainsAnalyzing Outcome
Domain Performance51.39
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
16.67
Max
100
Std Dev
22.35
Understand The Problem
Domain Performance43.52
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.62
Analyzing Relevance
Domain Performance41.97
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
17.59
Evaluate Sources
Domain Performance40.74
Avg Score
Average Mastery
Min
0
Max
83.33
Std Dev
21.68
Identify Types Of Information
Domain Performance33.33
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
15.21
Ability To Manage Information
Domain Performance32.41
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.4
Ability To Communicate Information
Domain Performance29.17
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
18.58
Used Evidence To Formulate Aurguments
Domain Performance24.07
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
66.67
Std Dev
16.87
Execute Strategy
Domain Performance20.68
Avg Score
Low Mastery
Min
0
Max
44.44
Std Dev
12.33
21st Century Skills Performance Doña Aurora National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
21st Century Skills Performance
Doña Aurora National High School
Average skill scores across all subjects. Higher scores indicate stronger 21st century competencies.
Problem Solving
3 subjects55.21
Moderate
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
HUMANITIES
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking
3 subjects39.78
Needs Support
Subjects:
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy
3 subjects35.44
Needs Support
Subjects:
HUMANITIES
PHILOSOPHY
SCIENCE
Skills Competency Profile Competency Assessment
Spider chart showing skill strengths and areas for development across all subjects.
Skill-Subject Development Heatmap Skill Development Effectiveness
Shows which subjects are most effective at developing each 21st century skill. Darker colors indicate higher skill development scores.
| Skills | HUMANITIES | PHILOSOPHY | SCIENCE | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical Thinking | 36.3% | 46.6% | 36.5% | 39.8% |
| Information Literacy | 38.6% | 36.1% | 31.6% | 35.4% |
| Problem Solving | 57.1% | 72.6% | 36.0% | 55.2% |
Low
High
Skill Performance
| Subject | Skill | Avg Score | Competency Level | Min | Max | Std Dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILOSOPHY | Problem Solving | 72.59 | Developing | 40 | 100 | 17.97 |
| HUMANITIES | Problem Solving | 57.07 | Emerging | 18.18 | 90.91 | 18.13 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Critical Thinking | 46.56 | Emerging | 23.81 | 76.19 | 13.61 |
| HUMANITIES | Information Literacy | 38.58 | Needs Support | 22.22 | 77.78 | 13.61 |
| SCIENCE | Critical Thinking | 36.51 | Needs Support | 19.05 | 61.9 | 11.34 |
| HUMANITIES | Critical Thinking | 36.27 | Needs Support | 11.11 | 72.22 | 15.9 |
| PHILOSOPHY | Information Literacy | 36.11 | Needs Support | 8.33 | 66.67 | 13.89 |
| SCIENCE | Problem Solving | 35.98 | Needs Support | 9.52 | 57.14 | 10.79 |
| SCIENCE | Information Literacy | 31.64 | Needs Support | 5.56 | 50 | 10.7 |
Skill Performance
PHILOSOPHY
Problem Solving72.59
Moderate
Competency:
Developing
Min
40
Max
100
Std Dev
17.97
HUMANITIES
Problem Solving57.07
Moderate
Competency:
Emerging
Min
18.18
Max
90.91
Std Dev
18.13
PHILOSOPHY
Critical Thinking46.56
Needs Support
Competency:
Emerging
Min
23.81
Max
76.19
Std Dev
13.61
HUMANITIES
Information Literacy38.58
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
22.22
Max
77.78
Std Dev
13.61
SCIENCE
Critical Thinking36.51
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
19.05
Max
61.9
Std Dev
11.34
HUMANITIES
Critical Thinking36.27
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
11.11
Max
72.22
Std Dev
15.9
PHILOSOPHY
Information Literacy36.11
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
8.33
Max
66.67
Std Dev
13.89
SCIENCE
Problem Solving35.98
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
9.52
Max
57.14
Std Dev
10.79
SCIENCE
Information Literacy31.64
Needs Support
Competency:
Needs Support
Min
5.56
Max
50
Std Dev
10.7
School Proficiency Band Distribution
| Rank | School Name | Examinees | Avg MPS | Not Proficient (0–24%) |
Low Proficient (25–49%) |
Nearly Proficient (50–74%) |
Proficient (75–89%) |
Highly Proficient (90–100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doña Aurora National High School | 36 | 41.27% | 0% (0) | 83.3% (30) | 16.7% (6) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
School Proficiency Band Distribution
Doña Aurora National High School
36 examinees41.27%
Average MPS
Proficiency Distribution:
Not Proficient
0% (0)
Low Proficient
83.3% (30)
Nearly Proficient
16.7% (6)
Proficient
0% (0)
Highly Proficient
0% (0)